One of the coolest variants of the F-18 is the X-53 Active Aeroelastic Wing research craft used by NASA. I actually got to see it at NASA Dryden many years ago when it was being prepped for flight. Basically, it is a F/A-18 with a wing more similar to the original wing. This wing was replaced early on in the development because it was too thin and not rigid enough. They took a pair of these wings and modified them with actuators and controllers. They can then warp the wing shape in flight which changes the flight dynamics of the aircraft. It's pretty cool stuff for aero weenies like me.
@pauljones: Yeah, that is a bizarre aircraft, but totally cool. In my senior design project in college we wound up using canards on our airplane for stability. Our payload was located such that a traditional tailplane was unstable due to the rotation about the CG.
That is one sexy jet, though. Not as sexy as the F-14 that went before it, which remains the Megan Fox of fighter jets, but I wouldn't say no to a chance to take one of these for a spin.
@BaconSandwich: One misshapen thumb. One. And you know what? Misshapen thumb or no, you'd be all over that, and so would I; just like I'd be all over an F-14A, TF30s or not.
@The5thElephant: Umm...do you have any familiarity with the F-14 design at all?
The F-14 is actually extremely agile at low speeds, so much so that baring the S-3, it was one of the easiest jets to land on a carrier. Granted, the F/A-18 has a slightly better instantaneous turn rate, but that has more to do with the fact it has a FBW system, while the F-14 is hydraulic.
Also, I, too, like my planes the way I like my women: once I turn the throttle up, I like them to be able to go for a while. Not something that F/A-18 can do all that well.
@pauljones: The FBW system on the F/A-18 is still hydraulic. The difference is the computer controls the valves on the F/A-18 and on the F-14 mechanical cables control the valves.
The Navy is unhappy at the Government's purchase of so many fleet Chevy Uplanders, they decide to take their rage out at the source.
Detroit: So shitty, pilots believe their in Iraq.
GM tries to remind the nation of their supplying the Allies by hiring a flyover, then quickly aborts after realizing that the majority of the plane is built overseas. Epic fail.
That's all I got. That Saab joke just stole my thunder.
07/15/09
07/15/09
Have you ever seen the HiMAT demonstrators? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiMAT
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
I like my planes the way I like my women, slim, sleek, maneuverable, and not TOO fast, with properly angled vertical stabilizers = F/A-18.
07/15/09
The F-14 is actually extremely agile at low speeds, so much so that baring the S-3, it was one of the easiest jets to land on a carrier. Granted, the F/A-18 has a slightly better instantaneous turn rate, but that has more to do with the fact it has a FBW system, while the F-14 is hydraulic.
Also, I, too, like my planes the way I like my women: once I turn the throttle up, I like them to be able to go for a while. Not something that F/A-18 can do all that well.
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
07/15/09
06/12/09
06/13/09
06/12/09
No, wait. It's GM.
Nothing's coming in.
06/12/09
The Navy is unhappy at the Government's purchase of so many fleet Chevy Uplanders, they decide to take their rage out at the source.
Detroit: So shitty, pilots believe their in Iraq.
GM tries to remind the nation of their supplying the Allies by hiring a flyover, then quickly aborts after realizing that the majority of the plane is built overseas. Epic fail.
That's all I got. That Saab joke just stole my thunder.
06/12/09
There should be a T-Rex in the cockpit.
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09
06/12/09