So...it has less power than the 350 in my 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass (355hp/425ft/lbs) and is more expensive to maintain and service too? Sorry, but that Ferrari engine does nothing for me. I doubt it is even that much lighter than the SBC. The chassis on the other hand is light years ahead of my aging G body.
'Tapping from the left cylinder bank': that usually goes for about one grand per tap. I hope this fellow takes his placidil before the service manager calls to 'discuss' their findings.
We could get that out of a V6 in our Honda NSX's back then too, when you consider Ferrari usually overstates their power output. And they didn't have to be rebuilt every 30k miles.
I don't know, this doesn't actually look that bad. There is a big difference between having to work on a car that was designed to be worked on, like a racecar, and one that was designed to be an appliance, like a Camry. Yes, you have to remove a major subassembly to perform the work but it looks like it is relatively straightforward to do it, kinda like dropping the drivetrain out of a VW Bug or an aircooled non-turbo Porsche. Not bad, especially if you have a lift.
This is why you rarely see an exotic with more than 30,000 miles. BTW the mid 70s Chevy Monza V8 was nearly as fussy. It required you to partially remove the engine to get at all the spark plugs.
@handyr: Chevy wasn't doing any better in the 1990s. You had to drop the motor down from the bottom to get to the two rear spark plugs in a 4th gen F-body V-8. GM just installed the alleged 100k miles plugs and said screw you after that. $1200 for a tuneup on a Z-28!
@P161911 misses weekday Murilee: It was the same in the Seventies. GM V-8s had two inaccessible plugs under the AC compressor. If you were skinny and flexible and had the right wrenches, you might be able to wrestle those plugs out. With a tune up going for about $50 then, there weren't too many motivated mechanics Most cars never had those plugs changed.
@handyr: SVT contour...to change the clutch one must pull the engine and drop the front sub-frame. I suppose thats what i get for buying a 90s fwd car.
@Syrax wonders where layabout is: I'm with you. I love the 328 for all of its '80s goodness. The 355 is the first (and last) "modern" Ferrari that I can say that I truly like the styling of.
The 348 is still cool, but is overshadowed by its older and younger siblings.
@Sloop_John_B: Before I was born, my mother had a Dodge Dart Swinger benefiting from a v8 from the previous owner. You had to hoist the engine to replace the last two spark plugs. Now that's exclusivity!
03/10/09
03/10/09
CARS GONE WILD!
03/10/09
03/10/09
I prefer Cars With Low Self Esteem, myself...
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
Dirty girl!
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
'Tapping from the left cylinder bank': that usually goes for about one grand per tap. I hope this fellow takes his placidil before the service manager calls to 'discuss' their findings.
03/10/09
My, my, look how far technology has come. We can get that out of a V6 in our Honda Accords and Toyota Camrys nowadays.
Not to mention MOAR power out of a turbo V6 in a Taurus.
Who would have thunk?
03/10/09
We could get that out of a V6 in our Honda NSX's back then too, when you consider Ferrari usually overstates their power output. And they didn't have to be rebuilt every 30k miles.
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
Step 1 - Unbolt subframe and remove engine...
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
The 348 is still cool, but is overshadowed by its older and younger siblings.
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09
348 = rich man's Fiat
03/10/09
03/10/09
03/10/09