I had written a long comment but it got deleted before I could post but Basically...the AP is sensationalizing the govt numbers. They use the term "swap" to say more swaps were for the F-150 than anything else, meaning straight up, model for model. Well duh. Per the program rules you couldn't trade a Camry for a Camry!
The fact is avg MPG went up 9.2 mpg per transaction.
8200 F-150 "swaps" vs 700,000+ transactions.
100,000 more cars bought than trucks (which included light CUVs like Escape).
The AP should print a retraction and apologize for sensationalizing something that was mentioned from the earliest reporting of the program. #cashforclunkers
@Rabbi Dave: Indeed, the story can't see the forest for a handful of truck swaps. Towards the end: The data show the average fuel economy was 15.8 mpg for the old vehicles and 24.9 for the new ones. Overall, the program worked extremely well as a stimulus measure and environmental benefit; anyone who think the economy didn't need stimulus is pretty divorced from reality.
And people's fake concern about the pollution from all that manufacturing is unwarranted. 11 tons CO2 to manufacture a car vs. avoiding 19 lbs CO2 for every gallon not burned saves tons of CO2 overall. To increase the fuel economy of the US fleet you have to swap old cars for new, unless you're proposing engine swaps, EV conversions, and adding lightness. #cashforclunkers
@skierpage: How exactly does one add lightness... helium or hydrogen in the tires?
Just because the average fuel economy went up doesn't mean that it's all good. I'm not just talking about saving the penguins and tree hugging. I'm talking about my money that went to other people and I got zero benefit because I own a car that wasn't "clunkery" enough.
We have no idea how these cars will be used. Daily drivers, secondary cars, bought it just to have? People could drag whatever they wanted in irregardless of whether they drove it. They could be driving a 30+MPG appliance (Corolla) daily, but traded in an old Cadillic Fleetwood that used to be their grandpa's for another 30+MPG appliance. The government just threw our money out the window.
In my father-in-law's case there is a net loss in CO2 emissions. He traded in a full size pickup that hadn't run in 2 years and was barely worth scrap metal cost. Now that he has a new shiny pickup, he drives it constantly and stopped driving his car, which gets 50% better MPG.
@torreys71004: None of what you say refutes what I said. This was a stimulus program that increased the fuel efficiency of the US auto fleet. Give us your better proposal. A gas tax would get people driving less (I support one phased in over a long period), but is probably not a good idea in an economic downturn. #cashforclunkers
Building a new, mid-sized car apparently uses up 6.9 tonnes of CO2 (Ford numbers) or up to 14 tonnes (Toyota's numbers). If one assumes the average 10.5 tonnes (presumably also averaging SUVs and compacts) we could expect some savings in about four years time. For now, the environment is decidedly worse off, but the median age of US cars is 8.9 years. The total remaining savings would be 9.5 million tons of CO2, equivalent to 12 hours and 45 minutes of total US CO2 emissions.
So that, and an unnatural blip in car sales, is what your $3 billion bought you. #cashforclunkers
If I had the energy, I would dig up all of my old posts filled with doubt and despair and say "told you so".
The article says that 1.87 million tons of CO2 will be saved yearly (sounds more impressive than it is). Could someone find out approximately how much CO2 is released by building the 677,081 new vehicles involved? Then we'll find out if any possible reduction was worth $3 billion, or if they could have been better spent elsewhere. #cashforclunkers
In response to the fact that Cash for Clunkers wasn't as good for the Earth as was originally thought, I will cut my hair, wear black all through the rest of the year, and change my cell ringtone to a funeral dirge in order to mourn the passing of the Maseratis, the TVR 280i, the Buick GNX, the Bentley Continental R, the Astons, the Taurus SHOs, the LaForzas, the rest of the enthusiast-type cars, and even the Zimmers and Excaliburs, ugly things that they are. Yes, really. I will. #cashforclunkers
Sounds like fraud, or misidentification. Even a burnt- out shell of a TVR should be worth more than $4500. A friend of mine was a garbage man in the early 80's, when the steel mills here in Pittsburgh were shutting down. He had several guys give him $50 to throw their nearly new Harleys into the crusher, so they could report them stolen and get out of the payments.
So either a lot of fraud happened during cash 4 clunkers or a lot of people can't type and entered information wrong.
I refuse to believe that someone would happily trade in their 97 Continental R or 06 A4 Cabriolet for a max of $4500, i truly don't think anyone with those cars is that stupid.
So either someone took there severly mashed up Bentley (Which if it was worth less than $4500 probably wasn't drivable and therefore not eligible) and somehow got the dealership to agree to a trade or someone has entered something wrong on a computer and meant to type 2wd Explorer and failed miserably.
You would hope that someone somewhere looked at this list and went eh??? and will investigate what happened but i doubt it.........
I mean to say I lack faith in the intelligence of humanity is like saying the Pacific Ocean is damp, but even I'm doubtful anyone could be that monumentally stupid.
If we believe the soul is too beautiful to perish, then we must remember that the lost live on. If moving on to a greater knowledge, they have had their freedom and perspective increased, and can find a place where the roads have been left to wind, and the trees left to overhang.
/I wish it was cold, I wish I could see the stars.
Alright, I call BS here, at least at some level. Car dealerships are businesses and as such would never sell a car for a tenth of its value. Even if they only gave the idiot non-human owner $4500 for it, they could have easily turned around and sold the car for whatever price they want. It's easier than ever to determine a ballpark value for a car. A monkey can read the back of the car and then check kbb.com. Hell, a dealership in Philly decided to take a loss with a late 80's Caprice because it had only 37,000 miles and was in perfect condition.
So what is happening with this list then? Fraud? Maybe, even probably. Just a cursory look at the list reveals that supposedly 2 2002 BMW (E39) 525i's were traded in under the program. It doesn't even qualify!!!!! Either that's the product of fraud, or the list is just dead wrong. Maybe it's denial, but I'm not going to buy that a GNX was put to death under C4C. The LaForza, Typhoon, 850i, and Excalibur are believable in high-mileage thrashed condition. Still very sad, though.
I hereby mourn these and all other Jalop-worthy cars put to death under C4C. This included a total in the hundreds of mid-90's B-bodies, BMW M's, Audi S series cars, Camaros, Vettes, Foxes, etc etc.
@gman1023: If the dealership submitted the car to the Gov't as a C4C vehicle, when they had no choice (legally, anyway) but to process the car as per the guidelines... there's no rule, however, that stated that if a customer offered a trade-in that they HAD to accept it under C4C... a smart dealer could always have said: "Tellya, what, pal - I'll give you $500 extra for that Aston Martin if we do it as a straight trade/no clunkers.", and they would have been idiots not to do so.
But, then again, there are idiots in the world, as is evidenced by this entire thread/article, assuming it's all true.
@HoonThatFerrari: Exactly. Or, they could even pay the owner just $4500 and just "forget" to submit all of the necessary paperwork.
And yes, heartless idiots, I might add. The thought of a clunkerized Typhoon sickens me. Even if it does burn more oil than gasoline and has 200,000 miles.
@Maymar: No argument from me. Excaliburs are some of the gaudiest pieces of garbage. And as often as not, it seems that the value is in line for C4C anyway. No loss there.
You missed the 1989 Pontiac Turbo Trans Am which was also clunkered according to the list linked by others.
I blame the owners less (who knows maybe these were cars that were dumped on them by deceased loved ones, or some other weird situation) but the dealers more. I mean think about it when they take a trade in that they cant sell (anything older than like 6 or 7 years old most dealers don't put on the lot) they send it to auction. If the dealer had half a brain they would say "sure we will give you $4500" and instead of CFCing the car they would send it out to auction where any of these rides would bring twice that minimum.
11/05/09
The fact is avg MPG went up 9.2 mpg per transaction.
8200 F-150 "swaps" vs 700,000+ transactions.
100,000 more cars bought than trucks (which included light CUVs like Escape).
The AP should print a retraction and apologize for sensationalizing something that was mentioned from the earliest reporting of the program. #cashforclunkers
11/05/09
And people's fake concern about the pollution from all that manufacturing is unwarranted. 11 tons CO2 to manufacture a car vs. avoiding 19 lbs CO2 for every gallon not burned saves tons of CO2 overall. To increase the fuel economy of the US fleet you have to swap old cars for new, unless you're proposing engine swaps, EV conversions, and adding lightness. #cashforclunkers
11/06/09
Just because the average fuel economy went up doesn't mean that it's all good. I'm not just talking about saving the penguins and tree hugging. I'm talking about my money that went to other people and I got zero benefit because I own a car that wasn't "clunkery" enough.
We have no idea how these cars will be used. Daily drivers, secondary cars, bought it just to have? People could drag whatever they wanted in irregardless of whether they drove it. They could be driving a 30+MPG appliance (Corolla) daily, but traded in an old Cadillic Fleetwood that used to be their grandpa's for another 30+MPG appliance. The government just threw our money out the window.
In my father-in-law's case there is a net loss in CO2 emissions. He traded in a full size pickup that hadn't run in 2 years and was barely worth scrap metal cost. Now that he has a new shiny pickup, he drives it constantly and stopped driving his car, which gets 50% better MPG.
11/06/09
11/05/09
Largesse! Praise be to the Emperor for our slightly more fuel efficient vehicles! #cashforclunkers
11/05/09
So that, and an unnatural blip in car sales, is what your $3 billion bought you. #cashforclunkers
11/05/09
11/05/09
The Elantra is perfect for NYC. Don't care about the car, don't care about the dings. Still don't want. #cashforclunkers
11/05/09
The article says that 1.87 million tons of CO2 will be saved yearly (sounds more impressive than it is). Could someone find out approximately how much CO2 is released by building the 677,081 new vehicles involved? Then we'll find out if any possible reduction was worth $3 billion, or if they could have been better spent elsewhere. #cashforclunkers
11/05/09
11/05/09
Actually, I did. There's always some ruse to take my money and throw it at someone else. #cashforclunkers
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
And Godspeed, John R. Cash.
11/05/09
09/25/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
I refuse to believe that someone would happily trade in their 97 Continental R or 06 A4 Cabriolet for a max of $4500, i truly don't think anyone with those cars is that stupid.
So either someone took there severly mashed up Bentley (Which if it was worth less than $4500 probably wasn't drivable and therefore not eligible) and somehow got the dealership to agree to a trade or someone has entered something wrong on a computer and meant to type 2wd Explorer and failed miserably.
You would hope that someone somewhere looked at this list and went eh??? and will investigate what happened but i doubt it.........
09/23/09
I mean to say I lack faith in the intelligence of humanity is like saying the Pacific Ocean is damp, but even I'm doubtful anyone could be that monumentally stupid.
09/23/09
/I wish it was cold, I wish I could see the stars.
09/23/09
So what is happening with this list then? Fraud? Maybe, even probably. Just a cursory look at the list reveals that supposedly 2 2002 BMW (E39) 525i's were traded in under the program. It doesn't even qualify!!!!! Either that's the product of fraud, or the list is just dead wrong. Maybe it's denial, but I'm not going to buy that a GNX was put to death under C4C. The LaForza, Typhoon, 850i, and Excalibur are believable in high-mileage thrashed condition. Still very sad, though.
I hereby mourn these and all other Jalop-worthy cars put to death under C4C. This included a total in the hundreds of mid-90's B-bodies, BMW M's, Audi S series cars, Camaros, Vettes, Foxes, etc etc.
09/23/09
But, then again, there are idiots in the world, as is evidenced by this entire thread/article, assuming it's all true.
09/23/09
09/23/09
And yes, heartless idiots, I might add. The thought of a clunkerized Typhoon sickens me. Even if it does burn more oil than gasoline and has 200,000 miles.
09/23/09
09/23/09
I blame the owners less (who knows maybe these were cars that were dumped on them by deceased loved ones, or some other weird situation) but the dealers more. I mean think about it when they take a trade in that they cant sell (anything older than like 6 or 7 years old most dealers don't put on the lot) they send it to auction. If the dealer had half a brain they would say "sure we will give you $4500" and instead of CFCing the car they would send it out to auction where any of these rides would bring twice that minimum.
I can't even fathom the stupidity!