Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #hyundaigenesiscoupe20 more →
Chevy Camaro SS, LS Vs. The Competition: By The Numbers
| posts about #hyundaigenesiscoupe20 more → |
Chevy Camaro SS, LS Vs. The Competition: By The Numbers |
03/18/09
At least, until the new Taurus SHO arrives.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
The Camaro looks like a 6'8" nose tackle who just saw a bad snap.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
It's quite obvious that Hyundai has taken great strides in quality, reliability, and desirability. Almost all of the modern car companies are looking over their shoulder, including Benz, BMW, and Audi. Not bad for a company that started importing cars into the US in 1986.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
[www.chevrolet.com]
03/18/09
03/18/09
One way or another.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
I was thinking the more important "dollar per" figure, would be 0-60 time per MSRP. That measures performance.
I quickly did a comparison that way, figuring MSRP divided by the amount of time under 10 seconds to reach 60 mph, and got the following (the further under 10 seconds, the better the performance):
#1: Camaro $5740
#2: Hyundai $5813
#3: Mustang GT $5832
#4: 370Z $6108
#5: Challenger RT $6233
#6: Challenger SRT8 $7650
#7: Shelby GT500 $7852
Feel free to point out the errors in my math, but I think that's a better way to measure performance then $/hp.
03/18/09
However, the point I was getting at, was that for a buyer who is not that concerned with purchase price, a higher output vehicle that gets a relatively better MPG figure might be more fun to have as a toy. Since, as gas prices go up, there would be less concern with fuel availability/cost, one could use it more freely.
So if you want a ride with high HP and reasonable MPG, the Shelby GT 500 is a better buy.
03/18/09
Oh, here we go-Photography credit: Wetzel Tucker
I'm not going in the darkroom with anybody that Tucks their Wetzel.
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09
03/18/09