One year when had a summer job I had to be at a work site around six in the morning. Just about every morning the sheriff’s patrol would pass me with his lights flashing going way over the speed limit and driving like a madman. He would tailgate and hit some kind of horn if you didn’t give the right away immediately. Several miles down the road I would see his car parked at a restaurant. I was amazed that that restaurant had that much trouble at 5:45 AM just about every morning.
Hard to believe they haven't grounded the camera-car pilot who was going 'only' 65-70 with no light bar-in a 40.
From the evidence here, it's pretty obvious that the two cops were either racing to the nearest Dunkin' Donuts, or just having some good old we-can-do-this-'cause-we're-cops fun. Sad.
@that ain't the way to have fun, son: In CT it is illegal. I have been ticketed for it. Also, I know this road, drive on it all the time. It may be a "40" but its usually so busy you cant break 30.
@Darrone: So, if some dumb-ass is going say, 25 in the left lane of a 40 MPH road, it's illegal to pass them.
Genius.
NW Oregon freeways are jammed at least in part because of the locals getting on, getting up to 45 while heading directly for the left lane, then sitting there.
Police generally aren't very well trained in driving, much less high speed pursuit. There are an awful lot of accidents, injuries and deaths that have resulted by inappropriate chases and collisions. Most of these could have been easily avoided, and most of the crimes being pursued did not merit these results. However, it is generally rare that police or police departments are held to account for their reckless behavior and the damage caused.
Patrol car shouldn't have been speeding and shouldn't have passed on the right, and should have had it's light bar going. Police car also did not slow or brake prior to the collision.
The turning car should have yielded to the oncoming traffic (unless it had a green arrow). But they should have had an expectation that oncoming traffic was traveling at approximately the speed limit - in which case they could have completed their turn without a collision.
Looks like the town's insurance premium just went up.
So sad for the families of those killed unnecessarily.
My inclination is to blame the driver who made the turn. He was trying to beat on-coming traffic as too many drivers routinely do. And so many drivers out there are poor judges of the speed of other vehicles.
Unlike others are claiming I don't see how the officer had much time to react. Basically, I think he approached this intersection not expecting that the other driver would try to make that last minute turn. The guy does decide to make the turn, but at that point there isn't much left to do but get on the brakes. There was barely a half-second there where maybe he could have swerved. Not much time to do anything, especially in a car like the Crown Vic.
There is one big caveat however. I see no indication in the video that the cop was running his lights, unless he only had the forward facing ones going, which I have no way of telling from the video. But far too often I see cops speeding around with no warning lights active whatsoever. It's just asking for trouble because in that situation they're like anyone else on the road speeding with no advance warning that they're barreling towards you.
If the cop was indeed running without lights he deserves to lose his job, in the very least, and manslaughter might not be unreasonable. But I still put more of the blame on the teenager. And reports say that the teenagers had just left a party and might have been drinking. So that would have certainly increased the chances of poor judgment, not that teenagers need the help.
Note the phrasing there, as it is very important. It does not imply that they were drinking. We have no way of knowing that at this point in time. It merely suggests one out of several potential factors in the crash.
What is known is that the cop was traveling at two-and-a-half times the speed limit, which would certainly explain his lack of reaction time. Reaction time wouldn't have been a problem if he had been driving at the posted speed limit.
No brake lights until about 0:26, and I can't see any attempt to swerve. Even at that speed, it doesn't appear out of the question that he could have made a safe lane change to the left. Bad driving in addition to the speed.
@Paul Y. don't drive too fast.: Right, because you have met and accurately judged the character of around 700,000 police officers, and that's just in the U.S.
@Paul Y. don't drive too fast.: Someone is obviously bitter. Anyways, I take offense to your comment. Are there some dishonest cops? Yes, but I sure as hell don't appreciate you lumping all of us in the same boat. I am not unemployed btw...
@Paul Y. don't drive too fast.: Even if the system works, this is a hard case for a prosecutor. Connecticut only allows a conviction for 1st degree manslaughter under circumstances evincing an extreme indifference to human life, he recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to another person, and thereby causes the death of another person. 2nd degree requires recklessness, which is conscious disregard of a known risk of serious injury or death. This may qualify, but some states have precedent saying speeding may be simple negligence (depending on the speed and circumstances). If it's only negligence, then there's an offense of Misconduct with a Motor Vehicle that's a D felony.
They'll get this guy, but it might not be for manslaughter.
A police officer traveling at 94 mph on a surface street for no known reason (as of yet) does indeed create a grave risk of death to another person, and this instance, resulted in the death of two people. You don't "accidentally" cruise around at 94 mph. That is a conscious decision on the part of an on-duty police officer that resulted in the deaths of two teenagers. They may as well throw on criminal negligence, as it sure as hell meets those standards, too.
This is as close to a slam-dunk for the DA as I've ever seen.
@pauljones: Sorry. I disagree. You just don't see a lot of convictions for vehicular manslaughter without intoxication. The gold standard hypothetical for the extreme indifference standard CT requires is firing a gun into a crowd. And now that it appears that the victims were intoxicated, this is anything but a cake walk.
1) The officer in question was still consciously driving at almost two-and-a-half times the speed limit on a surface street without cause of emergency.
2) Had the officer not been traveling at that speed, he would have had the necessary reaction time to avoid the accident.
3) Had the officer been traveling at the posted speed limit, the accident would not have happened.
4) The accident caused by his lack of reaction time as a result of consciously driving at 94 mph in a 40 mph zone led directly to the death of two people.
All of that still adds up to first-degree manslaughter.
@pauljones: You know you're the top of the commenting hit parade in my book; so don't take this as an insult: You're 100% dead wrong. This might be recklessness. Speeding down a large road like this is probably failure to exercise the degree of care of an ordinary driver in the same circumstances (negligence). It might be conscious disregard of a known risk of injury or death (recklessness). But it is certainly not extreme indifference to human life (CT's 1st degree manslaughter standard). To give you some perspective, that highest standard is defined as murder in some states. In fact, the article posted by another commenter states that they only charged him with 2nd degree manslaughter.
The defense is going to be able to argue that, far from creating a near certainty of death, the officer's speed could have been perceived by the victim (especially if he hadn't been drinking) and the accident avoided.
@snapoversteer 'bout to get told: I don't take any offense to your comment at all. I appreciate the respectful debate that we are having.
The limit for what is considered reckless driving is 20 mph over the speed limit. This officer was going almost three times that limit. That is extreme indifference to human life when you take into account that the roads are a public place that are likely to have people on them at all times of the day.
Also, the whole issue with alcohol is speculation at this point, not proven fact. Until it becomes proven fact, it is a moot point. And even if it does become proven fact, it again still does not change the facts that I listed above.
@RegalRegalia: It's a line of work that attracts really horrible personalities, plain and simple. My ex and I watched her parents' neighbor get tasered (literally for being black on a saturday night; his trumped up charges got dropped when he filed a lawsuit and mentioned that the sherriffs came back the next day trying to make the incident go away; having white witnesses in a town with a KKK chapter helps), and in that tiny town, most of those guys had reputations as douchebags long before they got their jobs.
@FTGDWolverineEdition'09: Where did you get that? I've never seen it....I have goosebumps. Thank you, thank you!!!! Do you want to go steady? I have to leave now for a few hours....I'll be back!
AWESOME!!!
The perfect tool for chasing down fornicators, transvestites, gays, and casual drug users, so as not to offend all the foreign investment by people who aren't really bothered by any of those things.
Still, my first reaction when seeing this was that if there's anywhere that needed something like this, it's the UAE. But then I'd imagine anything this is needed to catch, it'd be driven by someone who'll easily pay off the fine, followed by building a skyscraper in the shape of Christopher Walken, just because.
06:15 PM
06:32 PM
04:30 PM
From the evidence here, it's pretty obvious that the two cops were either racing to the nearest Dunkin' Donuts, or just having some good old we-can-do-this-'cause-we're-cops fun. Sad.
03:23 PM
A bad idea, yeah. I try my best to avoid it, but if there were citations for this, every state debt would be paid for by the people within three days.
Left. Lane. Squatters. Suck.
More than double-posted + no lights = guilty of stupidity and reckless endangerment.
Had this been a "civilian", they'd have been hung, roadside.
For the record, change the Miata to a motorcycle, and this is one of, if not the most common accident which affects those on two-wheels.
05:35 PM
05:59 PM
Genius.
NW Oregon freeways are jammed at least in part because of the locals getting on, getting up to 45 while heading directly for the left lane, then sitting there.
02:07 PM
Patrol car shouldn't have been speeding and shouldn't have passed on the right, and should have had it's light bar going. Police car also did not slow or brake prior to the collision.
The turning car should have yielded to the oncoming traffic (unless it had a green arrow). But they should have had an expectation that oncoming traffic was traveling at approximately the speed limit - in which case they could have completed their turn without a collision.
Looks like the town's insurance premium just went up.
So sad for the families of those killed unnecessarily.
01:37 PM
Unlike others are claiming I don't see how the officer had much time to react. Basically, I think he approached this intersection not expecting that the other driver would try to make that last minute turn. The guy does decide to make the turn, but at that point there isn't much left to do but get on the brakes. There was barely a half-second there where maybe he could have swerved. Not much time to do anything, especially in a car like the Crown Vic.
There is one big caveat however. I see no indication in the video that the cop was running his lights, unless he only had the forward facing ones going, which I have no way of telling from the video. But far too often I see cops speeding around with no warning lights active whatsoever. It's just asking for trouble because in that situation they're like anyone else on the road speeding with no advance warning that they're barreling towards you.
If the cop was indeed running without lights he deserves to lose his job, in the very least, and manslaughter might not be unreasonable. But I still put more of the blame on the teenager. And reports say that the teenagers had just left a party and might have been drinking. So that would have certainly increased the chances of poor judgment, not that teenagers need the help.
01:45 PM
1) Starting a left turn with an oncoming set of headlights a couple hundred feet away, or
2) driving 94 mph on a suburban street with traffic?
The cop is more to blame than the teens.
01:47 PM
Note the phrasing there, as it is very important. It does not imply that they were drinking. We have no way of knowing that at this point in time. It merely suggests one out of several potential factors in the crash.
What is known is that the cop was traveling at two-and-a-half times the speed limit, which would certainly explain his lack of reaction time. Reaction time wouldn't have been a problem if he had been driving at the posted speed limit.
01:14 PM
01:11 PM
/sarcasm
01:01 PM
Of course, he'll likely walk, and get promoted, because those kids were probably on their way to smoke drugs.
Show me an honest cop, and I'll show you somebody who's unemployed.
01:04 PM
Good work.
01:14 PM
01:24 PM
01:35 PM
They'll get this guy, but it might not be for manslaughter.
01:42 PM
A police officer traveling at 94 mph on a surface street for no known reason (as of yet) does indeed create a grave risk of death to another person, and this instance, resulted in the death of two people. You don't "accidentally" cruise around at 94 mph. That is a conscious decision on the part of an on-duty police officer that resulted in the deaths of two teenagers. They may as well throw on criminal negligence, as it sure as hell meets those standards, too.
This is as close to a slam-dunk for the DA as I've ever seen.
01:46 PM
Sorry Detroit... sorry.
01:47 PM
#tips
02:01 PM
1) The officer in question was still consciously driving at almost two-and-a-half times the speed limit on a surface street without cause of emergency.
2) Had the officer not been traveling at that speed, he would have had the necessary reaction time to avoid the accident.
3) Had the officer been traveling at the posted speed limit, the accident would not have happened.
4) The accident caused by his lack of reaction time as a result of consciously driving at 94 mph in a 40 mph zone led directly to the death of two people.
All of that still adds up to first-degree manslaughter.
02:15 PM
The defense is going to be able to argue that, far from creating a near certainty of death, the officer's speed could have been perceived by the victim (especially if he hadn't been drinking) and the accident avoided.
#tips
02:21 PM
The limit for what is considered reckless driving is 20 mph over the speed limit. This officer was going almost three times that limit. That is extreme indifference to human life when you take into account that the roads are a public place that are likely to have people on them at all times of the day.
Also, the whole issue with alcohol is speculation at this point, not proven fact. Until it becomes proven fact, it is a moot point. And even if it does become proven fact, it again still does not change the facts that I listed above.
#tips
02:28 PM
Thankfully, no.
...but I do live in the sort of town where people get arrested for DWI by the guy they were drinking with an hour before. #tips
02:32 PM
11/18/09
11/18/09
My cop car can go faster than your cop car!
11/18/09
@skaycog.2000: This sort of thing might be cooler.
11/18/09
AWESOME!!!
11/18/09
@skaycog.2000: Another angle. With steelies this time.
#tips
11/18/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
#tips
11/19/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
Still, my first reaction when seeing this was that if there's anywhere that needed something like this, it's the UAE. But then I'd imagine anything this is needed to catch, it'd be driven by someone who'll easily pay off the fine, followed by building a skyscraper in the shape of Christopher Walken, just because.
11/11/09
Ugh... #china
11/11/09
In Beijing, what do they call it when everyone hops out and runs around the car at a traffic light? #china
11/11/09