I'm wondering what the aerodynamics of this would have been like at speed? How much frond end lift do you think that body would generate at say, 100 mph?
Chrysler and Ghia had a fruitful relationship in the '50's and '60's collaberating on some very special cars, both as one-offs and small series. The Ghia 450SS, using the same powertrain as the contemporary Barracuda Formula S, was the last of these coachbuilt specials.
" When the Corporation was in such dire straights, back in 1979, Chrysler got some loan guarantees from the US Government. That Chrysler (as a condition of those loans) had to sell off Chrysler Defense and the M1 turbine-powered tank program is lesser known, but still public knowledge.
What is known only to a priveleged few is that the government killed a dream of a lifetime for a group of 70 people at the Chrysler "skunkworks" in Highland Park.
Believe it or not, Chrysler was days away from making a production decision (one which Iacocca favored) on a rather unique vehicle...
The 1981 Chrysler New Yorker Turbine car (M-body) was ready to be tooled, according to the head of the program, Mr. George Scheckter, whom I met when I got to see and touch the 1963 Turbine Car again in 1989. There was no more design work to be accomplished, just tool and start production.
The Turbine Engine was a fifth generation (not a 3rd generation like the 1963 car) engine capable of 22mpg in the EPA test cycles. One of the prototypes is still in existence (at least it was in 1989), stored in the same building as the 1963 car, its tooling and all the remaining spare parts (enough to build 3 more of the 1963 cars).
Your government thought it was too much of a risk and ordered the car cancelled as "too risky, from an economic standpoint." Just imagine what COULD have happened!"
Chrysler actually built rockets (Redstone Ballistic Missiles) for the NASA and USAF till the end of 60s or so. That's how they acquired a lot of the gas turbine technology. Hell! The pentastar guys even enabled the US to mass produce nuclear bombs.
After re-reading I have to ask, in the 1950's when Chrysler fitted it with a 130HP gas turbine, just how much power does its current gas turbine produce?
Maybe now that Chrysler is no longer US owned, it can once again start building the turbine engined cars of our future. After all, a Gas Turbine engine would be great for a series electric hybrid. It can run on damn near anything, and is best at a steady state speed. Thus, the batteries and wheel motors become the transmission and the turbine spins at the speed it is most efficient at, and turns a generator through some sort of gear box at it's maximum efficiency too. Augment it with CIGSS sprayable solar technology in lieu of paint and you could theoretically have the perfect commuter car, with a range that would in point of fact be better than a Volt when considering a round trip commute and an 8-10 hour stay parked in the sun.
05/01/09
Jet Cars gone
Jet Car stole my baby...
05/02/09
05/01/09
05/01/09
05/01/09
05/01/09
05/01/09
50 years on, they give us this:
Seriously, what the f**k?
05/01/09
[www.starshipmodeler.com]
05/01/09
Makes you think- this is what Batman would roll in, if he happened to be fighting crime in Roma rather than Gotham.
05/01/09
" When the Corporation was in such dire straights, back in 1979, Chrysler got some loan guarantees from the US Government. That Chrysler (as a condition of those loans) had to sell off Chrysler Defense and the M1 turbine-powered tank program is lesser known, but still public knowledge.
What is known only to a priveleged few is that the government killed a dream of a lifetime for a group of 70 people at the Chrysler "skunkworks" in Highland Park.
Believe it or not, Chrysler was days away from making a production decision (one which Iacocca favored) on a rather unique vehicle...
The 1981 Chrysler New Yorker Turbine car (M-body) was ready to be tooled, according to the head of the program, Mr. George Scheckter, whom I met when I got to see and touch the 1963 Turbine Car again in 1989. There was no more design work to be accomplished, just tool and start production.
The Turbine Engine was a fifth generation (not a 3rd generation like the 1963 car) engine capable of 22mpg in the EPA test cycles. One of the prototypes is still in existence (at least it was in 1989), stored in the same building as the 1963 car, its tooling and all the remaining spare parts (enough to build 3 more of the 1963 cars).
Your government thought it was too much of a risk and ordered the car cancelled as "too risky, from an economic standpoint." Just imagine what COULD have happened!"
05/01/09
05/01/09
05/01/09
05/03/09
05/01/09
05/01/09
Yeah, that's efficient.
God, that is an awesome car, though.
Definitely worthy of "Coolest Chrysler EVAR".
05/01/09
I still think that.
05/01/09
05/01/09
There's your answer. It's the same reason we don't have mass-produced flying cars.
05/01/09
05/01/09
05/01/09
05/01/09
05/01/09