Sure, a separate boat and car would be cheaper, but this guy will get the laugh last when he drives straight into the lake and you have to take the time to drop in and unhook and end up getting eaten by the zombies.
Sorry, but that looks like a lot of fun.
I hope they make a few of these and they have the combined depreciation of a car and a boat. Then I can pick one up in 5 years or so.
An amphibian with a 60mph top speed in the water would allow me to get from St. Catharines to Toronto in a reasonable amount of time (~1hr) without touching the QEW/Gardiner.
Working there instead of working in Niagara would add between 30 and 50k to my salary. If that thing comes with a heater powerful enough to repel 40-below-in-the-middle-of-a-lake, it basically justifies itself financially.
Kills the economics, as both cars and the boat would have to be separately insured and maintained. Plus, I would need to park in Toronto, and pay the city's exorbitant car-ownership tax. Finally, no available parking near the lake shore, so I would need to pay for a cab to get to my toronto-stored car.
Considering the going rate for a seaworthy Amphicar is in the $40k-$60k range these days, maybe $200k isn't too out of line for a [more than 4 times] faster carboat.
I'd still rather have the Amphicar, with it's tire rudder steering, and 7 knots top end when seafaring, because at least the Amphicar is cute.
@dolo54 blows minds and blows engines!: Come to think of it, that is a damn good point. Why can't we have seating like that in a nice big convertible... Like, say, an old Lincoln Continental.
Someone find Ben, we've gotta pitch an idea to him.
10/07/09
10/07/09
This cynical barsted wants one
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Not sure if it's amphibious, but it looks a million times better.
10/07/09
.
10/07/09
Also, here is the real Corvette speedboat.
10/07/09
That is awesome. But I still prefer an Amphicar.
10/07/09
@Buickboy92: Seconded.
I'm also decidedly partial to the Schwimmwagen.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
I hope they make a few of these and they have the combined depreciation of a car and a boat. Then I can pick one up in 5 years or so.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
My buddy Hoops had a boat like that once
10/07/09
10/07/09
Working there instead of working in Niagara would add between 30 and 50k to my salary. If that thing comes with a heater powerful enough to repel 40-below-in-the-middle-of-a-lake, it basically justifies itself financially.
Added bonus: Shorter trips to Cedar Point.
10/07/09
10/07/09
Kills the economics, as both cars and the boat would have to be separately insured and maintained. Plus, I would need to park in Toronto, and pay the city's exorbitant car-ownership tax. Finally, no available parking near the lake shore, so I would need to pay for a cab to get to my toronto-stored car.
10/07/09
10/07/09
However, not driving on the QEW between Niagara and Toronto would be pretty nice.
10/07/09
I'd still rather have the Amphicar, with it's tire rudder steering, and 7 knots top end when seafaring, because at least the Amphicar is cute.
This thing, not so much.
10/07/09
10/07/09
@SirNotAppearing: The Wally 118 hits 70mph. It may need three gas turbines generating a total of 16,800HP to do that, but it does. And in style.
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
10/07/09
Someone find Ben, we've gotta pitch an idea to him.