I almost didn't come here, thinking that this was an advertisement for Audi.
Now that I'm here, though, I'm glad I came.
By the looks of it, there is only slightly more cargo space advantage over a sedan. I don't understand these things at all. The same functionality of a sedan without the good looks. Weren't they supposed to add something nice instead of take it all away?
@DonLuc: er, A5 comes only as a coupe at the moment, and speaking as an Audi owner, I can tell you that although the trunks are quite commodious, the openings are small enough to reduce overall utility.
@Ben Wojdyla: Absolutely. I don't see this as looking worse (hatchhater!), and the utility of a hatch is huge over the A5's standard trunk opening. Audi probably would've made the A5 like this outright if Americans didn't have such a hatch stigma.
Whoa whoa whoa...I'm not a hatch hater--I drive an Explorer after all--it has a HUGE hatch--haha. It's just that this particular model seems to open up very long, but the space inside is still rather short vertically like a sedan.
And I love the Avants--probably the only wagon I'd own.
@Ben Wojdyla: It's the Cyclone effect. Murilee told me after I submitted a couple photos of a '68 Fairlane 500 fastback that while he owned his Fairlane and Cyclone, he kept a broomstick with a hook on the end so he could fish things out of the huge trunk through the tiny opening.
@Sportwagons have hustle AND bustle: If I'm not mistaken, one could only get a 5-speed in the IS300 sedan, and only after its second year. My dad had an '01 and even with the auto it's the most fun car I've ever driven. I would rock a manual SportCross so damned hard.
@seoultrain: dual clutch only, and probably still 2k more than the WRX. once Subie upped the power and kept the price under 25k, it sort of killed any interest I had in the Ralliart...
@IH_kumicho: Unfortunate that I really can't get behind the look of the new WRX. The Lancer, on the other hand, took a number of steps in the right direction.
I just want to know why I have to choose between 69 horses and a damned clutch pedal. That's shitty.
LIKEY and screw the image. It'll only stick to you if you 1) are close enough in A/S/L to the demographic and/or 2) have little enough self-control to delve (read: wallow) in their shit. Be an adult. Rise above! Fight! WIN!
06/26/09
Shit's still cool.
06/26/09
06/26/09
Now that I'm here, though, I'm glad I came.
By the looks of it, there is only slightly more cargo space advantage over a sedan. I don't understand these things at all. The same functionality of a sedan without the good looks. Weren't they supposed to add something nice instead of take it all away?
06/26/09
06/26/09
06/26/09
Whoa whoa whoa...I'm not a hatch hater--I drive an Explorer after all--it has a HUGE hatch--haha. It's just that this particular model seems to open up very long, but the space inside is still rather short vertically like a sedan.
And I love the Avants--probably the only wagon I'd own.
06/26/09
Don't think I don't love the idea of a shooting brake too, but that's going to have a seriously limited audience, n'est ce pas?
06/26/09
06/26/09
06/28/09
06/26/09
06/26/09
06/27/09
Damn Germans marketing people, always messing up my s**t.
06/26/09
06/26/09
06/26/09
06/26/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
As I think of it, they'd be more like a BRAT, since you could get them with T-tops.
01/30/09
01/30/09
01/31/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
Wagon-fearers (aka fools) still won't like it, but it doesn't really offer the dog/bike hauling room that a real wagon brings.
The net result is like a girl who's kinda chunky, but not quite filled out to be called curvy or voluptuous. No thanks.
01/30/09
PS kinda chunky= big boned.
01/30/09
The utility's just not there.
01/30/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
I just want to know why I have to choose between 69 horses and a damned clutch pedal. That's shitty.
01/30/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
01/30/09
Get one in a nice cocoa brown with a manual 2.4.
Should be a fun useful ride at reasonable cost.