good move GM. Way to do the same as all the other lenders below you. A car you can take back and regain your losses from pretty easially compaired to a house.
Houses are immobile, unlike cars. Houses have land tied to them--even if the house is destroyed, there's still value.
For gross recovery values, a lender usually gets about 70%+ of the value of a foreclosed home (before fees), while a car is usually under 50% (minivans and crappy compacts, about 30%!).
9 times out of 10, a million dollars in foreclosed houses will lose far less than a million dollars in cars.
@jbownsabmw but still wants GM to survive: Let's use the 80/20 rule for profits and losses for a second. The lowest 20% of the credit scores will provide 80% of the profit and 80% of the losses. However, when times get tough, those groups often provide 90% of the losses or more.
So sometimes the easiest thing to do is just to cut off the lower 20% of your customers (or even the bottom 50%, possibly eliminating 95% of all potential losses) in order to simply keep the ship afloat...and to be able to reduce overhead in loan servicing (such as repos).
The rub is that you might break even, but at least you don't get hit with the massive downside in losses. And the other side of that coin is that when (if) things turn around for the better, your portfolio is not profitable because all your customers are upstanding individuals who never miss a payment.
Coming from the world of consumer lending, 620 is about our median customer. That's far from "crappy" in the consumer world. In fact, that's about the highest floor I'd allow if I ever expected to make a profit.
12/30/08
12/30/08
this is good news here.
12/30/08
Houses are immobile, unlike cars. Houses have land tied to them--even if the house is destroyed, there's still value.
For gross recovery values, a lender usually gets about 70%+ of the value of a foreclosed home (before fees), while a car is usually under 50% (minivans and crappy compacts, about 30%!).
9 times out of 10, a million dollars in foreclosed houses will lose far less than a million dollars in cars.
12/30/08
I would venture to guess there was not a single person at GMAC who believed requiring a 700 was good business practice.
12/30/08
So sometimes the easiest thing to do is just to cut off the lower 20% of your customers (or even the bottom 50%, possibly eliminating 95% of all potential losses) in order to simply keep the ship afloat...and to be able to reduce overhead in loan servicing (such as repos).
The rub is that you might break even, but at least you don't get hit with the massive downside in losses. And the other side of that coin is that when (if) things turn around for the better, your portfolio is not profitable because all your customers are upstanding individuals who never miss a payment.
12/30/08
12/30/08
12/30/08
12/30/08
12/30/08
12/30/08
12/30/08