If you RTFA, it's not as much of a scam as it's positioned:
"Benvenuti also said Dodge truck engineers followed new testing protocols established by the Society of Automotive Engineers and a group of truck manufacturers to standardize tow testing....."
And
"Dodge isn’t the first manufacturer to magically increase the tow rating of its half-ton pickup without changing hardware. Ford pulled a similar move when it upped the 2008 Ford F-150's max tow rating to 11,000 pounds from 9,900 pounds the year before, after the 2007 Toyota Tundra arrived with a 10,800-pound tow rating."
Not to defend Dodge, nor that the image with Ray as a pixie is not funny...... it's just not quite as insidious as positioned.
Even changing tires or wheels can change the GCWR and thus tow ratings from year to year.
@pinzgauer: I was surprised to see the differences in tow ratings for the 17" wheels vs the 10" wheels. I guess it does effectively change the gearing of the truck though.
So Ray, this is why you needed a poster who has Photoshop skills. (I know that will cost me some good will in here.... ahhhh but what the hell, Ray can take it as much as he gives it)
@bmoreDLJ: Actually it will slowly begin disintegrating down to its basic elements. But Dodges already do that quickly enough so you shouldn't try testing this.
This one time, I did a new lab experiment, crunched some numbers, and came up with an acceptable if low end result. Since the experiment was a new set up and I had a deadline for submitting the lab setup and expected results, I turned it in, and while some students got higher numbers, the science was still sound and it didn't keep anyone from performing the new experiment successfully and safely.
Over the course of the next year, I had some spare time, so I repeated the experiment I had laid out for the students. Low and behold, I found that my original results were too low! What to do, I thought? Right now, the numbers aren't quite right-I shouldn't list anything less than my best answers, even if what I have down isn't hurting anyone and errors on the side of caution. Plus, all the manuals we printed off already have my original results in them! I decided to just put the more accurate numbers in next year's edition.
Then some snarky, nitpicking blog noticed my changes and made some insulting photoshops. Thank goodness I corrected my previous work.
This doesn't shock me a bit. For years I've wondered why my FWD sedan only allowed 2,000#, while Europeans with the same car were rated up to...wait for it...2,000kg!
People can make all the Nanny State jokes they want, but the litigators own this country. Six of one, half dozen of another.
wow I guess you fools have never heard of clever marketing before. You Jalo readers if you just read the other thread about this youd realize this whole magical increase shit is being blown out of proportion. Jalo thinks its some magical work of merlin or some shit.Um hello Chrysler is aware that people will make a truck with better towing capacity. SOooO they lie about the numbers. Jeez some of you people on this site are just so damn naive.
So Dodge can sprinkle this on people and they will defend Dodge to the death on a blog that is roughly 90% jokes about the editor fucking a car or Wes having a nice ass.
Jo Schmo *Now with more bacon! promoted this comment
Prawo Jazdy and The Velocity Trumpets: I miss Deartháir II was starred
Prawo Jazdy and The Velocity Trumpets: I miss Deartháir II was unstarred
07/29/09
I thought they were coated with Massa's DNA.
07/29/09
"Benvenuti also said Dodge truck engineers followed new testing protocols established by the Society of Automotive Engineers and a group of truck manufacturers to standardize tow testing....."
And
"Dodge isn’t the first manufacturer to magically increase the tow rating of its half-ton pickup without changing hardware. Ford pulled a similar move when it upped the 2008 Ford F-150's max tow rating to 11,000 pounds from 9,900 pounds the year before, after the 2007 Toyota Tundra arrived with a 10,800-pound tow rating."
Not to defend Dodge, nor that the image with Ray as a pixie is not funny...... it's just not quite as insidious as positioned.
Even changing tires or wheels can change the GCWR and thus tow ratings from year to year.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
@Ray Wert: Do I have to say it???? It's the hair, dude! :-)
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
Over the course of the next year, I had some spare time, so I repeated the experiment I had laid out for the students. Low and behold, I found that my original results were too low! What to do, I thought? Right now, the numbers aren't quite right-I shouldn't list anything less than my best answers, even if what I have down isn't hurting anyone and errors on the side of caution. Plus, all the manuals we printed off already have my original results in them! I decided to just put the more accurate numbers in next year's edition.
Then some snarky, nitpicking blog noticed my changes and made some insulting photoshops. Thank goodness I corrected my previous work.
07/29/09
Yup, sounds about right.
07/29/09
People can make all the Nanny State jokes they want, but the litigators own this country. Six of one, half dozen of another.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/30/09
Otherwise, well played!
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
They will never go bankrupt now.
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/30/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09
07/29/09