It looks a bit nicer than the 2010 Prius, but it's still stupid. The problem with Hybrids is that they are not that green, and not that good at anything else either. If people were really concerned with fuel economy and saving the planet (if you believe that Anthropogenic Climate Change BS), they would sacrifice size, build quality and safety features for a simple, reliable diesel car with a manual transmission, like the old VW Lupo that got 78+ MPG (I forget the exact model designation). But, no. Hybrids are about fashion, not genuine concern for things environmental, otherwise, who would buy a car filled with several hundred pounds of toxic, heavy metal batteries that can't be recycled, and that require a far larger amount of pollution to produce than any normal car?
@Jim-Bob: Get informed. The amount of heavy metals used in hybrids is much less than you think, and almost 100% is reusable for new batteries.
Building a hybrid is slightly more polluting than building a similar non hybrid car, but because of the lower emissions, this difference is easily overcome in the first year of usage.
Your analogy with an older and much smaller car does not work either, that is not realistic.
@sos10: It still will not last as long as a conventional car, especially a good diesel. They will get disposed of early in their life cycle with low miles, perhaps as few as 150,000 due to repair costs. I expect a new car to go 300-400k miles without a repair that costs more than maybe $700 (like my 310,000 mile daily driver that still sees 35k a year). The batteries cost several thousand dollars to replace, and the CVT transmission is VERY expensive to replace.
You also have to remember that diesel is artificially expensive in this country due to excessive taxation. If it were cheaper than regular gas (as it used to be), it would be more popular. Heck, if it were the same price, I would probably go out and buy an old diesel Mercedes Benz 300TD! At least I know they last.
@Jim-Bob: The first generation of Prii is still running fine, there are no figures (or proof) that a hybrid lasts less. Prii have proven to need very little maintenance, very few batty packs have been exchanged, very very few.
A CVT transmission does not cost more than any other transmission, but it has less parts that will wear out, therefore theoretically will last longer.
You are also confused with old style diesels, that where strong and reliable because of the simplicity of the technology (or lack of). Modern diesels, that comply with regulations etc. are high tech machines that are just as prone to defects as a regular gas engine.
I love the MB 300TD's, in my opinion, the last real Mercedes MB made.
Run them on recycled oil and it is a perfect automobile...
@sos10: Well, the problem with the CVT us that in most cases it is MUCH more expensive to rebuild than a regular manual transmission. This is why I hate the original insight the least of all hybrids. It was available with a manual transmission, which is the only way a car should ever be built. (A man who can't drive a manual transmission just isn't a man.) Hybrids typically can't take too much beating either. I expect to do full throttle redline shifts all day long in a car, as my truck sees 20-40 of them every day, at the fuel cut of 6800rpm, has one owner, and 310,000 miles-with one engine that uses almost no oil (Go Nissan KA24DE!!!). I plan on seeing 500k out of it before it requires an engine rebuild so long as I can keep the rods inside the engine. You can't tell me that all the technology in a Prius will allow reliable, unlimited pizza delivery hoonage like a Nissan D22 Frontier will. All the complexity of the hybrid drivetrain means you have too many possible failure points. Plus, I bet it won't jump as well as the B14 Sentra I used to use either. It took all the abuse I could hurl at it with no complaint. It was the village whore-everyone got a ride, and a chance to pull the handbrake! Give me a Prius for a week to use like I would a normal car, and I guarantee I will break it. BTW, I am not just a pizza delivery drier, but a Mechanical Engineering student as well. I actually DO understand all of the underlying technologies here.
@Jim-Bob: Hi, I'm a mechanical engineering student and I delivered pizza in my Toyota Prius for the better part of a year. Flogged the shit out of it. Still running beautifully.
It's a lot less fucking ugly than a Prius, and it's cheaper. Anything that can potentially reduce the number of new Prii people buy is good in my book. Ergo, I approve.
Wes: I don't understand the negativity about hybrids in general, but particularly not when it comes to this car. With the Insight, the price of a hybrid has come down by 20% while delivering much better gas mileage than similar vehicles. Compare Honda's own (widely lauded) Fit at 28/31/35 numbers to the Insight's 40/43/41 - that's about 33% better mileage across the board. How is that "miguided" or "hypocritical?"
I get it, you like muscle cars. But give a little credit to cars that people can afford and that offer significant improvements in economy. After all, there are going to be a lot more of them on the road than Maclarans or GT500's.
@weatherman: I actually prefer, basic, well engineered, cleverly packaged, affordable cars, but I understand your question.
The Insight is most of the above, but it's not the most economical vehicle Honda could have offered at an entry-level price point. The Civic Diesel is that car.
Additionally, purchasing a new car is hardly the best way to reduce your personal impact on the environment. Hanging on to an older, less efficient car for longer is actually better than purchasing a more efficient new one. Riding a bicycle is even better, that's my main mode of short distance transportation.
My point here is that you're not going to save polar bears by buying any new vehicle, but if you want a hybrid, the Insight is going to be pretty cheap and pretty good.
@weatherman: I agree. As fun as it is to stereotype and outsource your talking points to a television show, they just don't hold up. I haven't met a Hybrid owner yet who is totally clueless and just drives a Hybrid cuz it's cool for their 200 mile daily commute. Conversely, driving a hybrid tends to be just one component of an overall approach to minimize consumption. So if my hybrid-driving colleagues are just glommers trying to look cool, they are totally off-course with the whole nine different levels of recycling going on in their kitchens and the compost worm farms out back.
Then again, I live in San Francisco, so I'm used to hearing about how wrong we are about everything.
And for the record, I currently can't decide if I want to buy a car that's semi-economical (68 Cougar) or just plain party time (blown s197 Mustang).
@Wes Siler: Thanks for taking the time to explain your position a little more. I understand your position and mostly agree. I just thought the commentary came out a little harsh and inflammatory.
The fact is that we're not going to all ride bicycles, and people are not going to stop buying cars. If they're going to buy them, buying hybrids and EVs ultimately will have an impact, especially as prices come down and technology improves.
As for that whole argument about the diesels, I think that's a bit of a red herring. There are a lot of issues with diesels, mostly regulatory from what I gather, so while Honda could have introduced a diesel theoretically, I think it's a little unfair to hold that against the Insight. Second, the vehicle you compare with the 70+ mpg is a compact with significantly less interior room. That might be fine for individual driving, but as a family vehicle I don't think it'd be practical.
Let's look at the Insight for what it is; an affordable, very practical car that offers good economy even if it isn't the most fun or well refined car.
@eggwich del fiero: when I even hear the word "Cougar" I throw up a little in my mouth. I just associate it with big, heavy, ugly cars. The '68 isn't bad in a retro sort of way, but I'd go for the Mustang.
@weatherman: Completely agree with you point of view.
I would like to ad that investing in a hybrid car is investing in new technology.. and in order to make that technology better and more affordable, buying into it is the quickest way.
I love big gas guzzling engines and exotic cars.. but I am also conscience about the rest.. call it Realautopolitik if you want.
"Who wants a dirty diesel? Besides, have you seen how much diesel costs these days! EWWWW"
I'm not sure if it's the dealers or the enviromentals who are more to blame.
Nonetheless, the sheer appropriateness of how the South Park episode represents the Prius and Insight phenomenon is hilarious. It's also the biggest threat to the success of the Fusion Hybrid. If I had the bucks, I'd buy the Fusion just to go park in the Toyota dealer's lot.
@Jeb_Hoge: Dirty? You just came out of a cave or something? Any last gen diesel car from european and even japanese manufacturers is cleaner than your average petrol homemade V6 or I4.
@ck314: No, it is not. The amount of particles diesels produce are still very high. and it is those fine particles that cause so many respiratory diseases.
To filter out these particles you need highly sophisticated systems, that as a side effect lower the fuel efficiency of the car, besides making it slower and more expensive.
@Manic King of Corinthia: No, you are wrong. They are doing a lot to make diesels cleaner, but because diesels became so widespread before they started to realise that those particles are a big danger, it isn't easy or fast to correct the mess.
Many cities and or areas, like the whole northern part of Italy, have since many years, very restricting driving policies; especially during the colder season, when smog tends to hang lower, they have even/uneven car plates days, meaning you are allowed only to drive on an uneven number day if you have a plate that ends on an uneven number. Almost once a month they have a complete traffic block, meaning nobody is allowed to drive, except those with special permits (and EV hybrids).
...If you want a really tiny diesel engine and 0-60 times that are greater than 8 seconds.
The US gets screwed, and can't have such cars. I really think that, economic climate aside, there's a market for a good, really efficient, small car in the US. It's just that no one knows this for sure, since we don't ever get to see those cars.
01/11/09
Good work Honda, keep it up.
01/11/09
01/11/09
Building a hybrid is slightly more polluting than building a similar non hybrid car, but because of the lower emissions, this difference is easily overcome in the first year of usage.
Your analogy with an older and much smaller car does not work either, that is not realistic.
01/11/09
You also have to remember that diesel is artificially expensive in this country due to excessive taxation. If it were cheaper than regular gas (as it used to be), it would be more popular. Heck, if it were the same price, I would probably go out and buy an old diesel Mercedes Benz 300TD! At least I know they last.
01/11/09
A CVT transmission does not cost more than any other transmission, but it has less parts that will wear out, therefore theoretically will last longer.
You are also confused with old style diesels, that where strong and reliable because of the simplicity of the technology (or lack of). Modern diesels, that comply with regulations etc. are high tech machines that are just as prone to defects as a regular gas engine.
I love the MB 300TD's, in my opinion, the last real Mercedes MB made.
Run them on recycled oil and it is a perfect automobile...
01/12/09
02/08/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
Toyota makes hybrid diesel trucks (japan only)
The problem is the cost of such a vehicle.
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
I get it, you like muscle cars. But give a little credit to cars that people can afford and that offer significant improvements in economy. After all, there are going to be a lot more of them on the road than Maclarans or GT500's.
01/11/09
The Insight is most of the above, but it's not the most economical vehicle Honda could have offered at an entry-level price point. The Civic Diesel is that car.
Additionally, purchasing a new car is hardly the best way to reduce your personal impact on the environment. Hanging on to an older, less efficient car for longer is actually better than purchasing a more efficient new one. Riding a bicycle is even better, that's my main mode of short distance transportation.
My point here is that you're not going to save polar bears by buying any new vehicle, but if you want a hybrid, the Insight is going to be pretty cheap and pretty good.
01/11/09
Then again, I live in San Francisco, so I'm used to hearing about how wrong we are about everything.
And for the record, I currently can't decide if I want to buy a car that's semi-economical (68 Cougar) or just plain party time (blown s197 Mustang).
America, F#ck yeah!
01/11/09
The fact is that we're not going to all ride bicycles, and people are not going to stop buying cars. If they're going to buy them, buying hybrids and EVs ultimately will have an impact, especially as prices come down and technology improves.
As for that whole argument about the diesels, I think that's a bit of a red herring. There are a lot of issues with diesels, mostly regulatory from what I gather, so while Honda could have introduced a diesel theoretically, I think it's a little unfair to hold that against the Insight. Second, the vehicle you compare with the 70+ mpg is a compact with significantly less interior room. That might be fine for individual driving, but as a family vehicle I don't think it'd be practical.
Let's look at the Insight for what it is; an affordable, very practical car that offers good economy even if it isn't the most fun or well refined car.
01/11/09
01/11/09
I would like to ad that investing in a hybrid car is investing in new technology.. and in order to make that technology better and more affordable, buying into it is the quickest way.
I love big gas guzzling engines and exotic cars.. but I am also conscience about the rest.. call it Realautopolitik if you want.
01/11/09
01/11/09
01/11/09
Jeez, that's a bland statement. But I mean it sincerely.
01/11/09
I'm not sure if it's the dealers or the enviromentals who are more to blame.
Nonetheless, the sheer appropriateness of how the South Park episode represents the Prius and Insight phenomenon is hilarious. It's also the biggest threat to the success of the Fusion Hybrid. If I had the bucks, I'd buy the Fusion just to go park in the Toyota dealer's lot.
01/11/09
01/11/09
To filter out these particles you need highly sophisticated systems, that as a side effect lower the fuel efficiency of the car, besides making it slower and more expensive.
01/11/09
01/11/09
Many cities and or areas, like the whole northern part of Italy, have since many years, very restricting driving policies; especially during the colder season, when smog tends to hang lower, they have even/uneven car plates days, meaning you are allowed only to drive on an uneven number day if you have a plate that ends on an uneven number. Almost once a month they have a complete traffic block, meaning nobody is allowed to drive, except those with special permits (and EV hybrids).
01/11/09
01/11/09
...In Europe.
...If you want a really tiny diesel engine and 0-60 times that are greater than 8 seconds.
The US gets screwed, and can't have such cars. I really think that, economic climate aside, there's a market for a good, really efficient, small car in the US. It's just that no one knows this for sure, since we don't ever get to see those cars.