Novaload Wants the Jez 9 Back promoted this comment
Iron coffin doesn't swerve for pelicans was starred
Iron coffin doesn't swerve for pelicans was unstarred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
Extra bearings are just additional, potential failure points. It's not like the power production is ever going to start twisting up the crank. This piece of history is a direct link to the age of steam. And belongs back there.
@Big_Adam: Ah yes, the joys of tuning "a carb named SU"; one friend, after close to a year of continuous fiddling with a pair of them, determined he was essentially swapping between 3 different jetting configurations to match barometric conditions and obtained 2 more sets of screw-in shafts for his use. It was orders of magnitude quicker and easier to change jetting that way than to deal with c-clips and sliders in the field.
@felis_concolor:
After dealing with the SU's on a Datsun roadster( and driving myself stark raving batshit in the process), I was let in on a little tip. The shaft that the butterfly's are on just runs through the carb body - there's no bushing, etc. The hole get's worn, and no amount of effing around with it will help you tune. Pulled the carbs, made seats/ bushings. problem solved...
@Vintage Racer - with V-12 goodness: Augh, I need to let my friend know about that alteration the next time I bump into him. It was his own experiences which kept me happy with my '72 510 sporting the ubiquitous 32/36 Weber atop the manifold. I spent so much time w/Q-jets after making a general shift to big American iron that suspecting a leaking throttle shaft bushing or pivot comes naturally there when tuning issues arise, but I never considered that as a malady for SUs as well.
Nice price, even though it doesn't really make sense to buy a ratty old English car for that much. We're thinking with the heart, not the pocket book here.
Now if it was in crappy shape and cost half as much, I would say turn it into a gasser. But that's what I say about all cars from this era.
It's a perfect little car, what the hell. Nice price.
Too bad our Government Motors Corporation won't take some styling cues from classics and lose the jellybean all-of-a-piece styling for some fenders/wings and shapely hoods/bonnets and trunks/boots.
"We all know that old British cars have not been proven to be the most durable,"
Good sir! I take great umbrage at this comment! It insults all my 1964 Hornet stands for! My car's old, rattly but can crack 100mph and off roads well.
@85_GN: That kid could seriously do with less twinkies and more ACTUAL sunshine. Actual sunshine, of course, generally coming with exercise.
Though, I guess his friends could roll him down the hill... I bet his coefficient of friction isn't that high at all once he starts sweating profusely from moving a greater distance than the fridge is from the couch.
Nice Price. According to the engineerd Fair Market Value (eFMV patent pending), the fair market value for this piece of automotive history is exactly $11,001 USD.
$1000 for being fairly rare on these shores. Hell, an operating one is rare on any shore. $10,000 for being from England. The English have been our closest allies for a very long time. Of course, we had to kick their asses twice before they came around. $1 for being from Canada. Our friends from the north are a jolly lot, for sure. But can you really trust a restoration by someone who is probably stoned and drunk 26 hours of the day? (Convert 24 hour days to Canadian days and you get 26 hour days).
Therefore, this is solidly in Crack Pipe territory.
Didn't Ron Weasley drive a blue one in one of the Harry Potter movies? Regardless, this has Wallace and Gromit written all over it. Where do I go pick it up?
08/17/09
Look what happens when you run it with extra hamsters....
08/16/09
08/16/09
08/16/09
08/16/09
@brianesser76:
Apparently, they just prefer to sit right on top of it... easier to access while pedaling that way.
08/16/09
Let down only by its wiring harness, it was.
08/16/09
Heeeey, I and my 1964 Hornet take offence. 40odd year old and I have yet to have an electrical problem.
Carbs on the other hand. Urgh, damn twin carbs.
Anayway, YAY A-Series engine and all the glory and horror it provides.
08/16/09
08/16/09
After dealing with the SU's on a Datsun roadster( and driving myself stark raving batshit in the process), I was let in on a little tip. The shaft that the butterfly's are on just runs through the carb body - there's no bushing, etc. The hole get's worn, and no amount of effing around with it will help you tune. Pulled the carbs, made seats/ bushings. problem solved...
08/16/09
08/16/09
(Obviously, I'm half-kidding - see Auto Union, Western Union, Union Pacific...)
06/02/09
Now if it was in crappy shape and cost half as much, I would say turn it into a gasser. But that's what I say about all cars from this era.
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
Too bad our Government Motors Corporation won't take some styling cues from classics and lose the jellybean all-of-a-piece styling for some fenders/wings and shapely hoods/bonnets and trunks/boots.
06/02/09
06/02/09
Good sir! I take great umbrage at this comment! It insults all my 1964 Hornet stands for! My car's old, rattly but can crack 100mph and off roads well.
Flippant disregard to solidness of my automacar.
06/02/09
Although it'sdeeply non-standard if it can crack 100mph.
06/02/09
06/02/09
Though, I guess his friends could roll him down the hill... I bet his coefficient of friction isn't that high at all once he starts sweating profusely from moving a greater distance than the fridge is from the couch.
Wankelin'
06/02/09
06/02/09
$1000 for being fairly rare on these shores. Hell, an operating one is rare on any shore. $10,000 for being from England. The English have been our closest allies for a very long time. Of course, we had to kick their asses twice before they came around. $1 for being from Canada. Our friends from the north are a jolly lot, for sure. But can you really trust a restoration by someone who is probably stoned and drunk 26 hours of the day? (Convert 24 hour days to Canadian days and you get 26 hour days).
Therefore, this is solidly in Crack Pipe territory.
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
06/02/09
There are too many pun opportunities and I feel compelled to act on all of them. I feel like Howard Hughes.
I must abstain from any further commenting on this post.
06/02/09