Not to be morbid, but when 'ol Shelby goes to the great racetrack in the sky, what will happen to Shelby cars? I like the GT500 strictly for performance sake, I could care less about it being a collectible or worth money in the future. When you buy a car, your first priority should not be to make money down the line. I really doubt these cars will be worth so much in the future because of the name. The older cars, yes, not the newer ones.
After driving a new Camaro as a rental, I need to go look at a Mustang. Theres hardly any headroom in a Camaro. It makes me feel, well, like I am ducking my head while driving. And this is from a Corvette owner. Maybe it's because I have a clear roof in the Corvette?
Three stars for value because the $32K GT Track Pack is almost as much fun to drive? Okay, I really like that spec of the GT, too, and if it were mah own money that's the way I'd go.
But how could you ignore measuring the value of the Shelby in the other direction? Specifically, how does this $50K/540hp Shelby stack up value-wise against the $100K/620hp ZR1? Is it a three-star value in that light, too?
@Wes Siler: Fair enough, but what about against the $75K Z06, which is closer in power (505 vs 540) and also shares the less-than-wonderful interior of the lesser models? Or dollar-for-dollar, the Shelby against a base Corvette?
I'm not bringing these up because I'm trying to stoke the Chevy-Ford flame wars, but this is an honest 500hp car with better handling than any Mustang should ever have, for less than $50K. If this is three stars, what the hell does someone have to do to get four?
Regarding the non-telescoping wheel, my biggest complaint against Mustangs has always been the poor ergonomics for me. At 6'3" I have the same problem Wes described, that to get the seat positioned right I end up extending my arms to reach the steering wheel more than in other cars. And on that same note, I have to reach for the shifter rather than it being in a more natural location.
Not to ignite the whole Ford vs Chevy thing (seriously, I like Mustangs), but I never had a fitment problem in a Camaro.
@v250gto: Of course, and I've driven the car on a track too. It's faster with stability on and traction off; you can use the power and it understeers less. With everything off you just end up understeering initially, then sliding all over the place. It's not uncontrollable, but it's not fast either.
@Wes Siler: Have computer controlled driving aids improved so dramatically in recent years, or are there now more cases in which they are used to as a cheap fix for dynamic shortcomings?
@v250gto: The horsepower wars have kinda ruined cars in that we now have a plethora of vehicles that weigh 4,000lbs+ have super wide tires and wouldn't do anything but spin once the limits of that traction is broken. Hence the need for all these crazy stability control systems.
Cars are faster than ever, yet harder to drive on the limit than ever.
I still don't like the grouper-mouth grille on the Shelby. Does it really need the massive front openings and the bulked-up hood? Also, any true Shelby Mustang (at least after '66) should have wide taillights.
@skaycog.2000: It seems like a lot of Ford GT owners tend to buy these cars then total them before the first payment comes due.
It might be expensive to get insurance after this, though, so it's a stunt you might only be able to pull off once. But you could have loads of fun for 29 days...
What's your problem with MyColor? Sure, it's not an earth-shattering feature, but I've wanted to change the dash light coloring at least a bit on every car I've ever owned except my 2004 Acura TSX.
@dal20402: just use white numbers on a black background and red lighting. Job done. Anything else is just added cost and complication that would be better spent elsewhere.
@Wes Siler: The red lighting is one of my few complaints about my current car. It looks angry and in-your-face at night. I'd rather have a nice neutral white or even light green, and I would have paid money for the ability to change it.
I've owned several cars with various shades of green backlighting and one with white backlighting and never had the slightest problem with my night vision while driving any of them.
@bmoreDLJ: I don't think the numbers on the nameplate of a Shelby Mustang have ever referred to anything. Legend has it that when coming up with the name for the GT350, Shelby told someone to walk to some point and count the steps, and rounded from there (or something like that).
Edited by snapoversteer 'bout to get told at 11/19/09 4:57 PM
snapoversteer 'bout to get told was starred
snapoversteer 'bout to get told was unstarred
Me want. I am sure the regular 2011 GT with track pack would be more than enough but I've always liked SVT products. Of course, it would be a big step up from my lil' SVTF I currently drive.
11/20/09
11/20/09
11/21/09
11/20/09
11/19/09
11/20/09
11/19/09
But how could you ignore measuring the value of the Shelby in the other direction? Specifically, how does this $50K/540hp Shelby stack up value-wise against the $100K/620hp ZR1? Is it a three-star value in that light, too?
11/20/09
11/20/09
I'm not bringing these up because I'm trying to stoke the Chevy-Ford flame wars, but this is an honest 500hp car with better handling than any Mustang should ever have, for less than $50K. If this is three stars, what the hell does someone have to do to get four?
11/20/09
11/19/09
Not to ignite the whole Ford vs Chevy thing (seriously, I like Mustangs), but I never had a fitment problem in a Camaro.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/20/09
I am 27 in school and have done nothing for a living...something went wrong.
11/20/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
sounds perfectly sorted to me
kinda like an abs-pseudo-limited slip
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
Cars are faster than ever, yet harder to drive on the limit than ever.
11/19/09
11/19/09
I still don't like the grouper-mouth grille on the Shelby. Does it really need the massive front openings and the bulked-up hood? Also, any true Shelby Mustang (at least after '66) should have wide taillights.
11/20/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
It might be expensive to get insurance after this, though, so it's a stunt you might only be able to pull off once. But you could have loads of fun for 29 days...
11/19/09
@skaycog.2000: Why not dream of both? I do.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
I've owned several cars with various shades of green backlighting and one with white backlighting and never had the slightest problem with my night vision while driving any of them.
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/19/09
11/19/09