*sigh* They could at least Lotusify the current Toyota I4s... I mean, really. Is there any reason to actually buy a Lotus when you can buy an old Corolla and strip out all the interior/safety/emissions equipment and have yourself just as good of a car?
/hopefully it was obvious that I was being sarcastic...
Tell me why Lotus can design winning engines for other people and can't put them into their own cars. It just seems crazy to put Toyota's 4-cyl in your car when you have designed many 4-cylinder engines yourself.
These things are best known for their leaky gaskets. My friends Jensen Healey had a permanent oil drip pan located on the garage floor to catch the oil between the rather infrequent drives it enjoyed. Not quite add a quart before every use, but enought drips to assure that the garage floor deserved a pan.
@oddboxalfa: That's not a Lotus 900-series issue, dude. It's not even specifically a Lotus issue. It's a British issue. One of those garage-floor drip pans was one of the first things I purchased after I got my Sunbeam.
@A strolling player: Think about this: The Lotus Esprit, whether you're talking about the original '75 version or the last V8 model, uses a gearbox derived from the one in the Renault 16.
If you're anything like me, learning this caused you to think about how cool it would be to build a Renault 16 with a 355-horsepower twin-turbo V8.
Ah, the charm of British sports cars. Too bad they lost the thread in the 1970s. The Jensen-Healey was supposed to herald the revival of the genre but instead was trumped by the Datsun Z-240.
Sure, the Jensen-Healey's bumpers looked like battering rams, but the bigger problem was that the overall design suffered from British malaise. The iconic beauty of the Austin-Healey could not be summoned from the dead by a design team that may as well have consisted of postal service bureaucrats puttering in a garage on weekends. The Jensen-Healey had little soul and even less stylistic sophistication. Given the legacy of the Austin-Healey, that was an unforgivable sin. The Z may have been merely a good design, but it ate the Jensen-Healey for breakfast. Snap, crackle, pop.
Let's compare. Whereas the Z sported a lovely tapered front with shades of the Jaguar XK-E, the Jensen-Healey settled for a refrigerator-flat facia with headlight cutouts from a Hasbro toy. Or compare the Z's lovely sculpted hood budge to the Jensen-Healey's dump truck-like protrusion. The Z's back was its weakest design element, but it had much better detailing than the Jensen-Healey's chopped-off pig's butt. Most importantly - and tragically - the Jensen-Healey's profile had the hips of a nun compared to the Z, let alone the pornographic curves of the senior Austin-Healeys of yore.
How could the Japanese do a better British sports car than the British? Chalk it up to industrial disease.
That Jensen is amazingly clean and straight, much less for being on the street and a daily driver. I have a feeling that there's generally a garage involved in this equation. I'm glad this is the fellow that got the one exceptional car that proves the Lucas rule.
Thanks for the fix Murilee. It's been a rough week, what with the shakes and chills, the gradual recovery of appetite and sanity. This is so much better.
05/09/09
05/09/09
mmm...
05/10/09
05/09/09
/hopefully it was obvious that I was being sarcastic...
05/09/09
05/10/09
*rimshot*
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
You're gonna need the spare.
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/10/09
...and found out that his voice is exactly how I'd imagined the ad.
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
Example 2: "Compared to the 900 turbo-four, the Esprit's V8 was endowed with much nut."
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09
That was easy.
05/10/09
This Jalopnik thing is getting to us.
05/09/09
05/09/09
If you're anything like me, learning this caused you to think about how cool it would be to build a Renault 16 with a 355-horsepower twin-turbo V8.
05/09/09
05/09/09
03/07/09
03/07/09
I still do NOT like that there is no weekday DOTS.
03/07/09
Sure, the Jensen-Healey's bumpers looked like battering rams, but the bigger problem was that the overall design suffered from British malaise. The iconic beauty of the Austin-Healey could not be summoned from the dead by a design team that may as well have consisted of postal service bureaucrats puttering in a garage on weekends. The Jensen-Healey had little soul and even less stylistic sophistication. Given the legacy of the Austin-Healey, that was an unforgivable sin. The Z may have been merely a good design, but it ate the Jensen-Healey for breakfast. Snap, crackle, pop.
Let's compare. Whereas the Z sported a lovely tapered front with shades of the Jaguar XK-E, the Jensen-Healey settled for a refrigerator-flat facia with headlight cutouts from a Hasbro toy. Or compare the Z's lovely sculpted hood budge to the Jensen-Healey's dump truck-like protrusion. The Z's back was its weakest design element, but it had much better detailing than the Jensen-Healey's chopped-off pig's butt. Most importantly - and tragically - the Jensen-Healey's profile had the hips of a nun compared to the Z, let alone the pornographic curves of the senior Austin-Healeys of yore.
How could the Japanese do a better British sports car than the British? Chalk it up to industrial disease.
03/07/09
03/07/09
Happy the man who has enjoyed that treat for twenty years.
03/07/09
03/07/09
Thanks for the fix Murilee. It's been a rough week, what with the shakes and chills, the gradual recovery of appetite and sanity. This is so much better.
03/07/09
03/07/09
03/07/09
03/07/09
03/07/09