@that ain't the way to have fun, son: Atari really had it going on in the late '80s. I think they used the same technology for 720° and STUN Runner. Now, if Honda would build a STUN Runner simulator, I'd pay a dollar for that ride.
Now if anyone, even just one, person at Chrysler had half a brain, they'd really grab this opportunity. Safety is important, and a fantastic selling point.
This may be the one and only thing Dodge can shove into Toyota's face and actually have ground to stand on.
Just a big FYI
The IIHS does not test Porsches. It does not test many of the most expensive BMWs and Mercedes either. Therefore their absence should not make a big difference.
The IIHS told us they tested only 52 roofs at this point. Why? Because when they told manufacturers of the tests and asked them to send cars they thought had a chance of passing, all they got was 52. of those 27 passed. They will add new models to the list throughout the year though as they do more testing. That's why so many 2010 models were rushed through the old testing to get 2009 awards.
Single most important safety feature: an alert driver. Everything else is bandaids to minimize the consequences of the driver's failure, both of this vehicle and of those around him.
@that ain't the way to have fun, son:
no kidding. I recently parked my '85 CRX Si next to a newish Civic Si, and the difference in bulk is striking.
2 feet longer and almost 1000lb heavier to accomplish the same task of carrying 4 people (in the Gen 1 hatch version) and providing a smart, fun drive ? Honda, really?
I guess the Fit is left to carry Soichorio's torch
The sheetmetal looks showroom fresh. I was surfing for one of these for a daily driver a few months back. But then I decided to get a Karmann Ghia instead. ;-) #1978
11/24/09
11/23/09
also, are they going to allow open source programs to run on it? i could seriously go for some zombie-apocalypse biking games......
11/23/09
11/23/09
Never got particularly good at it, but still, it was fun.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
ah memories
11/23/09
@MyDinnerWithAndreDawson: Memories indeed...
11/18/09
This may be the one and only thing Dodge can shove into Toyota's face and actually have ground to stand on.
11/18/09
It can't be uglier than this.
11/18/09
@Pessimippopotamus: Or this.
11/18/09
@Pessimippopotamus: Or this to the LA Show for premier?
11/18/09
(bass solo)
11/18/09
/P-NUT kicks ass in concert. #311
11/18/09
11/18/09
The IIHS does not test Porsches. It does not test many of the most expensive BMWs and Mercedes either. Therefore their absence should not make a big difference.
The IIHS told us they tested only 52 roofs at this point. Why? Because when they told manufacturers of the tests and asked them to send cars they thought had a chance of passing, all they got was 52. of those 27 passed. They will add new models to the list throughout the year though as they do more testing. That's why so many 2010 models were rushed through the old testing to get 2009 awards.
11/18/09
11/18/09
I guess it would be best to drive in overstuffed furniture. That would, you know, cushion any impacts.
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/14/09
This is a proper small car. The current Civic is larger than the first, and probably second, generation Accords. #1978
11/15/09
@that ain't the way to have fun, son:
no kidding. I recently parked my '85 CRX Si next to a newish Civic Si, and the difference in bulk is striking.
2 feet longer and almost 1000lb heavier to accomplish the same task of carrying 4 people (in the Gen 1 hatch version) and providing a smart, fun drive ? Honda, really?
I guess the Fit is left to carry Soichorio's torch
[en.wikipedia.org] #1978
11/14/09