I once watched a TV travel program about Greece that profiled a beach club on Mykonos's Paradise Beach called "Super Paradise." The show's host was standing outside the little fence that roped off the club grounds from the public beach, while the owner was inside the fence. The host asked the man what the club's big draw was, when the whole area was breathtaking, and mostly accessible for free. The club owner said, "You are, indeed, in Paradise, but I"—gesturing to the fenced-in square in which he stood—"I am in SUPER Paradise!"
As a bonus, they're so expensive, initially, the original owner tends to keep them up quite well and amortizes the cost over a longer period, so a 12 year old Benz/BMW/Jag/other high-end ride has seen less neglect/abuse than a 4 year old commoner's car.
However, I still kinda want a 2010 CTS-V in about 2013-2015.
@bmoreDLJ: It doesn't have the 'new' look of Mercedes, for one. However, the real question is: What the hell is wrong with the CL? This can't possibly be any more reminiscent of the CL, just minus looks and exclusivity.
The mid-sized coupe was always badged 'E', and the CLK was more a product of late-'90s marketing than anything else. It was supposed to connote the 'new' Mercedes philosophy of lighter and relatively less-expensive cars.
Unfortunately this ultimately went over like a lead balloon as the new MB products from this era were pretty unanimously considered crap compared to the 'old' Mercedes philosophy of building the hell out of a car regardless of price.
Now in the last few years Mercedes has been trying to get much closer to that original way of thinking, and dumping the 'CLK' badge is a symbolic way of shedding that part of their history.
11/25/09
11/25/09
This reminds me of when Just Right cereal was made "new and improved" and yet somehow remained "just right."
11/25/09
11/25/09
When the Gerrrmans start toying with Newspeak, run.
11/25/09
Mind you, so does the word "Firefox".
11/25/09
In 2025, when it's suffered 95%+ depreciation.
Mercedes, thank you for making quality, luxurious, beater cars.
11/25/09
Really, anyone that buys a new E-class (non-AMG) is a fool. However, without these fools, I suppose we wouldn't have a selection of luxury beaters.
11/25/09
Exactly.
As a bonus, they're so expensive, initially, the original owner tends to keep them up quite well and amortizes the cost over a longer period, so a 12 year old Benz/BMW/Jag/other high-end ride has seen less neglect/abuse than a 4 year old commoner's car.
However, I still kinda want a 2010 CTS-V in about 2013-2015.
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
The mid-sized coupe was always badged 'E', and the CLK was more a product of late-'90s marketing than anything else. It was supposed to connote the 'new' Mercedes philosophy of lighter and relatively less-expensive cars.
Unfortunately this ultimately went over like a lead balloon as the new MB products from this era were pretty unanimously considered crap compared to the 'old' Mercedes philosophy of building the hell out of a car regardless of price.
Now in the last few years Mercedes has been trying to get much closer to that original way of thinking, and dumping the 'CLK' badge is a symbolic way of shedding that part of their history.
11/25/09
11/25/09
Yawngasmic
A car that totally fails to harden my brustwarts
11/25/09
Nicely played.
11/25/09
Thank gott for middle aged realtors.
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
Superfeh. The E-Class coupe. Whatev.
Superfidy. The E-Class coupe. You'll never buy one.
11/25/09