Thanks to the commenters for posting the additional pictures and stories of cars I never knew existed. This is the reason so many people go into engineering in the first place.
Very. cool. stuff.
Seriously, a RWD smallblock powered pseudo-ute with all of today's tech thrown in.
From 1997...
To make sure the Rageous driver gets there, the communication link includes a Global Position Sensor navigation link. Entertainment is provided through the communication link by a CD pay-to-listen service that pipes in the driver's favorite forms of music.
Monitoring and control of these and other system can be maintained without ever taking your eyes off the road thanks to the Head Up Display (HUD). A track ball mouse in the steering wheel controls electrical and electronic systems such as the sound system, cell phone, heating and cooling, seats, and lights through the HUD. Additionally, driver information such as speed, odometer and engine conditions can be displayed on the HUD.
@Mad_Science: Nope. I'm Nissan. I'm going to do more or less the same thing. Slap an implied luxo brand on it, pricing it unnecessarily high, and make out like bandits.
@mlevere1992: "I'll tell you who's the hottest. Now you're gonna think I'm crazy when I tell you this; Gina. I can't get Gina outta' my head. I'm gonna be thinking of Gina all week."
@mlevere1992: The GINA and a few others from Europe (see the Saab Aero X below) are probably the most futuristic concept vehicles lately. The GINA get's bonus points for some seriously out there thinking that might mean something some day.
I wonder if the 2009 Cadillac XLR would have sold any better had it looked like this 1959 Cadillac Cyclone concept. Yes, the black nosecones were intended to be radar domes.
The wild, out there concepts were a way for engineers to flex their engineering muscles and for designers to explore the far reaches of taste and public sentiment. Now, due to overly-conservative management, engineers spend their entire careers working on a progression of vehicles which, by the third or fourth one, no longer present a challenge. Designers try to put together concept cars that won't offend and that can, with small changes to details, easily be put in production if plenty of positive feedback is received from the press and Twitter.
Gone are the days when engineers at Ford could aspire to get on the team building some crazy vehicle. SVT dies and is revived so often it's not a career path. The same thing happens at GM and, virtually, everywhere else. With the exception of fuel cell and hybrid programs, not really new is being explored. Sure, there is work to be done, and the IC engines are being made cleaner and more efficient due to research by engineers, but there's nothing really to capture the imagination of future automotive engineers.
The same thing is true on the design side of the house. Designers aren't given carte blanche to create some fanciful and wacky vehicle. Look at the FCX. It looks like a stretched Accord. Compare that to the cars above it. Why not, to show how crazy new this car is, put it in a body that is super futuristic? Are we that lame now?
I remember a few years ago I went to the Detroit Auto Show (aka NAIAS). I still remember looking at the Fairlane (which we know as the Flex now) concept thinking it was cool, but where are the really cool cars? They had a Ford GT, which gave me wood, and the Shelby GR-1. These were all very cool, but in a retro way. Nothing really showed me the future.
I think that this is indicative of the problems that plague the auto industry, particularly in the US. There is a myopic view of the future, and a risk adverse culture that stifles creativity. No wonder all the cars look the same. Nobody wants to stick their foot out and do something different. Sadly, this means that our children will be reading Jalopnik 14.0 on their hologram and looking at the same concepts above and thinking how cool they are, then getting in their Pricorbalts and flying to school.
@John Krewson: FLYING to school would be kick ass, in anything other than the Pricorbalts that are being produced today. Heck, even if it were in a Jetsons-mobile it would at least have more character than a Prius, Corolla, or Cobalt.
@engineerd: I think there is also the problem of expectations. In the 1950s, people seemed to assume that resources were infinite and the world's capacity to absorb the impacts of humanity was unlimited. Silly things like floating cities, commuter shuttles to Mars, 250-mph expressways carrying 30-foot long nuclear-powered cars, and trans-Atlantic tunnels truly appeared to be possible within our lifetimes. I remember watching the Jetsons as a small child and thinking that I could genuinely experience a life like that some day. Even as late as 1968, the future depicted in 2001: A Space Odyssey might have really happened. Then came environmental awareness, fuel crises, malaise, and a massive scaling back of our visions for the future. Rocket-ship car concepts now seemed hopeless and childish. Automakers were no longer providing money to build pie-in-the-sky dream cars. Hell, at times it seemed like we would be very lucky to have gray little battery Transpo-Pods in our future. Oh well, things don't turn out like we hoped, do they?
@engineerd: You're right and it's true in many industries. Retro as a theme is more popular than I can remember in all facets of life. I think it may be a symptom of the millenium, fear of the future. I imagine it will go away in a few years and people will again turn ahead.
@tonyola: People still assume all that, obviously more so in the better off countries, and the business and the industry sure as hell still act like that. For them only the price has changed and a few measly government regulations have come along since then.
@gssbymcfgs: "Obviously more so in the better off countries" - that's not really accurate. The US has far more stringent environmental regulations than much of the rest of the world. To give one example, leaded gas was being phased out in the US beginning in 1973 and completely banned in road vehicles in 1996. Europe did not begin reducing lead until the early 1990s. Many countries in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe, and South America still permit leaded gas sales. Poorer or recently-poor places like Eastern Europe, former USSR, China, Mexico, southern Asia, and Africa have little or no real environmental regulation, and even if laws are on the books, they are rarely enforced. You have 2.5 billion people alone in China and India, and they all want cars, appliances, and all the conveniences the first world has enjoyed for decades. Unless there are drastic (and draconian) changes in the environmental attitudes of these two nations alone, the global impact will make the effects of the US, Europe, and Japan seem trivial.
@engineerd: while mostly correct, you have to dig a little deeper to find the batshit-crazy concepts now. Try the LA Auto Show's yearly competition of the Cali design studios.
Japan is full of them, but in Europe you have to go to independent studios like Rinspeed and Pininfarina.
@tonyola: Oooh, that was ignorant. Yes, it is absolutely accurate, the west lives off the rest of the planet, fact. Western multinationals are consuming everthing in their quest for the cheapest labour and production costs and the highest profit margin. I'm not familiar with doings in Romania or Bulgaria, but Eastern-Europe not having any or not enforcing enivironmental policies is complete bull. EU is currently probably the front runner in environmental regulations, though what it is doing is still a drop in the ocean, the US just talks and talks and talks about how such regulations will ruin it's economy. Sure, the chinese and everyone wants to live like the US, but there just isn't enough of the planet to go around. Everyone just can't live as wastefully as the west has done and promoted around the planet. The human race is currently consuming 20% faster than Earth can reproduce. And that's just the renewable part. Ie. we require the equivalent of 5 Earths to keep going like that. And guess who consumes most. It's actually the west who needs drastic changes in attitude.
@gssbymcfgs: I an a Florida-registered professional engineer with 25 years of environmental experience in the field of soil and water contamination. I have personally investigated and cleaned up a very large number of petroleum and hazmat contamination sites, including some of the worst Superfund sites. I deal with state, municipal, and federal environmental regulations on a daily basis. Ignorant? I think not - I know whereof I speak.
If you want to talk only about consumption, you might have a point, although a little hysterically stated and the numbers a bit vague. However, you don't mention the 9.35 million cars produced in China in 2008, and the dozens of car manufacturing plants the Chinese manufacturers are building around the world. Ford, GM, and Toyota will not be the big suppliers of vehicles for developing areas - the Chinese are muscling hard into that game. Or the fact that China and India have little oil of their own, so the Chinese are doing everything they can to buy up future supplies. Or the massive development of industrial zones in northern China that actually caused a shortage of portland cement in the US a few years back. Yes, up to now, the US was the biggest consumer of resources, and the US (and Europe/Japan)-led multinationals have a lot to answer for. But that's all changing. Asia is now becoming the world's mega-consumer and mega-producer with its own mega-corporations. They are already looking at Africa as the next area for development.
If you want to talk about the toxicity left behind, shall we examine the untold thousands of Iron Curtain-era hazardous waste sites scattered throughout Eastern Europe, Russia, and China? Many of these sites make the worst US Superfund sites look like a playground. How about the air quality in Beijing, Cairo, Delhi, and Moscow. The blatant dumping of industrial pollutants into water supplies throughout South America, Africa, and Asia? The Three-Gorges dam project in China? The US, Western Europe, and Japan have come a long way in cleaning up the messes within their borders. Much of the rest of the world has a long way to go, and the increasing industrialization will only make things more difficult.
I like the closing thoughts on the article - it takes many of the flights of fancy and grounds them in the possible realities.
Sadly though, I don't think the bubbles sd seen in the first picture would have ever caught on; I think they'd impede my parking skills... and I'm not referring to visibility.
10/02/09
Very. cool. stuff.
08/26/09
08/25/09
One cannot leave out the Alfa Romeo BATs:
08/25/09
Call me biased, but I think the OM617-powered C111-III deserves a shout-out.
08/25/09
But what about the Pontiac Rageous?
Seriously, a RWD smallblock powered pseudo-ute with all of today's tech thrown in.
From 1997...
To make sure the Rageous driver gets there, the communication link includes a Global Position Sensor navigation link. Entertainment is provided through the communication link by a CD pay-to-listen service that pipes in the driver's favorite forms of music.
Monitoring and control of these and other system can be maintained without ever taking your eyes off the road thanks to the Head Up Display (HUD). A track ball mouse in the steering wheel controls electrical and electronic systems such as the sound system, cell phone, heating and cooling, seats, and lights through the HUD. Additionally, driver information such as speed, odometer and engine conditions can be displayed on the HUD.
08/25/09
@Mad_Science:
08/25/09
08/25/09
@gssbymcfgs: With mini-suicide doors and a 4x8 load floor!
Just look at the interior!
08/25/09
@Mad_Science: Nope. I'm Nissan. I'm going to do more or less the same thing. Slap an implied luxo brand on it, pricing it unnecessarily high, and make out like bandits.
08/26/09
Maybe that explains why it's the one crossover I don't hate...
08/25/09
How about one of my all time favs....
08/25/09
08/25/09
OK, how about this image? Couldn't get it to work before.
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
Mr Krewson if you look good arround there are still future futuristic concept cars made.
08/25/09
@BЯдΖǐL-ЯЄРΘЯΤЄЯ:
08/25/09
@BЯдΖǐL-ЯЄРΘЯΤЄЯ:
08/25/09
@BЯдΖǐL-ЯЄРΘЯΤЄЯ:
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/26/09
I re-submit this, then, as evidence that even Mercedes tuners and rebuilders believed in our mid-engined future.
08/25/09
I wonder if the 2009 Cadillac XLR would have sold any better had it looked like this 1959 Cadillac Cyclone concept. Yes, the black nosecones were intended to be radar domes.
08/25/09
08/26/09
08/25/09
Gone are the days when engineers at Ford could aspire to get on the team building some crazy vehicle. SVT dies and is revived so often it's not a career path. The same thing happens at GM and, virtually, everywhere else. With the exception of fuel cell and hybrid programs, not really new is being explored. Sure, there is work to be done, and the IC engines are being made cleaner and more efficient due to research by engineers, but there's nothing really to capture the imagination of future automotive engineers.
The same thing is true on the design side of the house. Designers aren't given carte blanche to create some fanciful and wacky vehicle. Look at the FCX. It looks like a stretched Accord. Compare that to the cars above it. Why not, to show how crazy new this car is, put it in a body that is super futuristic? Are we that lame now?
I remember a few years ago I went to the Detroit Auto Show (aka NAIAS). I still remember looking at the Fairlane (which we know as the Flex now) concept thinking it was cool, but where are the really cool cars? They had a Ford GT, which gave me wood, and the Shelby GR-1. These were all very cool, but in a retro way. Nothing really showed me the future.
I think that this is indicative of the problems that plague the auto industry, particularly in the US. There is a myopic view of the future, and a risk adverse culture that stifles creativity. No wonder all the cars look the same. Nobody wants to stick their foot out and do something different. Sadly, this means that our children will be reading Jalopnik 14.0 on their hologram and looking at the same concepts above and thinking how cool they are, then getting in their Pricorbalts and flying to school.
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
08/25/09
Japan is full of them, but in Europe you have to go to independent studios like Rinspeed and Pininfarina.
08/25/09
08/25/09
If you want to talk only about consumption, you might have a point, although a little hysterically stated and the numbers a bit vague. However, you don't mention the 9.35 million cars produced in China in 2008, and the dozens of car manufacturing plants the Chinese manufacturers are building around the world. Ford, GM, and Toyota will not be the big suppliers of vehicles for developing areas - the Chinese are muscling hard into that game. Or the fact that China and India have little oil of their own, so the Chinese are doing everything they can to buy up future supplies. Or the massive development of industrial zones in northern China that actually caused a shortage of portland cement in the US a few years back. Yes, up to now, the US was the biggest consumer of resources, and the US (and Europe/Japan)-led multinationals have a lot to answer for. But that's all changing. Asia is now becoming the world's mega-consumer and mega-producer with its own mega-corporations. They are already looking at Africa as the next area for development.
If you want to talk about the toxicity left behind, shall we examine the untold thousands of Iron Curtain-era hazardous waste sites scattered throughout Eastern Europe, Russia, and China? Many of these sites make the worst US Superfund sites look like a playground. How about the air quality in Beijing, Cairo, Delhi, and Moscow. The blatant dumping of industrial pollutants into water supplies throughout South America, Africa, and Asia? The Three-Gorges dam project in China? The US, Western Europe, and Japan have come a long way in cleaning up the messes within their borders. Much of the rest of the world has a long way to go, and the increasing industrialization will only make things more difficult.
08/25/09
Sadly though, I don't think the bubbles sd seen in the first picture would have ever caught on; I think they'd impede my parking skills... and I'm not referring to visibility.
08/25/09
08/25/09
Uhm, how can you guys forget the FINEST concept car anyone ever built in the late 60's / early 70's?
This one is definitely an example.
08/25/09