@dal20402: It seems to me someone did a study a while back that demonstrated a serious lack of knowledge about where consumers' cars brands were based and where their cars were manufactured. Case in point: my brother used to date a girl who was forced to drive Fords, because her dad worked for Ford. What did she drive? A Hecho en Mexico Fusion, of course, because it's "American (Fuck Yeah!)".
Ahem: "young, well educated, and affluent for their age" does not indicate that these people are smart, especially regarding cars. I wonder how many in this demographic bought Daewoos ten years ago.
Although I would prefer to buy a new Lada 2110 "Classic" as my next new car, I would also be open to a nice Maruti Suzuki (Chevy Sprint) or a Tata Nano as my next new car as well. It's just a shame that it is no longer possible to buy a new Trabant 601 anywhere in the world as I would take that over anything this side of a 2CV or Renault 4.
@Maymar is breaking in the commenting system...: Sadly it seems the rest of the world is following us in our need for over complicated, bloated crap that is expensive to maintain and dies an early death. I really can't see a new Prius from today living to be 20-30 years old. It just has too many expensive things to go wrong. A Lada, Trabant, Zaporozhetz, Beetle, Fiat 500, etc. however is so simple that anyone can understand it and keep it going indefinitely. You could probably find a Trabant in a Bulgarian barn somewhere that hasn't run in 30 years and get it going for around $10. Try that with a similar "Barn Find" hybrid when they get that old. After all, it's rare to see a 1st gen hybrid on the road today. They just cost too much to fix, and help contribute to our throw away society that values fashion over utility.
After having worked with multiple Chinese engineering vendors, I believe the most dangerous job in the world is Chinese Astronaut. Number 2, would be early-adopters of Chinese autos.
It's not the technical skill that is the problem, but the impulse to say "yes, this works", "yes, this is the best solution", and "yes, I tested this" when that necessarily isn't true.
@LUV_TRUK: Agreed. It's the cultural taboos of telling your boss he's wrong, speaking up when you know something wont work, and letting your superiors know when you've got a better idea. If manufacturing isn't focused on building a superior product you end up with an inferior one.
Not incredibly surprised. This is yet another indicator of how Americans views of transportation are changing. 1 out of 7 Americans though? Better check the Jalop score before buying, fellow commenters.
It does put on display widely differing opinions: So many Chinese manufacturing practices are criticized, yet their products are welcomed with open arms.
@TimTim: I'm thinking a Chinese car might do pretty well on the Jalop scale. They're big into the smoking over there so there's a chance they could have more ashtrays than cupholders and possibly even still have working cigarette lighters.
Then there's our general love for Comunistic crapboxes and vehicles deemed inherently unsafe.
In spite of its overwhelming cheepness, I like BYD's Toyota Aygo knockoff, given how it's an incredibly simple hatchback (seriously, pop-out windows on the rear doors). And Mahindra's trucks look pretty cool. So, yeah, I'd consider Chinese or Indian cars. Hell, I'd consider something from, I dunno, Micronesia, as long as it interested me.
The study also revealed that while those who would consider a car from China and India rate reliability and durability high, they are not as interested in the dynamics of a vehicle like handling, braking and acceleration.
I suppose most jalops would not fit in the category.
On a semi-related note, on more than one occasion, I've had people surprised to find out Subaru was Japanese. Their swamping ad campaign had led them to believe Subaru was Australian.
@c0de:I didn't know this until about 5 minutes ago, but I want most of Renault's current lineup. I'd also settle for a '94 Twingo (since I could license it easily).
@Peugeot--Not Yet a Star: Those both caught my eye - the Laguna coupe is very pretty, and the Megane coupe is, well, it's a little strange, but I like that.
Wonder what will happen to that percentage when folks get a look at an actual car sitting right in front of them. Early adopters of Lexi got a great deal, Hyundais, not so much.
07/28/09
I think it would be interesting to survey those buyers, asking where their cars were made.
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
Do you think any country would be willing to trade all of our crossovers for all of their simple econocars?
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
@mr_dude:Taedong River beer. Coming soon to a divebar near you.
07/28/09
07/28/09
It's not the technical skill that is the problem, but the impulse to say "yes, this works", "yes, this is the best solution", and "yes, I tested this" when that necessarily isn't true.
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
It does put on display widely differing opinions: So many Chinese manufacturing practices are criticized, yet their products are welcomed with open arms.
07/28/09
Then there's our general love for Comunistic crapboxes and vehicles deemed inherently unsafe.
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/29/09
07/28/09
I suppose most jalops would not fit in the category.
07/28/09
One look at a crash test video of a Chinese car will make one think long and hard about 'reliability and durability'.
Also, anyone interested in vehicle dynamics will not be buying an SUV. They handle like the trucks they are.
07/28/09
This study's results are a resounding non-shocker.
07/28/09
On a semi-related note, on more than one occasion, I've had people surprised to find out Subaru was Japanese. Their swamping ad campaign had led them to believe Subaru was Australian.
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
"Young, affluent people" are that ignorant? I didn't realize the Koreans were having so much trouble with penetration after more than a decade.
07/28/09