Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #dodgechallengergt more →
Vizualtech Renders Dodge Challenger GT
| posts about #dodgechallengergt more → |
Vizualtech Renders Dodge Challenger GT |
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
Personally I'll take the black "Hemicrazy" with silver ghost flames on the roof and "392 cu in" callout on the rear quarters. Daddy likes.
12/18/08
I've still not moved on, and am patiently waiting for a Hendrix Experience reunion tour.
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
As far as the Challenger's size goes, though, let's not forget that the Skylines were some big coupes, too, and they have had their share of successes, to say the least.
12/18/08
12/18/08
R34: 1540 kg
GT-R: 1730 kg (3814 lbs)
Challenger: 4041 lbs.
Yeah, okay, so it is a bit of a porker. But still, strip out all of the unnecessary crap, and I bet you could get it down to a competitive weight. As far as physical dimensions go, the r34 was a surprisingly big car in person, and the Challenger is certainly no larger than the GT-R, which will be competing, if I recall correctly.
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
Yes, I, too, thought that the GT-R looked like a horribly mutated skin tumor in person, as well. :)
I have seen several of the new Challengers around, as well as GT-Rs (can't help it when you live in LA close to the beach), and gawd I liked the looks of the Challenger in person. The GT-R...not so much.
12/18/08
........Challenger vs. GT-R
Length 16.5ft vs. 15.3ft
Width 6.3ft vs. 6.22ft
Height 4.75ft vs. 4.5ft
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08
12/18/08