This sort of thing is always guaranteed to start a storm of controversy, what with beauty being in the eye of the beholder, but I can't complain about most of these choices. Still, I think it's silly that Massini takes rarity into account when picking the "most beautiful" Ferraris. Rarity has nothing to do with beauty. It affects value, sure, but we're not looking at the most expensive, or most important. We're going for beautiful, and that means that it needs to make your heart stop when you look at it.
I'll cast my vote for the 250GTO. It was a successful racer and they're rare, but if they had built ten thousand and powered them with Fiat 1100 motors, they'd still be drop-dead gorgeous.
@RachelSklar: Yes, that's it. I don't know if Mr. Massini had any phallacentric criteria, but most 50's and early 60's sports cars have a "mannish" quality to them.
@scroggzilla raids again: I see "mannish" as "big mahogany desk and dark leather chair" with a side of "humidor" and "gun collection." This to me suggests "giant melty creamsicle." Or, er, something. Never mind.
@RachelSklar: If you think that's bad, check out the Jaguar E-Type. Fortunately, many of them were green, which makes them look more like a pickle than a phallus.
Not a bad list. I'm not sure I'd put the 375 Mille Miglia Spider as the most "beautiful". It was certainly important, but it's not necessarily beautiful.
I'm surprised at how many variants of the 250 there were on the list. Sure, the 250 is quite ubiquitous and the variants are all lovely, but I would, in the interest of variety, have included some other series. For instance, the '57 410 SuperAmerica shown above. Rare, beautiful, powerful and desirable.
Also, there is a lack of flat-12 representation in their list.
@engineerd: +1 on the 410 SuperAmerica. I saw one in a restoration shop once-- it's got presence, that's for sure.
Just out of curiosity, what's your preference in the flat-12 area-- seventies swoopiness from the 512bb or eighties muscle from the Testarossa?
I love that particular 375MM...it's the car that Phil Hill and Ritchie Ginther drove in the 54 Carrera. But more beautiful than the 250 GTO (1st or 2nd series?)...or the P3/4...or the 275 GTB...or the 156 Sharknose F1...246 Dino F1...250TR...250 SWB?
@LBJ's Love Child: I was glad to see Syrax make this the first post down below, and was satisfied, but your picture is stunning like an unexpected storm door. Odd that such beauty is so difficult to fully capture on film.
10/01/09
I'll cast my vote for the 250GTO. It was a successful racer and they're rare, but if they had built ten thousand and powered them with Fiat 1100 motors, they'd still be drop-dead gorgeous.
10/01/09
10/01/09
It's at least in the Top 5 Most Beautifu Carsl Ever, so it certainly tops the Ferrari list.
10/01/09
10/01/09
In other news, CNBC says Sarah Jessica Parker is the hottest woman of 2009!
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
[www.supercars.net]
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
Really? A Daytona and the Enzo above the 250 GT Lusso? Really? I wouldn't even have the Enzo on this list.
Like my colleagues have suggested, I would have the GT Lusso as the most beautiful Ferrari of all time.
10/01/09
I'm surprised at how many variants of the 250 there were on the list. Sure, the 250 is quite ubiquitous and the variants are all lovely, but I would, in the interest of variety, have included some other series. For instance, the '57 410 SuperAmerica shown above. Rare, beautiful, powerful and desirable.
Also, there is a lack of flat-12 representation in their list.
10/01/09
Just out of curiosity, what's your preference in the flat-12 area-- seventies swoopiness from the 512bb or eighties muscle from the Testarossa?
10/01/09
Secondly, 275 GTS/4 NART Spider FTW:
10/01/09
10/01/09
[www.flickr.com]
10/01/09
And finally, #3 on my Top #3, the 250 GTL Berlinetta. I'd have 4, but my failure to buy a 206 Dino for $10K in 1977 makes me hate it now.
10/01/09