I have typically beaten highway ratings pretty easily, but city ratings always seem optimistic to me, even with A/C off and very conservative driving.
I still think both rating should be more objective. Like steady 20mph in 2nd gear (as a proxy for city) and steady 70mph in top gear (proxy for highway).
So, what will happen to these numbers in the next 5-10 years? Will it improve further, or will it stall due to the end of C4C?
As an European these numbers really surprise me, as 23 mpg is almost considered a gas guzzler value here. Even for a gasoline powered mid sized car.
@Triborough: Why would these numbers be necessarily inflated? People were incentivezed to buy slightly more efficient cars than usual -- I fail to see why this would be in any way surprising.
FP: Your Volvo is awesome! Anyway promoted this comment
☠Grяrяrяrяrя, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. was starred
☠Grяrяrяrяrя, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. was unstarred
"The administration estimated the requirements would cost up to $1,300 per new vehicle by 2016 - but that it would take just three years to pay off that investment"
Huh? W'ah? Um, I think if people don't feel that $1,300 on top of the price of the car is worth it, they just won't buy new cars and the auto companies won't be paying off that investment.
@LoganSix: Exactly why CAFE is a failure. It tries to force the carmakers to build cars that Congress -- not consumers in general -- want. If our government was really serious about this they would raise the gas tax*. However, this is considered political suicide, particularly at this time. Instead, they make the cowardly and politically expedient move of putting the onus on the car companies to ensure their sales meet some arbitrary average fuel economy regardless of what people will actually buy.
*I don't support this, however if reducing fuel usage in this country is the goal, this is the way to do it.
Dear Powers that Be, how about a hand out for the rest of us, you know the people with good credit, bought a home we can afford, pay our bills on time, and buy cars that don't suck and get good milage. WTF, where is our hand out.
@flipnut: Word UP. A few grand post-tax would be nice. That way I could replace my mailbox, service my car, get some branches trimmed, and add some pennies to my piggy bank. Call it a "good citizen award."
09/29/09
I like intake roar.
09/29/09
09/29/09
Any vehicle can be driven more efficiently than what the sticker claims, by simply giving a shit about how much fuel you use.
09/29/09
I have typically beaten highway ratings pretty easily, but city ratings always seem optimistic to me, even with A/C off and very conservative driving.
I still think both rating should be more objective. Like steady 20mph in 2nd gear (as a proxy for city) and steady 70mph in top gear (proxy for highway).
09/29/09
As an European these numbers really surprise me, as 23 mpg is almost considered a gas guzzler value here. Even for a gasoline powered mid sized car.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
Britain gets two things right: car purchases (usually) and traffic lights. I love that yellow-before-green thing.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
Huh? W'ah? Um, I think if people don't feel that $1,300 on top of the price of the car is worth it, they just won't buy new cars and the auto companies won't be paying off that investment.
09/15/09
*I don't support this, however if reducing fuel usage in this country is the goal, this is the way to do it.
09/15/09
07/27/09
It's other peoples money and I want it now!!
07/28/09
07/28/09
Being responsible does not pay, aparently.