@Parramore: Well, looking at 2-ish litre rear wheel sport coupes, the nearest comparable car I could find was the 370Z, which is more than 10k more and has a 3.7L V6 which I wasn't in the market for in the first place.
I'd have liked a 240SX, or something with a bit more power, but they're 11 years out of production. I'd have had fun with an MR-2, but they're canned too. I'd have loved a Lotus Exige, but they're fantastically far out of my price range, and I don't think they can be had for any price around where I live... Actually, the more I think about it, the more it seems that apart from the Genesis Coupe, the type of car I was looking for is extinct at almost any cost.
@fuchikoma: If you're looking particularly at the 4 cyl I guess you're right. The 370Z was what I had in mind, assuming you'd bargain with the Nissan saleperson to bring down the price, and assuming a 3.8 Genesis.
@Parramore: Fair enough... there is a lot more like the 3.8L V6. I tend to like 2L I4 cars, especially turbocharged engines; it's just the right balance of performance, economy, and managability for me. (it's a skating rink outside today, so I don't want another 100-200hp...)
They got my business because I wanted something like this, had pretty much given up finding it, and just before settling for something else, I heard about these and gave one a try. They actually had to order one for me to buy because they wouldn't stay on the lot for more than a week, so it seems there was an unsatisfied market for this type of car already...
I'd revise the headline: Hyundai Feasts In November, Sales Up 46%; Proves Either There Is No God or The Typical American's Idea of An Exciting Evening is Sitting At Home Watching Syndicated American Idol Re-Runs While Eating Plain Cottage Cheese
@bmoreDLJ: Whoa whoa whoa. I was sitting at home watching syndicated American Idol reruns just this weekend. I have 4 RWD American cars, three with V8s. So, I don't see how those are related.
For years I have been murdering the pronunciation of Hyundai. Hey, crappy education and not giving a damn is to blame.
Last night I finally got it right, I have got the flue something fierce and as I was throwing up I realized every time I did it sounded like "Hyundai!" Why is that important?
Because after reading this story I just Hyundaied in my mouth a little bit.
Hyundai's benefitting from an improved perception of quality, new products, and the Assurance program, but I would bet that the single most significant factor in its recent success, especially relative to competitors, is the McDonald's effect. In tough economic times, consumers take one step down on price (e.g. replacing Chili's with McDonald's).
@Ash78, tryptophanatic: My guess is that a significant part of the boost is temporary and arguably unrelated to product quality. That's not to say that I think Hyundai sucks or hasn't earned some of its recent success honestly. If it keeps bringing us quality cars at the right price, I think its future looks a lot more like Honda than like, well, Hyundai. All my humble, uneducated, not-entirely-sober opinion, mind you.
@snapoversteer 'bout to get told: I've heard it referred to as the Peanut Butter Effect, it's a pop-economics term for products whose sales tend to increase when economic activity slumps.
@snapoversteer 'bout to get told: I believe the 'temporariness" of the boost will be determined by how satisfied all these new customers end up being with their new cars. It's a game of retension now.
One more facelift and they'll finally be able to stretch the lights right up the A-pillar. And I can't quite tell if the center stack is a Transformer or a Bionicle. So confusing. But if handles well and goes like scoot, I will sit down and shut up. Oh yeah: hatchback with a manual turbo in gray, thanks.
I do not like the proportions of the sedan at all. It's clearly an aftermarket for the USDM. Why can't we have the 3 door? Oh wait, marketing departments and focus groups said we won't buy them.
I believe Ford added the grill in order to turn those that would finally be happy that the Fiesta is coming right back into forum arsonists. Flames make the Internet world go round, thanks Ford!
@Pessimippopotamus: The US has different crash regulations from the Euro ones. Ergo, the nose is longer for more energy absorbance. You should blame NHTSA for screwing up the front end.
@philibuster: I disagree. Longer nose is one thing. Adding a pointlessly garish chrome bits and reducing the lower opening has nothing to do with crash regulations. Or redesigning headlight designs for that matter.
As long as it drives well, is put together well, and is reliable, then looks can be forgiven in a small car. Not for nothing has the butt-ugly Fit been so successful.
@pauljones: Do you think it will be as well made and reliable as a Fit? It is probably about as likely as its chance of being as fast in a straight line as an F430 Challenge Stradale. Then you can worry about pricing. Will they charge more for it than for a Focus, admitting that the Focus is a second rate joke played on the customer? If they don't charge significantly more, how much will they lose on each sale?
Considering that they've changed the styling, the suspension settings, the body configuration, and are holding back the most competitive engines available in the European market, I don't see why this will be any different for driving enthusiasts than was the release of the Escort 'World Car' back in 1980. It could well be different for Ford though, because I don't think this car will register on the sales charts like that previous coal cart did.
@CJinSD: Yes, as a matter of fact, I do think that it will be as well-made and reliable as the Fit, particularly if Ford's latest round of cars is any predictor.
You are sitting here talking out of your ass and throwing down the blanket statement that because it is a Ford or other domestic car, it must necessarily suck.
That may be true of Chryslers, but it sure as hell isn't true of Ford or GM's latest offerings. I don't know what rock you've been hiding under, but the Fusion, Taurus, F-150, Explorer, Escape, Expedition, and Mustang, all from Ford, and all currently for sale, are all great cars.
They are very well made, use high-quality materials including soft-touch plastics, and have had no more reliability issues than their import competitors. In fact, we've been seeing their import competitors, particularly Toyota, having significantly worse issues.
Hell, even the current Focus is a well-made little car with a decent interior. They sure as hell aren't lookers on the outside, and may not be as dynamically capable as a Civic due to the comparatively ancient platform they are built on, but they aren't bad little cars.
As for the rest, we just don't know yet. We don't know what the price is, as it isn't yet for sale. We don't know what the production costs are, but my guess is that if they are going to sell it, they won't lose money on each one made. We don't know what, if any, material changes have been made under the skin or in the interior, as we haven't actually seen or driven the real thing yet.
Also of note, the Fiesta is intended to slot below the Focus, and an all-new Focus is slated to be introduced in a year,
It's one thing to be skeptical of the notion of a good American small car, in fact, it's quite understandable; but rather than applying an obviously false blanket statement to every American car, the least we can do is be rational enough to withhold judgment until it's had the opportunity to be put through it's paces.
@pauljones: I'm not the one that 'made up' the theory that US brands can't make money on small cars. If you'd followed the industry for more than 3 decades like I have, you'd know that every US small car program tends to start with the 'this time it could be different' mantra. This program sounds like a composite of what has come before. The Fiesta program has every element in place to repeat every other time Ford brought over a European car and eliminated all of its native character in the process.
Under the skin it is a Mazda2, so maybe it will be reliable in the manner of a Mazda6 based Fusion. I still don't see Fusions commanding the same transaction prices as Accords do, and it isn't a mystery why to anyone who has cross shopped them.
@pauljones: I couldn't agree more. I'm actually very proud of Ford. They are making some really great products as of late. GM is getting better, starting with the Malibu, as Ford did with the Fusion those years back.
As for Chrysler... I don't know about them. They are going to have a rough rough rough time ahead of them.
@CJinSD: Sorry, but I simply haven't been around three decades as of yet (thankfully).
In the roughly two-and-a-half decades that I have been around, however, I have learned to recognize my personal biases and how they might erode away at objectivity, and how to compensate for them.
You are correct from the standpoint that past attempts at domestic small cars have had similar claims, and that most were reviewed as being crap.
But here's the nuance you are choosing to ignore: the Cruze, the Fiesta, and the upcoming Focus, which are all for sale in Europe, have received positive reviews thus far. Combined with the context of their other recent offerings receiving positive reviews, there is reason to believe that the new Fiesta will also be good.
As for past attempts at domestic small car, many have sucked. Believe me, I drive on of them. I'm not immune to that truth. But many have been better at the time and in retrospect than you choose to realize. Case in point? The Focus. When first released, it was the best car in it's class. It fell behind because it went so long without a replacement, but it remains a competent little car.
Finally, your assertion that the Fusion may not command the same resale value as an equivalent Accord in equivalent condition may be true, but once again, you are choosing to gloss over a great deal of context there. Like Toyotas, Hondas have been raised to near mythical status without any real reason to back it up. 80's Japanese cars are just as crappy now as the 80's domestic cars.
It's all people's perception. If door handle breaks on a Civic or Corolla, or even a Jetta, the response is "Oh, no big deal. I'll just get it fixed." If the same thing happens on a Focus or a Cobalt, the reaction is "Stupid American POS!" This is somewhat understandable, as domestic automakers have in the past put out some crappy offerings. But that doesn't mean that that is still true today.
Granted, neither Ford nor GM will fix the reputation that they were pegged with overnight, but a few years from now, the resale values will equalize, as even the old Fusion was as capable a car as its Honda and Toyota contemporaries. When that is realized over the lifetime of the cars, the disparity will begin to disappear. No, it won't happen overnight. But to apply the same blanket statement that is obviously false because you personally choose to ignore factors that are contradictory to your previously held notions is just ignorant.
@CJinSD: You're absolutely right. Honda's vehicle pricing is like getting plugged from behind. Twice. So it's no surprise that their transaction prices are higher, but as a large number of satisfied buyers will tell you, the Fusion is a MUCH BETTER value than the Accord.
And for your enlightenment, the Fusion isn't all that close to the Mazda6 anyway; they were developed simultaneously as two mostly-unique models.
@pauljones: By transaction prices for Accords and Fusions, I meant what they command brand new. Not retail prices, which are often 3 grand higher than people pay for domestic cars and a bit lower than people pay for Japanese cars when you factor in various dealer add-ons like accessories and document fees, but actual prices paid for actual cars.
Imagine a new 2009 Malibu overstaying its welcome at a dealer in Southern California, where a domestic sedan is as cherished as herpes. The retail price may be $27K, but with incentives and dealer desperation you can buy it for $21,500. Accross the street, the dealer has the first 2010 Accord EX-L 4-cylinder/automatic. If you want it, the dealer will take the $27K sticker plus $450 for mandatory window etching, $99 for wheel locks you don't care about, and $300 for forgetting to process your DMV paperwork.
$21,500 for the Chevy and $27,849 would be the transaction prices, and they are the difference between Honda and the Honda dealer making money on a particular car and GM and the Chevy dealer not making money on another.
People cross shopping Fusions and Accords become aware that the Fusion carries a big price advantage in the real world. Most of them still buy the Accords because they are tactilely better in addition to any advantage in reputation.
Are you suggesting that there is little to choose between 20+ year old Domestic and Japanese cars? I'm not sure how you determined that, but it was anything but the case at the time. New Japanese cars in the '80s had straight body seams, interiors that fit together, wheel trims that didn't fall off in the first month of ownership, and a level of reliability that US cars only now supposedly match. Very few Japanese cars had decent styling or much to offer enthusiasts, but they were of much, much higher quality than the offerings of the big 3 at the time. I should know, as I was still one of their victims at the time.
@CJinSD: Yes, but how are 20 year old models relevant to today? I am as much of an Asian car snob as anyone else ( My current Nissan has 334k on it, and it is one owner, one engine), but I frankly do not see much value in choosing a Honda over a Ford today. Hondas have a reputation for reliability, but that reputation does not pan out when the VERY regular and expensive maintenance is ignored. Civics are notorious for blown head gaskets, and difficult to replace water pumps. A similar year Sentra does not have the same issue with it's timing chain engine versus Honda's use of a belt. Yet the Civic is better regarded by the great unwashed in terms of quality than the Nissan. Times do change, and Ford is easily the equal of Toyota today, and maybe even Honda in terms of quality. It will take a while for perceptions to change, but given time and enough decent models it will.
As for GM, I hope they turn it around, but I am not ready to give them a chance. I will however, cross shop the Fiesta versus the other cars in it's field :The Fit, Versa, and Polo (if available). I have already eliminated the Yaris and anything GM, Chrysler, Hyundai or Kia from my list, and the Civic, Corolla, and Golf are too big and too pricey for me to even look at.
@Jim-Bob: My experience, which includes being a service writer in an all makes shop as recently as December 2006, differs greatly. The biggest problem we saw in more than one Honda Civic was a snapped off hood release lever. They have a crummy design, which I believe they have yet to improve upon. They all now come with timing chains instead of belts though. When they had belts, I don't recall them failing inside of prescribed maintenance intervals. Hondas and Toyotas were the only cars I would consider buying after my time at the shop.
I flinched every time a Nissan pulled into the lot, and it happened all the time. Now that I have a Honda, I've spent less than $200 on maintaining it by the book over almost 3 years.
Having left the miserable world of trying to fix Nissans, I have a girlfriend with one. It needs a catalytic converter after 90K miles, the one that is part of the exhaust manifold. The dealer is happy that this one made it 10K miles past the warranty, as they all fail. They don't care that they sold the car new and maintained it. This being California, the replacement has to be the dealer part. From the dealer. Period. Figure about $1,500 for this repair, and on a car whose paint fell off after less than 5 years, just like every other dark grey Nissan in southern California. Did I mention that the heater core has started to give off coolant smells this week?
Basically, the car has totaled itself by being a crummy piece of crap after 7 years and 90K miles of light use in the hands of a nice school teacher. I'm glad yours has treated you well, but I have had to deliver the bad news to at least a 100 people who were not well served by Nissan. One of them was a Nissan rep practically stranded by a new Quest, which brought me so much joy I'm probably paying for it still by being in a position to pay for my girlfriend's mistake of buying one of these awful cars.
@CJinSD: I have had several good Nissans though, one of them being a 1995 Sentra. It had the Ga16DE engine and was seemingly indestructible. I put 100k miles on it in the two years I had it ( I got it at 60k) and it never missed a beat. In that time, I used it as a pizza delivery beater, regularly skipped maintenance, jumped it, practiced hand brake turns in it ( I let all my friends treat it like they stole it too), and did my damnedest to drive it sideways with the handbrake on any dirt road I could find. My biggest complaint was that it liked to warp rotors when I drove it hard and hit puddles ( I like to threshold brake my cars at every stop...lol). I had an upgrade package ready for it when I found some wheels, but before I could do it it died in an intersection from impacting a RAV 4 while panic braking from 55 mph. In my business, Civics rarely outlast old Sentras. They seem to die quickly when the timing belt is neglected and most are lucky to see 200k miles. I expect more from a car than dying after it has just been broken in. I expect to see 500k miles on one engine with nothing more than gaskets replaced. I hit the fuel cut 5 times a day in my Frontier and it never skips a beat, so I expect that from every car I buy. I also run it low on oil, and skip oil changes some times with several going past 15k miles between them.
Ford has two jet engines, and the Russkie only one. Pretty easy choice. Besides, the Ford gets you a bubble canopy, wings, and racing stripes.
Of course the Soviet model probably behaves better in collisions with military vehicles, never wears out, and can always be made to start in the winter by lighting a fire on top of the engine. This might be harder than I thought.
03:56 PM
I got a Gencoupe and I love it - it's exactly what I was looking for, and there was literally no competition within $10,000 of it.
04:25 PM
04:56 PM
I'd have liked a 240SX, or something with a bit more power, but they're 11 years out of production. I'd have had fun with an MR-2, but they're canned too. I'd have loved a Lotus Exige, but they're fantastically far out of my price range, and I don't think they can be had for any price around where I live... Actually, the more I think about it, the more it seems that apart from the Genesis Coupe, the type of car I was looking for is extinct at almost any cost.
05:14 PM
06:07 PM
They got my business because I wanted something like this, had pretty much given up finding it, and just before settling for something else, I heard about these and gave one a try. They actually had to order one for me to buy because they wouldn't stay on the lot for more than a week, so it seems there was an unsatisfied market for this type of car already...
03:32 PM
04:39 PM
05:16 PM
02:57 PM
Last night I finally got it right, I have got the flue something fierce and as I was throwing up I realized every time I did it sounded like "Hyundai!" Why is that important?
Because after reading this story I just Hyundaied in my mouth a little bit.
04:03 PM
02:46 PM
02:58 PM
I'm wondering the same...is Hyundai truly the "next Honda" or is it just based on temporary frugailty?
03:02 PM
03:28 PM
03:36 PM
03:47 PM
05:10 PM
02:40 PM
03:13 PM
11:31 AM
Dull as it was, I preferred the "Meet Dave" days to this overly-busy, scattershot crap.
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
I'm sick of these localizations.
It looks like it has teeth grill on it and the taillamps look like crap.
11/30/09
It's the U.S. sedan that gets the three bar grille...sadly.
11/30/09
But don't mind me. I always get riled up about the smallest things.
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
Considering that they've changed the styling, the suspension settings, the body configuration, and are holding back the most competitive engines available in the European market, I don't see why this will be any different for driving enthusiasts than was the release of the Escort 'World Car' back in 1980. It could well be different for Ford though, because I don't think this car will register on the sales charts like that previous coal cart did.
11/30/09
11/30/09
You are sitting here talking out of your ass and throwing down the blanket statement that because it is a Ford or other domestic car, it must necessarily suck.
That may be true of Chryslers, but it sure as hell isn't true of Ford or GM's latest offerings. I don't know what rock you've been hiding under, but the Fusion, Taurus, F-150, Explorer, Escape, Expedition, and Mustang, all from Ford, and all currently for sale, are all great cars.
They are very well made, use high-quality materials including soft-touch plastics, and have had no more reliability issues than their import competitors. In fact, we've been seeing their import competitors, particularly Toyota, having significantly worse issues.
Hell, even the current Focus is a well-made little car with a decent interior. They sure as hell aren't lookers on the outside, and may not be as dynamically capable as a Civic due to the comparatively ancient platform they are built on, but they aren't bad little cars.
As for the rest, we just don't know yet. We don't know what the price is, as it isn't yet for sale. We don't know what the production costs are, but my guess is that if they are going to sell it, they won't lose money on each one made. We don't know what, if any, material changes have been made under the skin or in the interior, as we haven't actually seen or driven the real thing yet.
Also of note, the Fiesta is intended to slot below the Focus, and an all-new Focus is slated to be introduced in a year,
It's one thing to be skeptical of the notion of a good American small car, in fact, it's quite understandable; but rather than applying an obviously false blanket statement to every American car, the least we can do is be rational enough to withhold judgment until it's had the opportunity to be put through it's paces.
11/30/09
Under the skin it is a Mazda2, so maybe it will be reliable in the manner of a Mazda6 based Fusion. I still don't see Fusions commanding the same transaction prices as Accords do, and it isn't a mystery why to anyone who has cross shopped them.
11/30/09
11/30/09
As for Chrysler... I don't know about them. They are going to have a rough rough rough time ahead of them.
11/30/09
In the roughly two-and-a-half decades that I have been around, however, I have learned to recognize my personal biases and how they might erode away at objectivity, and how to compensate for them.
You are correct from the standpoint that past attempts at domestic small cars have had similar claims, and that most were reviewed as being crap.
But here's the nuance you are choosing to ignore: the Cruze, the Fiesta, and the upcoming Focus, which are all for sale in Europe, have received positive reviews thus far. Combined with the context of their other recent offerings receiving positive reviews, there is reason to believe that the new Fiesta will also be good.
As for past attempts at domestic small car, many have sucked. Believe me, I drive on of them. I'm not immune to that truth. But many have been better at the time and in retrospect than you choose to realize. Case in point? The Focus. When first released, it was the best car in it's class. It fell behind because it went so long without a replacement, but it remains a competent little car.
Finally, your assertion that the Fusion may not command the same resale value as an equivalent Accord in equivalent condition may be true, but once again, you are choosing to gloss over a great deal of context there. Like Toyotas, Hondas have been raised to near mythical status without any real reason to back it up. 80's Japanese cars are just as crappy now as the 80's domestic cars.
It's all people's perception. If door handle breaks on a Civic or Corolla, or even a Jetta, the response is "Oh, no big deal. I'll just get it fixed." If the same thing happens on a Focus or a Cobalt, the reaction is "Stupid American POS!" This is somewhat understandable, as domestic automakers have in the past put out some crappy offerings. But that doesn't mean that that is still true today.
Granted, neither Ford nor GM will fix the reputation that they were pegged with overnight, but a few years from now, the resale values will equalize, as even the old Fusion was as capable a car as its Honda and Toyota contemporaries. When that is realized over the lifetime of the cars, the disparity will begin to disappear. No, it won't happen overnight. But to apply the same blanket statement that is obviously false because you personally choose to ignore factors that are contradictory to your previously held notions is just ignorant.
11/30/09
And for your enlightenment, the Fusion isn't all that close to the Mazda6 anyway; they were developed simultaneously as two mostly-unique models.
11/30/09
Imagine a new 2009 Malibu overstaying its welcome at a dealer in Southern California, where a domestic sedan is as cherished as herpes. The retail price may be $27K, but with incentives and dealer desperation you can buy it for $21,500. Accross the street, the dealer has the first 2010 Accord EX-L 4-cylinder/automatic. If you want it, the dealer will take the $27K sticker plus $450 for mandatory window etching, $99 for wheel locks you don't care about, and $300 for forgetting to process your DMV paperwork.
$21,500 for the Chevy and $27,849 would be the transaction prices, and they are the difference between Honda and the Honda dealer making money on a particular car and GM and the Chevy dealer not making money on another.
People cross shopping Fusions and Accords become aware that the Fusion carries a big price advantage in the real world. Most of them still buy the Accords because they are tactilely better in addition to any advantage in reputation.
Are you suggesting that there is little to choose between 20+ year old Domestic and Japanese cars? I'm not sure how you determined that, but it was anything but the case at the time. New Japanese cars in the '80s had straight body seams, interiors that fit together, wheel trims that didn't fall off in the first month of ownership, and a level of reliability that US cars only now supposedly match. Very few Japanese cars had decent styling or much to offer enthusiasts, but they were of much, much higher quality than the offerings of the big 3 at the time. I should know, as I was still one of their victims at the time.
11/30/09
As for GM, I hope they turn it around, but I am not ready to give them a chance. I will however, cross shop the Fiesta versus the other cars in it's field :The Fit, Versa, and Polo (if available). I have already eliminated the Yaris and anything GM, Chrysler, Hyundai or Kia from my list, and the Civic, Corolla, and Golf are too big and too pricey for me to even look at.
11/30/09
I flinched every time a Nissan pulled into the lot, and it happened all the time. Now that I have a Honda, I've spent less than $200 on maintaining it by the book over almost 3 years.
Having left the miserable world of trying to fix Nissans, I have a girlfriend with one. It needs a catalytic converter after 90K miles, the one that is part of the exhaust manifold. The dealer is happy that this one made it 10K miles past the warranty, as they all fail. They don't care that they sold the car new and maintained it. This being California, the replacement has to be the dealer part. From the dealer. Period. Figure about $1,500 for this repair, and on a car whose paint fell off after less than 5 years, just like every other dark grey Nissan in southern California. Did I mention that the heater core has started to give off coolant smells this week?
Basically, the car has totaled itself by being a crummy piece of crap after 7 years and 90K miles of light use in the hands of a nice school teacher. I'm glad yours has treated you well, but I have had to deliver the bad news to at least a 100 people who were not well served by Nissan. One of them was a Nissan rep practically stranded by a new Quest, which brought me so much joy I'm probably paying for it still by being in a position to pay for my girlfriend's mistake of buying one of these awful cars.
12:03 AM
11/30/09
Of course the Soviet model probably behaves better in collisions with military vehicles, never wears out, and can always be made to start in the winter by lighting a fire on top of the engine. This might be harder than I thought.