FP: Your Volvo is awesome! Anyway promoted this comment
☠Grяrяrяrяrя, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. was starred
☠Grяrяrяrяrя, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. was unstarred
"The administration estimated the requirements would cost up to $1,300 per new vehicle by 2016 - but that it would take just three years to pay off that investment"
Huh? W'ah? Um, I think if people don't feel that $1,300 on top of the price of the car is worth it, they just won't buy new cars and the auto companies won't be paying off that investment.
@LoganSix: Exactly why CAFE is a failure. It tries to force the carmakers to build cars that Congress -- not consumers in general -- want. If our government was really serious about this they would raise the gas tax*. However, this is considered political suicide, particularly at this time. Instead, they make the cowardly and politically expedient move of putting the onus on the car companies to ensure their sales meet some arbitrary average fuel economy regardless of what people will actually buy.
*I don't support this, however if reducing fuel usage in this country is the goal, this is the way to do it.
Oddly, my car's not listed but shows up as 19MPG under the old rules and 18MPG (and therefore eligible, I think) under the new ones - 1999 Lexus RX300 AWD. Looks like I'm going turbodiesel shopping.
ok i somewhat agree with the lists - i call bullshit on the old crown vics being ineligible and i foresee a future of e30 BMW's being killed off by the hundreds
people, just bring them to the junkyard do you really want to piss off uncle Sam?
@urbanturban666: More to the point, what were they smoking when they thought someone would trade in these:
86 2004 Mazda RX-8
78 1996 Mitsubishi 3000 GT Spyder
44 1991 BMW M3
17 1987 Porsche 911
@mustang5507: You would be surprised of the number of people that think 60,000 miles on a car is long in the tooth. Hell, of all the cars I have had, I can count on one hand how many I purchased that had less than 100,000 on the odometer. I don't think I could ever junk something that was still in any running condition. I would rather give it to a charity if it came down to it.
@TurboRefrigerator:My grandfather just gave away his not-so-great 87,000-mile '97 Mystique to charity. The flatbed that came to get it had the name of an auto recycling company on the door. Either they rented/bought and didn't debadge the wrecker, or someone at said charity is amazingly dense, as the car's worth several hundred bucks running and a lot less as scrap.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
Britain gets two things right: car purchases (usually) and traffic lights. I love that yellow-before-green thing.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
Huh? W'ah? Um, I think if people don't feel that $1,300 on top of the price of the car is worth it, they just won't buy new cars and the auto companies won't be paying off that investment.
09/15/09
*I don't support this, however if reducing fuel usage in this country is the goal, this is the way to do it.
09/15/09
07/29/09
So, you're on the "table" and the end has been sawed off your femur--oops, the list just changed.
07/29/09
But thanks for playing the random poorly-informed opinion game!
07/29/09
07/29/09
people, just bring them to the junkyard do you really want to piss off uncle Sam?
07/29/09
07/29/09
86 2004 Mazda RX-8
78 1996 Mitsubishi 3000 GT Spyder
44 1991 BMW M3
17 1987 Porsche 911
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/28/09
-Buick Grand National
-(clean) Merc E-class
-(clean) Ford Thunderbird SC
-BMW M3
-Mitsu 3000GT spyder
o.O??
07/28/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
07/28/09
There is something bad wrong with that list.