Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
Well, that absurd pricing makes the Volt, even if it ends up being 40K, quite the bargain....not to mention every other car ever sold, barring the Veyron.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
$49,900 FOR A SMART CAR? I didn't even notice that when I first read the post, that's insane. Besides being electric what else does it come with. It better have automatic ball washers, blonde ones,-----------you know like the carts at the golf course charity events.
So it's a half price Tesla roadster with a Mercedes warranty. If it has decent city performance (which it should with an electric motor), it could be successful.
How bad is Tesla's financial problems? If they are going to save their company by building 1,000 battery packs they are either only a couple million from solvency or those are going to be some damn expensive batteries.
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was starred
Mike the Dog is sitting by the door with a pair of cow slippers, and a very sad face. was unstarred
I imagine having actual orders, outside of their direct need, for other customers, etc., would drive the manufacturing costs down enough so that they could then turn a profit on their own cars.
It would also help iron out all the supply and engineering issues, spreading the R&D cost around more units. Initial costs for Tesla would then be lower, leading to a higher margin, etc.
At the very least they might make back some of the millions they've dropped on their own car already, even if it flops and they can't move any.
Wow, looks like you guys might have a real ride that is road legal for next years Detroit show.
Of course, that would be if anyone would let you drive around the hall again.
Speaking of that, don't the plastic side windows on that car (the Gem) remind you of something out of a fast foot restaurants playland?
I've had the misfortune to drive one of those, and between it and the Miles EV both are not something I would use outdoors with other cars. Or with people for that matter. Actually, I don't think I would sit in one without at least the secret service guarding me on all four corners and snipers stationed lest I get photographed in one.
@Deartháir: a Cruder, Fart-Joke Version of graverobber: I already see them a couple times a week here in Birmingham (nearest dealer: 2.5 hours). And we have virtually no need* for them, but we do have a very fashion-conscious populace.
*"need" defined here as: ability to park them nose-first in parallel spots, which is not allowed; or advantage when motoring in tight quarters, of which we have almost none
We don't care much for them because they are simply far too expensive for what they offer, and their gas mileage really isn't all that impressively better than most econoboxes that are available for much cheaper.
Say you get a Yaris. It may lose about 8 mpg to the Smart, but the cost of entry is several grand less, and that several grand buys quite a bit of gas. Cost of ownership is also significantly cheaper on the Yaris, taking into account everything from parts, maintenance, insurance, and so on. Plus, the Yaris has a good deal more room for groceries, etc.
As cool as those little Smart cars may be, they are just completely impractical in every sense of the word, and not at all a good fit for the US market, where as Sloop_John_B points out, was made primarily for more modern vehicles and long-distance travel is much, much more common than Europe or Canada.
@pauljones: Wait, you guys don't get the 3cyl diesel, do you? I believe you only get the much-less efficient gas engine.
That would explain it, if so. The smarts up here are little diesels that get damn good mileage, but I remember someone saying they couldn't offer those in the 'States, which is why we got them about 3 or 4 years earlier.
And... dude, I like you, I respect you, but...
long-distance travel is much, much more common than [...] Canada.
Allow me, however, to qualify my above statement regarding long-distance travel:
Canada exceeds the US in terms of physical size. There is no denying it. But the population in Canada is significantly smaller than the US, and it is all concentrated in a belt along the Southern half of the country that is approximately the distance between Seattle and Maine.
The US population, which is not only much larger, is also much more spread out as a result of having more reasonably populable (I think I just invented a word), or accessible to to population, than Canada has.
The combined effect is that the size the entire US, though smaller than Canada, is nothing to be sneezed at, and I would say that in terms of areas easily-accessible to population, the US matches or exceeds Canada's capacity. This in, turn, means that we have a larger population spread out over a greater area than Canada, and so my guess is that long-distance travel is more common in the US, if only by sheer number.
@Deartháir: a Cruder, Fart-Joke Version of graverobber: My company car, a 3cyl. Turbo Diesel Smart gets wicked mileage, but is not worth a shit in snow deeper than 5 cm / 2 inches. The ESP kicks in waaaay too much when you're stuck in the snow, so much so that I'd love to pack the little bitch full of C4 and blow it to Hell! Just sayin'.
@POLAЯ WILL COVEЯ THE TOЯONTO AUTO SHOW! for a small fee.: That's a Mercedes thing, they all do that, not just the Smart. My C-class spent so much time nannying me, I would just turn traction-control off every time I got in... and because it's a Mercedes, it wouldn't go "all the way" off.
@pauljones: Okay, a fair argument, but also flawed, to my mind. You have a lot more people, so long-distance travel is more common. True. But the average driver, definitely not, for exactly the reasons you give.
Where I lived before, the nearest major shopping center was a 9-hour drive away. And that's not even getting into some of the really rural parts of Canada. And what was between my town and that one? Pretty much nothing.
Even some of our cities. Vancouver is only, what, 3M people? It takes a solid 3 hours to go from one extreme side to the other. We build out, not up.
Factor in the fact that something like 90% of the money in this country is made way out in the rural areas, and the average car in Canada does a LOT of highway miles.
I had no idea that there was a lot rural areas in Canada. Being a SoCal wuss (and it is a balmy 78 degrees F right now), I figured than anywhere with a higher latitude than Calgary was pretty damn inhospitable. Out of curiosity, what is the northern most city in Canada?
@pauljones: To me, anything north of Iowa is inhospitable unless it's near the ocean.
When my mom's great grandparents first came to north america from poland, they settled in central Canada, in Saskatchewan. I believe they left for the warmth of Minnesota shortly thereafter...to put it in perspective.
@pauljones: Depends on what you mean by "city". They've changed all the names to Inuit words now, but I think it used to be called Resolute Bay, or Alert Bay or something. About 500 miles from the North Pole. Other than that, Yellowknife, Inuvik, Coppermine... there are quite a few cities way up north, but the populations are small. all well less than 50,000, and most under 10,000. Some as few as 50-100 people. The furthest north I've been is only a town called Fort Nelson, which is only about as far north as Juneau, AK, (or the northern tip of Scotland, for you Europeans).
I lived about 50 miles from Alaska, and it was mild, temperate, and overall quite pleasant weather... just too rainy. But a normal weekend trip would have been the same as doing a round trip from Orlando, FL to Philadelphia, PA... or, LA to Portland, OR. And that was just to hit up a Costco.
@Deartháir: a Cruder, Fart-Joke Version of graverobber: I lied on those comparisons, because Google abruptly changed the units of measure from KMs to miles without asking me. And rather than bugger around, I'm going to guess, probably, say, NYC to Columbus Ohio? or LA to Salt Lake City?
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
There are a bunch of the gasoline versions around Ann Arbor, but that shouldn't surprise anyone who's spent any time there.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
...in the world.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
How bad is Tesla's financial problems? If they are going to save their company by building 1,000 battery packs they are either only a couple million from solvency or those are going to be some damn expensive batteries.
01/13/09
How bad ARE Tesla's financial problems?
01/13/09
[/pedantry]
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
I imagine having actual orders, outside of their direct need, for other customers, etc., would drive the manufacturing costs down enough so that they could then turn a profit on their own cars.
It would also help iron out all the supply and engineering issues, spreading the R&D cost around more units. Initial costs for Tesla would then be lower, leading to a higher margin, etc.
At the very least they might make back some of the millions they've dropped on their own car already, even if it flops and they can't move any.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
And a wheelie bar, of course.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
Search "Smartuki" on youtube.
01/13/09
01/13/09
I suppose sex by myself doesn't count...
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
I guess midgets can be fun, too, in some completely perverted way.
01/13/09
Of course, that would be if anyone would let you drive around the hall again.
Speaking of that, don't the plastic side windows on that car (the Gem) remind you of something out of a fast foot restaurants playland?
I've had the misfortune to drive one of those, and between it and the Miles EV both are not something I would use outdoors with other cars. Or with people for that matter. Actually, I don't think I would sit in one without at least the secret service guarding me on all four corners and snipers stationed lest I get photographed in one.
01/13/09
They'd have a better chance of making real, actual money if they opened up a lemonade stand.
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
01/13/09
*"need" defined here as: ability to park them nose-first in parallel spots, which is not allowed; or advantage when motoring in tight quarters, of which we have almost none
01/13/09
We don't care much for them because they are simply far too expensive for what they offer, and their gas mileage really isn't all that impressively better than most econoboxes that are available for much cheaper.
Say you get a Yaris. It may lose about 8 mpg to the Smart, but the cost of entry is several grand less, and that several grand buys quite a bit of gas. Cost of ownership is also significantly cheaper on the Yaris, taking into account everything from parts, maintenance, insurance, and so on. Plus, the Yaris has a good deal more room for groceries, etc.
As cool as those little Smart cars may be, they are just completely impractical in every sense of the word, and not at all a good fit for the US market, where as Sloop_John_B points out, was made primarily for more modern vehicles and long-distance travel is much, much more common than Europe or Canada.
01/13/09
That would explain it, if so. The smarts up here are little diesels that get damn good mileage, but I remember someone saying they couldn't offer those in the 'States, which is why we got them about 3 or 4 years earlier.
And... dude, I like you, I respect you, but...
long-distance travel is much, much more common than [...] Canada.
Man... you need a map.
01/13/09
Apart from trucks, you have the VW Jetta and Mercedes E320cdi. That's all. BMW has the 330d coming out soon.
01/13/09
No, we only get the petrol engine.
Allow me, however, to qualify my above statement regarding long-distance travel:
Canada exceeds the US in terms of physical size. There is no denying it. But the population in Canada is significantly smaller than the US, and it is all concentrated in a belt along the Southern half of the country that is approximately the distance between Seattle and Maine.
The US population, which is not only much larger, is also much more spread out as a result of having more reasonably populable (I think I just invented a word), or accessible to to population, than Canada has.
The combined effect is that the size the entire US, though smaller than Canada, is nothing to be sneezed at, and I would say that in terms of areas easily-accessible to population, the US matches or exceeds Canada's capacity. This in, turn, means that we have a larger population spread out over a greater area than Canada, and so my guess is that long-distance travel is more common in the US, if only by sheer number.
01/13/09
Just sayin'.
01/13/09
Packing it with C4 is and blowing it up is just so cliche.
The least we could do is try to put it in geosynchronous orbit.
01/13/09
@pauljones: Okay, a fair argument, but also flawed, to my mind. You have a lot more people, so long-distance travel is more common. True. But the average driver, definitely not, for exactly the reasons you give.
Where I lived before, the nearest major shopping center was a 9-hour drive away. And that's not even getting into some of the really rural parts of Canada. And what was between my town and that one? Pretty much nothing.
Even some of our cities. Vancouver is only, what, 3M people? It takes a solid 3 hours to go from one extreme side to the other. We build out, not up.
Factor in the fact that something like 90% of the money in this country is made way out in the rural areas, and the average car in Canada does a LOT of highway miles.
I did 50,000 kms in the last year and a half.
01/13/09
A nine-hour drive? Gawddamn.
I had no idea that there was a lot rural areas in Canada. Being a SoCal wuss (and it is a balmy 78 degrees F right now), I figured than anywhere with a higher latitude than Calgary was pretty damn inhospitable. Out of curiosity, what is the northern most city in Canada?
01/13/09
When my mom's great grandparents first came to north america from poland, they settled in central Canada, in Saskatchewan. I believe they left for the warmth of Minnesota shortly thereafter...to put it in perspective.
01/13/09
I lived about 50 miles from Alaska, and it was mild, temperate, and overall quite pleasant weather... just too rainy. But a normal weekend trip would have been the same as doing a round trip from Orlando, FL to Philadelphia, PA... or, LA to Portland, OR. And that was just to hit up a Costco.
01/13/09
01/13/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
would be considered the northernmost city.
01/13/09
01/13/09