@Dr.Danger needs food badly: There used to be a sign, in Prince George, BC, claiming that a particular spot was where Shel Silverstein got the inspiration for "Where the Sidewalk Ends". There's a particular sidewalk that starts out in the downtown core, heads up the middle of a busy four-lane divided roadway, then stops abruptly where the four lanes are no longer divided. It appears, at first glance, to be a viable path to walk if you want to head from the downtown to the business district on Central Street; however, if you follow it, you will not be able to cross the traffic, and will have to backtrack several blocks, and take another sidewalk two blocks over. Incidentally, just near that spot there used to be a candy store that sold fudge, ice cream -- and peppermint treats.
Local legend states that Shel Silverstein visited Prince George, got frustrated by this route, and wrote most of the poem that night in his hotel room.
Whether that's true or not, I have no idea. I've never been able to find any confirmation anywhere, but the locals are quite firm in their belief that it's true.
And whether it's true or not, it's kind of neat to stand in that spot and think of the poem. Thanks for rekindling some memories!
With that many tailpipes, the odds aren't looking great.
On a side note, can we ease off on the whole issue of California's CO2 standards already? Even we admit that they are fucking stringent, but if you had been to LA twenty years ago, you would understand why. It used to be that you couldn't spend more than a few minutes outside for fear of asphyxiation.
@Mad_Science: Not all smog is localized. Check out PM 2.5 pollutants. Mainly a regional issue, with some localized effects. And if you've ever seen the brown cloud blotting out LA or Denver, you wouldn't think it's so local.
But your last sentence doesn't make a lot of sense. If the brown cloud only blocks out LA or Denver, then that means it is local.
Back to my original point: the reason CA was granted a waiver for stricter smog controls is because CA (and a few other regions) have a justifiable interest in keeping pollutants low: a dense car population.
The logic doesn't apply to CO2 emissions. CA (and a dozen other states) changing their CO2 regs wouldn't mean a damn thing for overall greenhouse gas emissions.
This is more of a work-around for CA to use its market to set national policy by default, when maybe there isn't the political support for it on a national level.
@pauljones: I'm not saying it wasn't awful before (and sometimes still is awful), but now making further improvements has gotten to the point where it starts to become wringing blood out of a stone.
And yes, there should be uniform national (or, better yet, international) standards for emissions, fuel economy and crash safety.
@Mad_Science: LA's a region, not a locality. Unless you meant LA proper, but I don't think you did. It's not the entire world, but it's pretty big. I think that CO2 is misclassified as a pollutant. CO2 issues are more related to an imbalanced concentration in the atmosphere. You're right that CO2 effects are globally distributed, rather than local.
Reducing CO2 emissions has to start somewhere. California is a better place than plenty of others to start. It's not the whole package, but a start. Since the rest of the world wants to emulate Baywatch and Dallas, well let's give them something better to emulate, and eventually they'll come along.
China's CO2 is spiking now, but ours started 100 years ago, which is about how long it persists. It'll take some time and some doing to put the toothpaste back in the tube. But that's not a reason to throw the tube on the floor and step on it.
02/05/09
02/05/09
Soylent Edge is People! People!
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
And before the street begins,
And there the grass grows soft and white,
And there the sun burns crimson bright,
And there the moon-bird rests from his flight
To cool in the peppermint wind.
Let us leave this place where the smoke blows black
And the dark street winds and bends.
Past the pits where the asphalt flowers grow
We shall walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
And watch where the chalk-white arrows go
To the place where the sidewalk ends.
Yes we'll walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
And we'll go where the chalk-white arrows go,
For the children, they mark, and the children, they know
The place where the sidewalk ends.
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
Local legend states that Shel Silverstein visited Prince George, got frustrated by this route, and wrote most of the poem that night in his hotel room.
Whether that's true or not, I have no idea. I've never been able to find any confirmation anywhere, but the locals are quite firm in their belief that it's true.
And whether it's true or not, it's kind of neat to stand in that spot and think of the poem. Thanks for rekindling some memories!
02/06/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
With that many tailpipes, the odds aren't looking great.
On a side note, can we ease off on the whole issue of California's CO2 standards already? Even we admit that they are fucking stringent, but if you had been to LA twenty years ago, you would understand why. It used to be that you couldn't spend more than a few minutes outside for fear of asphyxiation.
02/05/09
Smog is localized, CO2 is not.
Curbing C02 emissions is a global issue, but at least within in the US, it should be a national law passed through the standard federal process.
02/05/09
02/05/09
But your last sentence doesn't make a lot of sense. If the brown cloud only blocks out LA or Denver, then that means it is local.
Back to my original point: the reason CA was granted a waiver for stricter smog controls is because CA (and a few other regions) have a justifiable interest in keeping pollutants low: a dense car population.
The logic doesn't apply to CO2 emissions. CA (and a dozen other states) changing their CO2 regs wouldn't mean a damn thing for overall greenhouse gas emissions.
This is more of a work-around for CA to use its market to set national policy by default, when maybe there isn't the political support for it on a national level.
02/05/09
And yes, there should be uniform national (or, better yet, international) standards for emissions, fuel economy and crash safety.
Finally, all of the above is JMHO.
02/05/09
Reducing CO2 emissions has to start somewhere. California is a better place than plenty of others to start. It's not the whole package, but a start. Since the rest of the world wants to emulate Baywatch and Dallas, well let's give them something better to emulate, and eventually they'll come along.
China's CO2 is spiking now, but ours started 100 years ago, which is about how long it persists. It'll take some time and some doing to put the toothpaste back in the tube. But that's not a reason to throw the tube on the floor and step on it.
02/05/09
Looks like it holds at least fourteen, but I'm not sure how many it seats.
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09
02/05/09