My Intermeccanica Speedster (whenever I get the damn engine back in) will be 1 foot longer than my '05 MINI Cooper. Width is about the same but height is much lower.
Man, I always figured the Dino was a giant, but I've never seen it alongside a new Ferrari.
I think the one main reason I have no desire to get a new car (save for an Exige, which I could never afford) is because they've all gotten so huge. Plus, 90% of them have a serious badonkadonk arse goin' on. That trend has got to stop.
Even the formerly economy-sized Carolla and Civic have gotten too chunky for me.
Even the Mustang has this problem, to a degree. The newer model has a slightly shorter wheelbase and longer overhangs... but it's six inches wider and three and a half inches taller.
It's the width that gets me. I parked a bit more than a foot from a back-of-the-lot Mustang GT a couple weeks ago, as a comparison, and was amazed by how wide it was compared to my Volvo (almost an extra 7"). It's only a couple inches shorter, too, and this is a fairly long car...
@MushyHeirloom: My local Ford dealer has a '64 or '65 Mustang convertible in their showroom - I haven't had the chance to see it against its modern counterpart, but Focii tower over it.
@Glenfiddich is good: Although in fairness, that's not model bloat. They consciously moved the Taurus out of the "mid-size" segment and into the "full-size" segment. If you're looking at size, the fair comparison is the old Taurus and the Fusion.
@Deartháir II: The Return: ah... I did not know that. Stiil a cool picture though. Especially since you can clearly see over the top of the old one from the new one.
@Jo Schmo has lost that commenting feeling: The seating height is also an artifact from the Five Hundred. The Five Hundred had, as one of (ok, maybe only) it's features being a seating position that was higher than a normal sedan to capture some of the SUV/CUV market.
All cars have grown quite dramatically, some worse than others. But that doesn't change the fact that the GT-R is large and shockingly heavy. I see them every so often and they barely register because they're nearly as large as your average family sedan.
Of course, it's probably unavoidable given all the safety requirements and technology crammed into these cars. You're far more likely to survive a crash in those new cars. And despite the size and, in some cases, weight increases modern cars dramatically out-perform old cars.
Really, the holy grail is to have everything we have in modern cars but use technology to make them significantly lighter. Of course, that's easier said than done and would make these cars even more expensive than they already are. And of course there's a level of luxury consumers have come to expect even in performance cars.
10/01/09
10/01/09
I think the one main reason I have no desire to get a new car (save for an Exige, which I could never afford) is because they've all gotten so huge. Plus, 90% of them have a serious badonkadonk arse goin' on. That trend has got to stop.
Even the formerly economy-sized Carolla and Civic have gotten too chunky for me.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
American cars have grown too, just not as much.
10/01/09
Even the Mustang has this problem, to a degree. The newer model has a slightly shorter wheelbase and longer overhangs... but it's six inches wider and three and a half inches taller.
It's the width that gets me. I parked a bit more than a foot from a back-of-the-lot Mustang GT a couple weeks ago, as a comparison, and was amazed by how wide it was compared to my Volvo (almost an extra 7"). It's only a couple inches shorter, too, and this is a fairly long car...
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
@My A-Arm: Foci are ridiculously tall anyway. I remember the first time my mother parked next to one with her old Contour - huge difference.
10/01/09
10/02/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
Then again, Armadas and Titans dwarf most actual 'cars'.
I'm still trying to understand how the Civic got to be significantly larger than the 1st and 2nd gen Accord.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
I'd swear this is someone playing with distance and depth-of-focus, but I know it isn't.
Depressing.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
Funny you mention this, 'cause this weekend, I saw a brand-new Fusion and thought, "the new Taurus doesn't look huge..."
/forehead slap
10/01/09
10/01/09
Not too bad compared to modern examples of bloat.
10/01/09
I find this pic more startling:
10/01/09
Of course, it's probably unavoidable given all the safety requirements and technology crammed into these cars. You're far more likely to survive a crash in those new cars. And despite the size and, in some cases, weight increases modern cars dramatically out-perform old cars.
Really, the holy grail is to have everything we have in modern cars but use technology to make them significantly lighter. Of course, that's easier said than done and would make these cars even more expensive than they already are. And of course there's a level of luxury consumers have come to expect even in performance cars.
10/01/09
Yeah, they may have put on some weight, but they're still heroes to me, dammit.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
@1000songs: