A friend of mine has one of these, as a convertible. That top is the biggest POS imaginable, and it's a total wrestling match to get it up. The stays would rather take your fingers off than extend properly. And even brand new and perfectly erected, that top will only deter a few raindrops.
But it's Caterpillar yellow, and gone back to live in the wilds of Maine. A fair trade all around. #internationalharvester
Murilee: I love your taste in the esoteric and otherwise-unloved machinery. I've got two Internationals in the garage, right next to the Stag: a full sized pickup and this exact Scout -- same year and everything.
You guys just WOULD choose the Scout for DOTS on the very day I'm supposed to R&R the T-90 threespeed in my '63!
I know a few things about Scouts;
*Shortest development time ever! Concieved in 1959, IH had them in the showrooms in time for the '61 model year. Without computers to help, no CAD/CAM, just pushing paper. Marketing 'focus group'? Please.
*Very high build quality. All fasteners were fine thread, and the nuts were all tack welded to the sheet metal, for the most part, they're all still there 45 years later. (I like the ones holding my bumpers on that have the IH logo embossed on the top, you just don't see that anymore!)
*Too high build quality! Scouts cost a fair penny more than their Bronco / Blazer / CJ cousins. To this day you see big three derived vehicles on CL with "Scout II (Dana 44)" axles listed as upgrades.
*IH would never make two parts when one could do double duty. Hence the 152 and 196 4-cyl. engines share a lot of parts with the 304 and 392 V-8s. And I can take the steering gear out of that RHD (yellow) Postie and put it in the LHD one behind it (and still get a lot of "crowdsourced" parts over the counter at NAPA.)
*Simplest vehicle to work on. Designed to be maintained by cornhuskers, hoosiers and oakies far out on the property with a crescent wrench.
*Today, the 2WD versions (which they eventually stopped making altogether) can be picked up cheap, have not been off-roaded to death, and can be made 4WD by a drunk monkey with a left handed screwdriver for elephant's pay.
Wow, this brings back memories. Most of them were already off New England roads back in the 80's and were relegated to "yard trucks." Most of them now are out decaying in farmers' fields.
I've never driven one, but I would guess that the small size and short wheelbase would have made it one hell of a trail truck.
Ah, those were the days when "SUV" meant "truck," not leather-upholstered rolling living room. #internationalharvester
beercheck promoted this comment
☠Grяrяrяrяrя, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. was starred
☠Grяrяrяrяrя, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. was unstarred
The Scout did die young. International-Harvester's fatal mistake was made back in the late-60s, when it decided to completely redesign both its full-sized trucks and compact Scouts. IH didn't have enough money to make both lines fully contemporary. For example, neither had curved side glass; the Scout even had a flat glass windshield.
By the mid-70s IH's looked really old hat compared to almost all the competition. Sales declined because the public increasingly wanted trucks to be more like cars.
In the early-70s IH should have instead abandoned the big truck market and concentrated on making a complete and fully modern line of compact trucks, wagons and Scouts. That would have allowed them to avoid directly competing against the Big Three and weather the two oil crises much more easily.
Alas, such a gambit would have required thinking outside the box. After all, bigger was considered better. Indeed, when it comes to trucks that's even more the case today. #internationalharvester
@DrLemming: Saying IHC should have abandoned the heavy duty market is like saying McDonalds should abandon hamburgers. Big trucks were always International Harvester's bread and butter, and smaller trucks were always sort of a sideline. The reason that the 1969-design light trucks used flat side glass was that the basic cab styling was shared with the larger truck and tractor line - the bigger trucks actually got the styling first. Curved glass was considered for the smaller trucks but since the cab-sharing was an integral part of the business plan, the curved glass was deemed inappropriate for the biggies. Besides, flat side glass never seemed to hurt Jeeps. IHC created a huge number of light truck, wagon, and van prototypes in the '60s and '70s. None of these made production because the first priority was always the large trucks.
The Scout had been substantially redesigned and enlarged in 1971, and the pickups, Travelall, and Scouts sold very well through 1973. However, pickups and Travelalls were never all that profitable, and sales declined after the fuel crisis of '73. There was also the problem that in order to buy a recreation-oriented pickup, people had to go to a heavy truck dealer instead of a "friendlier" auto dealer. Under pressure to cut costs, IHC dropped the light trucks after 1975. Pickups were made in Mexico for the local market for a few more years. Interestingly, IHC looked into badge-engineering Dodge pickups with the IHC name. Despite the loss of the pickups, IHC did very well until late '70s. The big trucks were selling like crazy. The fact that Scouts were still based on the 1971 redesign was not seen as a problem - after all, Jeeps Wagoneers, Cherokees, and pickups were lightly-facelifted 1963 designs. New Scout prototypes were under development for introduction in the early '80s. However, in 1979, IHC ran into a perfect storm of severe labor troubles, poor management, and collapsing sales after Fuel Crisis II. By 1980, the threat of bankruptcy forced massive cost-cutting and the existing and proposed Scout programs were cut. The reorganized Navistar after 1985 concentrated on big trucks and has never looked back. #internationalharvester
@tonyola: IH found itself in a similar position as independent passenger carmakers during the early 1950s – they were losing their shirts by directly competing against the Big Three. So they looked for niches that the Big Three either ignored or didn’t take very seriously. For example, AMC survived the 1950s by taking the then-radical step of dumping its "hamburgers" – the full-sized Nash and Hudson – in favor of the compact Rambler.
IH hedged its bets by continuing to offer full-size light trucks while introducing the compact Scout. That strategy worked okay during the 1960s, but by the 1970s IH no longer had the economies of scale to keep two completely different light-truck platforms competitive against a Big Three that was redesigning its offerings more frequently and making them more car-like.
As you point out, eventually IH did discontinue its full-size light trucks and added variants to the Scout platform. They didn’t sell very well. The flat windshield and ultra-stark interior design may have worked okay on the Scout, which was a hard-core off roader. But the Scout-based Travelall was terribly crude compared to even the Jeep Wagoneer, which by the late-70s was ancient even by truck standards.
Yes, IH was at a pronounced disadvantage to AMC-owned Jeep when it came to its commercial truck-oriented dealer network. That’s why IH was under much greater pressure than Jeep to offer more modern products. If in the early-70s IH had focused its limited dollars on a fully modern, Scout-based line up, it could have given Jeep a real run for its money instead of fading quietly into obscurity. #internationalharvester
A neighbor of mine, a long time ago was a big fan of the Scout. The first one he had was baby blue with a white top, the second was a greenish color. We always really enjoyed getting to ride in it.
My grandfather used to have one on the farm and it was running (albeit with a leaky gas tank, and no exhaust) when he parked it. He sold it about 10 years ago, I wish he never did. I would love to have that Scout. #internationalharvester
I'm really surprised to see so many Scouts in an unsnowy environment. They were very popular in my mountainous state, and I still see quite a few around. Neat vehicle....giddyup Scout! #internationalharvester
For a few years, a 196ci 4-pot was available. Essentially one side of the 392 V8, its bottom end is absolutely bombproof. Generating all of 111hp, it is one of the more understressed engines. I've seen where some enterprising enthusiasts have upgraded old Scouts with EFI and catalytic converters, I imagine the 196 with EFI would probably generate both more power and fuel mileage, but I don't love it for that.
But I love it for its size. 3.2 litres, in a four cylinder! Is there a counter-rotating shaft? Yeah, coming forward from the transfer case, why do you ask?
@Novaload: The Scout died young, so it will never be subjected to the excesses and softness of age. It will always be simple. It will always be a truck for people who wanted a truck, and never a minivan trapped in a squared body. In my mind, Scouts need a soft top to compete with the always convertible, sociable Bronco and K5 Blazer, but I have real admiration for their sense of purpose and intent. #internationalharvester
@skitter: All Scouts, including Travelers and Terras, have removable tops. Some are fiberglass and weigh as much as a Hyundai, but they do come off. #internationalharvester
Nice. Murilee, you need to start banging on doors and asking for keys so we can get some interior shots of these time machines. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
But it's Caterpillar yellow, and gone back to live in the wilds of Maine. A fair trade all around. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
You say "Scout II", I say "Scout II"... #internationalharvester
11/07/09
11/07/09
Well done!
11/07/09
11/07/09
You guys just WOULD choose the Scout for DOTS on the very day I'm supposed to R&R the T-90 threespeed in my '63!
I know a few things about Scouts;
*Shortest development time ever! Concieved in 1959, IH had them in the showrooms in time for the '61 model year. Without computers to help, no CAD/CAM, just pushing paper. Marketing 'focus group'? Please.
*Very high build quality. All fasteners were fine thread, and the nuts were all tack welded to the sheet metal, for the most part, they're all still there 45 years later. (I like the ones holding my bumpers on that have the IH logo embossed on the top, you just don't see that anymore!)
*Too high build quality! Scouts cost a fair penny more than their Bronco / Blazer / CJ cousins. To this day you see big three derived vehicles on CL with "Scout II (Dana 44)" axles listed as upgrades.
*IH would never make two parts when one could do double duty. Hence the 152 and 196 4-cyl. engines share a lot of parts with the 304 and 392 V-8s. And I can take the steering gear out of that RHD (yellow) Postie and put it in the LHD one behind it (and still get a lot of "crowdsourced" parts over the counter at NAPA.)
*Simplest vehicle to work on. Designed to be maintained by cornhuskers, hoosiers and oakies far out on the property with a crescent wrench.
*Today, the 2WD versions (which they eventually stopped making altogether) can be picked up cheap, have not been off-roaded to death, and can be made 4WD by a drunk monkey with a left handed screwdriver for elephant's pay.
11/07/09
I've never driven one, but I would guess that the small size and short wheelbase would have made it one hell of a trail truck.
Ah, those were the days when "SUV" meant "truck," not leather-upholstered rolling living room. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
By the mid-70s IH's looked really old hat compared to almost all the competition. Sales declined because the public increasingly wanted trucks to be more like cars.
In the early-70s IH should have instead abandoned the big truck market and concentrated on making a complete and fully modern line of compact trucks, wagons and Scouts. That would have allowed them to avoid directly competing against the Big Three and weather the two oil crises much more easily.
Alas, such a gambit would have required thinking outside the box. After all, bigger was considered better. Indeed, when it comes to trucks that's even more the case today. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
The Scout had been substantially redesigned and enlarged in 1971, and the pickups, Travelall, and Scouts sold very well through 1973. However, pickups and Travelalls were never all that profitable, and sales declined after the fuel crisis of '73. There was also the problem that in order to buy a recreation-oriented pickup, people had to go to a heavy truck dealer instead of a "friendlier" auto dealer. Under pressure to cut costs, IHC dropped the light trucks after 1975. Pickups were made in Mexico for the local market for a few more years. Interestingly, IHC looked into badge-engineering Dodge pickups with the IHC name. Despite the loss of the pickups, IHC did very well until late '70s. The big trucks were selling like crazy. The fact that Scouts were still based on the 1971 redesign was not seen as a problem - after all, Jeeps Wagoneers, Cherokees, and pickups were lightly-facelifted 1963 designs. New Scout prototypes were under development for introduction in the early '80s. However, in 1979, IHC ran into a perfect storm of severe labor troubles, poor management, and collapsing sales after Fuel Crisis II. By 1980, the threat of bankruptcy forced massive cost-cutting and the existing and proposed Scout programs were cut. The reorganized Navistar after 1985 concentrated on big trucks and has never looked back. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
IH hedged its bets by continuing to offer full-size light trucks while introducing the compact Scout. That strategy worked okay during the 1960s, but by the 1970s IH no longer had the economies of scale to keep two completely different light-truck platforms competitive against a Big Three that was redesigning its offerings more frequently and making them more car-like.
As you point out, eventually IH did discontinue its full-size light trucks and added variants to the Scout platform. They didn’t sell very well. The flat windshield and ultra-stark interior design may have worked okay on the Scout, which was a hard-core off roader. But the Scout-based Travelall was terribly crude compared to even the Jeep Wagoneer, which by the late-70s was ancient even by truck standards.
Yes, IH was at a pronounced disadvantage to AMC-owned Jeep when it came to its commercial truck-oriented dealer network. That’s why IH was under much greater pressure than Jeep to offer more modern products. If in the early-70s IH had focused its limited dollars on a fully modern, Scout-based line up, it could have given Jeep a real run for its money instead of fading quietly into obscurity. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
Pardon my simplicity, but that's what I remember about it. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
11/07/09
11/07/09
11/07/09
But I love it for its size. 3.2 litres, in a four cylinder! Is there a counter-rotating shaft? Yeah, coming forward from the transfer case, why do you ask?
Well sure the ride's rough - it's a truck.
11/07/09
Myself, I'd prefer a pre-smogged example, but they just don't make them like this any more. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
These things make old Volvos look positively streamlined and dainty by comparison.
1972 was a most excellent Scout year.
And yes, indeed, Murilee, a Scout always makes sense. #internationalharvester
11/07/09
11/07/09
11/07/09
11/07/09
11/07/09