I'm going to pop open a cold one on the day GM officially announces there will never be a Chevy Volt mass produced for the 'Merican consumer. #laautoshow
@Ford Tempo Fanatic: I'll just wearily shake my head. Then I'll pop a bottle of whiskey, but not necessarily out of a sense of celebration. #laautoshow
@that ain't the way to have fun, son:
It's available in Europe already, with a 2 liter turbodiesel with 150 HP. It's not very economical though, for European standards that is.
When are they going to figure out that just because it doesn't NEED a grill, it should still get one. Otherwise it looks like a slab of concrete........as shown in the picture!
@slysolstice07: The only reason the nose end of these EVs are flat like this is because there would ordinarily be a radiator behind it. No radiator means the nose can be shaped more like that of an aircraft - parabolic in shape so as to be more aerodynamic.
Do mid-engined sports cars have grilles? Hell no. Why should EVs?
I'm not going to comment on the styling, that's been covered.
However, think about what you would do if you were building a new company and needed a platform. Would you design your own? Do you have the capital to invest in design, engineering, modeling, tooling, plant space, prototyping, testing, etc.? Probably not. Instead, you can start off with another company's platform, license it from them, give it your own look and focus on what you set out to do. This is the route Musk took with Tesla. He licensed a Lotus platform for the Roadster.
However, if you're going to go to the trouble, why not license a platform that has proven popular over the years? A platform that can claim to be the best selling in it's class for 30+ years? One that is useful, if not flashy?
@engineerd: Out! Out with your logic and rational business plans! We're supposed to build hype and vaporware and net us some buzzword venture capital like it's 1999!
Actually you pegged it... in fact I meant to say the same thing in a subsequent post (before my AMC-dig got me flogged).
The styling isn't something that can't be fixed with a proper sense of scale: make the lights a little bigger to fill up that massive void, and you'd have something a bit more palatable IMHO.
Also, their logo is rather clever, once you figure it out.
@engineerd: They even went to an established company with expertise in multi-voltage wiring in mobile platforms (Gulf Stream Coach) for startup money and assistance with technical issues...
@engineerd: You know what's funny about this post, Mike Levine (from PickupTrucks.com) and I were talking about hybrids a while ago and how perfect pickups are for the tech while nobody's really doing it (GM light hybrids don't really count). Plenty of space between the frame rails for huge batteries, plenty of fleet buyers interested in high fuel economy and able to write of higher prices, a severe duty cycle to prove your hybrid system, easier platforms to work with, etc. Not only that but improving fuel economy as a percentage provides much greater fuel savings over a car hybrid.
@Ben Wojdyla: I've always thought pickups, delivery trucks, and even large SUVs to a certain extent provide the best place for hybrid technology to be exploited. For exactly the reasons you stated.
UPS agrees (in clever fashion, I might add). [www.cnn.com]
@Feds: I think you can get normal colors now, but you still have to get hybrid badges that are three times that of the normal models. Ya know, so everyone can see that you're saving the world and all.
Good Idea, Bad Execution. The front end is definately more aerodynamic because of these changes, but it looks really sad, like it wants to be put out of its misery.
Is is 'based' on a Ford F-150 or is it an F-150 to start with? I'm a little confused (what else is new?) Whichever way it is, this has to be the ugliest front end I've ever seen.
That sound you hear? Way off in the distance there? That's the Cry of a Thousand D'ohs, accompanied by the percussive report of foreheads being slapped (and hopefully some rolling), echoing through the tubes of GM's Detriot Ren-Cen.
Because some heretofore unheard-of, fly-by-night electro-tuner shop has now outclassed the Volt by 20 MPGe. With a truck.
230 is certainly sounding like a less magical number with each passing day.
Memo to GM: Underpromise. Overdeliver. And - at the risk of great pun-ditude, keep your competitors in the dark!
Yes, maybe someone (like Lotus themselves?) could show up Tesla by putting this Lotus engine and half as many batteries as the Roadster in the Elise chassis, saving about 175 kg and thus potentially giving better acceleration. The mystery with every range-extender is what it's like to drive with a powerful depleted battery and a weak generator. Stay away from long inclines.
Tesla toyed with a hybrid/range-extended version of the Model S, but they've stayed battery-only with three range options (batteries, moah batteries and DAMN that's a lot of batteries). Nor is Fisker a customer/competitor for this tiny engine, 35 kW is nothing compared to the 194 kW 2.0L turbo GM engine that will supposedly be in the Fisker Karma. Even the range-extender 1.4 L in the Chevy Volt is 53 kW, a lot more than 35 kW.
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
Oh, and it'd last forever...or until some bonehead put gasoline in it a 15th time. #laautoshow
11/18/09
It's available in Europe already, with a 2 liter turbodiesel with 150 HP. It's not very economical though, for European standards that is.
11/18/09
Grrrrr.
#tips
11/17/09
90' 5.0 L02 v8 (Base): 140 hp
We did come a long way. #laautoshow
11/17/09
This year we get some run of the mill Chevy and a Toyota van. #laautoshow
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
Do mid-engined sports cars have grilles? Hell no. Why should EVs?
09/08/09
However, think about what you would do if you were building a new company and needed a platform. Would you design your own? Do you have the capital to invest in design, engineering, modeling, tooling, plant space, prototyping, testing, etc.? Probably not. Instead, you can start off with another company's platform, license it from them, give it your own look and focus on what you set out to do. This is the route Musk took with Tesla. He licensed a Lotus platform for the Roadster.
However, if you're going to go to the trouble, why not license a platform that has proven popular over the years? A platform that can claim to be the best selling in it's class for 30+ years? One that is useful, if not flashy?
Good job, EMC. You're doing it right.
09/08/09
Actually you pegged it... in fact I meant to say the same thing in a subsequent post (before my AMC-dig got me flogged).
The styling isn't something that can't be fixed with a proper sense of scale: make the lights a little bigger to fill up that massive void, and you'd have something a bit more palatable IMHO.
Also, their logo is rather clever, once you figure it out.
09/08/09
this is crazy enough that it might just work!
09/08/09
09/08/09
UPS agrees (in clever fashion, I might add). [www.cnn.com]
09/08/09
Aa-aahh!
He's for every one of us!
Stand for every one of us!
He save with a mighty hand
Every man every woman
Every child in the land, he's Flash!
(with great love and respect to Queen)
I don't care what you guys say. A fullsize getting anything better than 30mpg is worth a headline.
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
Is black allowed on hybrids, or does it have to be grey or algae green?
09/09/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
Because some heretofore unheard-of, fly-by-night electro-tuner shop has now outclassed the Volt by 20 MPGe. With a truck.
230 is certainly sounding like a less magical number with each passing day.
Memo to GM: Underpromise. Overdeliver. And - at the risk of great pun-ditude, keep your competitors in the dark!
09/08/09
09/08/09
Yes, maybe someone (like Lotus themselves?) could show up Tesla by putting this Lotus engine and half as many batteries as the Roadster in the Elise chassis, saving about 175 kg and thus potentially giving better acceleration. The mystery with every range-extender is what it's like to drive with a powerful depleted battery and a weak generator. Stay away from long inclines.
Tesla toyed with a hybrid/range-extended version of the Model S, but they've stayed battery-only with three range options (batteries, moah batteries and DAMN that's a lot of batteries). Nor is Fisker a customer/competitor for this tiny engine, 35 kW is nothing compared to the 194 kW 2.0L turbo GM engine that will supposedly be in the Fisker Karma. Even the range-extender 1.4 L in the Chevy Volt is 53 kW, a lot more than 35 kW.