Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #45lduramaxdiesel more →
GM Shelves 4.5-Liter Duramax Diesel, Engine Dorks Weep
2010 4.5L Duramax Diesel has Shockingly Brilliant Design


03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
If you really want a small diesel truck, it's time to start rooting for Mahindra.
03/11/09
03/11/09
* here CGI = "Compacted Graphite Iron", not Pixar animation or desktop computers...
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
That said, did you know that Caterpillar Engine will no longer offer a highway specific engine after 2009? They could not clean up their engine to meet the new standards, and Navistar is trying to get a one year waver from the EPA for their Durastar Truck Engines, because it looks like they won't meet the standards either.
03/11/09
This is frowned upon for touchy-feely sensitivity reasons, but I've always been a big fan of lining up a group that needs to be thinned, and (figuratively) shooting the non-performers. This often causes the more motivated team members to "encourage" the marginal performers who are left to step it up and often makes the smaller team more productive after downsizing.
03/11/09
Hey, Pete! I understand why there's no edit button, but can we please have our preview button back? It makes proofreading a whole lot easier...
03/11/09
speaking as a 'bean counter' and a former SAE member I'll say that cuts are usually made my the marketing and production types. Us finance peeps just give the options.
GM has to conserve cash, if they don't do that they'll be bankrupt. Unfortunately for them that means that they have to stop something.
Stop this - an engine for pickups and light trucks - vehicles that aren't selling; or stop something else. This is a nice engine that doesn't have a large enough market to support the costs in a short enough time.
While your lining up folks (figuratively) start with the marketing types that put all their eggs in the SUV basket.
The don't need a 4.5L, they need a 2.8L diesel.
03/11/09
I do agree that GM could make much better use of a smaller diesel right now, and that this is probably better suited to a 1 ton truck than a half-ton, but if you're not making what people think they want to buy, you're not going to sell enough vehicles to stay afloat.
Also- FWIW, I don't think bankruptcy would necessarily be a bad thing for GM. There are obviously some fundamental flaws in the current system, and if the guv'mint keeps giving them money, those issues will never be addressed and failure will only be postponed.
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
This comment is sarcastic.
03/11/09
It's too early to be so confused.
03/11/09
FWIW the new Cobalt SS is bad ass, and powerful.
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
At least us engine-nerds can still drool over the BMW 4.4L TT with the turbos in the valley. Wacky Germans.
03/11/09
The only "downfall" to this engine was it wasn't going to be overbuilt the way the big D-maxes are. You get an engine capable of 1000 ft-lbs stock, although it is "only" set up for 660 or so. That is great for those interested in tuning, but it drove unnecessary costs for everyone else.
The 4.5 was designed around the amount of torque it will make, not "could." I would have thought the pricing to be much more competitive with the gas engines, but with much better performance, both towing and milage.
I wonder how much of this has to do with all of the bullshit regulations being placed on diesels in the coming years. The DPF destroys all value of newer rigs, until you remove it.
03/11/09
As cool as it is, I can't help but think that all the guys I see in lifted Duramax trucks with dual 3" pipes spewing black smoke at idle aren't exactly helping diesel's mainstream acceptance. But it's still cool.
03/11/09
And, here's one with the sensors connected.
Good luck trying to get your new electronically controlled Turbo Diesel to run without the DPF.
03/11/09
Haha, well, you better tell that to the thousands of guys out there with NO DPF, and a simple reflash of the ECM.
Now, if you want to tell them "good luck" getting warranty work, than you are right. Otherwise, it is pretty simple to remove the DPF and very commonly done. On the LMM D-Maxes with DPF, you may only get 14 mpg, without, you can see 18-19 (I don't believe the claims of people getting better).
03/11/09
If the US EPA keeps tightening the emission levels, there will only be wheezing small engines available anyway. And if you are thinking about keeping older iron, just watch out for the pending scrapping rules that will soon be upon us.... It's happening across the pond right now.
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
03/11/09
And what did Nibbles do to the preview button? Do I even want to know?
03/11/09