The nose and the cockpit shapes resemble a P-51 Mustang. That's awesome. Here's a toast of engi's brefass scotch I still have left over to you guys at Bonneville.
Oh, and if you can't do it, just stick another engine. :)
Man, I was planning on skipping Bonneville this weekend as I have too much work to do, but this tempting me to take a road trip out there this weekend. Damn you Jalopnik, damn you good sirs (and madame)
Some records are symbolic... it's cool someone went 127MPH in 1906... it's petty that someone went 131MPH in 2009. Let it be.
And besides, a 3.5 MPH increase over 102 years, with a streamlined car going against a buggy, seems unimpressive.
The last issue I see is that they should be two separate records anyway. This record should be for steam turbines, the previous record was set with a piston-steam engine. There are different records for jet powered lakesters and piston powered ones, so why is this different? These people seem to not really understand the spirit of the ordeal in my opinion.
You know, one of the most awesome things I've ever experienced was riding in the engine of a steam train. Steam propulsion is so ridiculous and so amazing all at once. Here's to hoping these guys break the record, and keep encouraging people to use steam power for future generations!
In other news, the Future Carriage set a land speed record of 45mph for horsedrawn carriages. This marvel of technology included an kinetic energy recovery system (whip powered by braking), a carbon fiber monocoque chassis, and an electronic differential for each hoof.
I guess steam cars will become worthwhile when we miniaturize nuclear reactors (?).
704hp and all he can do is 199.7? Couldn't pedal just a teeny bit more for the double ton?
Pussy.
Sorry, 704hp is good for a shitload more speed than 199mph. My own incredibly lousily streamlined truck would break 100 with the measly 103hp it wears now; 700 would push it to about the same 199.
I'm guessing better aero and wheelspin control is in order. And somebody less losertastic than James at the helm.
@Jimmie61: Both the F40 and Diablo were touching 200 mph in the early 90s with less than 500 hp each. Something's fishy about 704hp...the BMW H2R only generated 232 hp from a 6-liter V12.
10/10/09
Oh, and if you can't do it, just stick another engine. :)
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
I prefer the Goldenrod...
10/09/09
10/10/09
10/09/09
10/09/09
I'll also be patiently waiting for the feature on that 3 axle pick-um-up-truck they've got for a pusher.
08/21/09
08/21/09
Are there differnt classes for steam cars too.
08/21/09
And besides, a 3.5 MPH increase over 102 years, with a streamlined car going against a buggy, seems unimpressive.
The last issue I see is that they should be two separate records anyway. This record should be for steam turbines, the previous record was set with a piston-steam engine. There are different records for jet powered lakesters and piston powered ones, so why is this different? These people seem to not really understand the spirit of the ordeal in my opinion.
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/20/09
I guess steam cars will become worthwhile when we miniaturize nuclear reactors (?).
08/20/09
There was a robbery at the bottling plant. I think I know where the missing BS went.
08/20/09
08/20/09
Hic...no it wasn't. I'll just add snarky to the list. Yea, steam powered vehicles.
08/20/09
Good night. Chk msgs.
06/23/09
Call me when Jesse James reaches escape velocity.
06/23/09
Pussy.
Sorry, 704hp is good for a shitload more speed than 199mph. My own incredibly lousily streamlined truck would break 100 with the measly 103hp it wears now; 700 would push it to about the same 199.
I'm guessing better aero and wheelspin control is in order. And somebody less losertastic than James at the helm.
06/23/09
Is 704 HP in a hydrogen fueled V8 different than 704 HP in a gasoline fueled V8?
06/23/09