@Ash87: I don't disagree (parents just spent $30k on a Passat Lux 2.0t) with any of that...but still, part of me thinks there's a temporary "fuel efficiency freakout" going on, as well.
I'm also just using the same flawed logic here that causes people to keep criticizing Acura for lacking a V8. It's just an impression thing, I guess.
@Ash91: Keep in mind I'm talking about the Audi 90-degree 3.2 V6, not the VW VR6 of the same displacement--that's the R32 and A3 engine. The Audi V6 engines that went into the A4 are very solid. A lot of room for confusion since we're talking about 2 different platforms and engines with the same displacement. My mistake for not being more clear on that.
For the record, all things considered, I'd also take the current 2.0t over anything else. They've really perfected it.
Could this move be a way to make room for diesel options? In spite of the very poor dependability of my 2001 A6 2.7T, I am leaning towards an A4 2.0 Avant next time. If they offer the 3.0 diesel in an A4 that will be very tempting. If they put it in the Avant, I'll be sold.
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was starred
If FromaBuick6 has to watch one more Chevy commercial, he's going to punch Howie Long in the face was unstarred
@Ash78: Forgot to mention reliability, which was also NOT a strong suit of the 1.8t (compared to the solid Audi V6 engines). This also seems to have improved a LOT with the 2.0t.
It makes sense. The 1.8t was nice, but it was just a little too "rough" and laggy to really compete against the nice torque from the 2.8 and 3.2 V6 engines. But the 2.0t has really improved on both of those negatives. With current tuning, it could easily replace most V6 engines.
The last sticking point is whether luxury buyers will accept it. In the US, a $30k+ car without 6+ cylinders can be a tough sell.
@Ash78: The luxury buyers that have been buying the 2.0T over the 3.2 nine to one? Most buyers in this entry-level luxury range aren't gonna care much about the number of cylinders, they're gonna be looking at the price sheets, and some (like us) will recognise that the 2.0T is so much engine for the money that the 3.2 isn't worth it.
@Ash87: Remember, customers only buy what the dealer orders.
The 2.0T, automatic, FWD sedan is their "$399 lease special" so you're going to find boatloads of them on the lot. Additionally, around here most Audi loan car fleets are made up of the same car so you're going to see even more of them ordered even though customers aren't buying them (until they become CPO cars.)
The few 3.2 A4's I've seen on dealer's lots are so heavily optioned they're bumping into A6 price territory ($40K plus) so that might be another part of the problem.
@Gearhead's Garage: If a customer's gonna be satisfied with "what's on the lot", then engine choice must not be all that important to him. If someone really believes that a luxury car should have at least a six, and really wants an A4, he's gonna wait, he's gonna special order, or he's gonna buy a 3 series.
The very fact that customers will buy what the dealer has ordered instead of what they really want shows that all they really want is style or a badge or a nice place to sit.
04/22/09
Will the real Ash please stand up?
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
I'm also just using the same flawed logic here that causes people to keep criticizing Acura for lacking a V8. It's just an impression thing, I guess.
04/22/09
For the record, all things considered, I'd also take the current 2.0t over anything else. They've really perfected it.
04/22/09
In spite of the very poor dependability of my 2001 A6 2.7T, I am leaning towards an A4 2.0 Avant next time.
If they offer the 3.0 diesel in an A4 that will be very tempting. If they put it in the Avant, I'll be sold.
04/22/09
Diesel's 15 mins have just about gone for the MASS public... It carries a steadily more expensive cost.
I'm with you though; Diesel A4/5/6 and Avants where applicable... mouthwatering.
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
I'll admit that they don't sound too impressive, and there's some definite turbo-lag with the 1.8T. But against their competition, hey.
04/22/09
04/22/09
And the v6 makes the A3/4 ungainly. I don't think this is a bad move at all.
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
04/22/09
Yeah, we're car enthusiasts, I shouldn't even be asking that question. But the point still stands.
04/22/09
04/22/09
The last sticking point is whether luxury buyers will accept it. In the US, a $30k+ car without 6+ cylinders can be a tough sell.
04/22/09
04/22/09
Remember, customers only buy what the dealer orders.
The 2.0T, automatic, FWD sedan is their "$399 lease special" so you're going to find boatloads of them on the lot. Additionally, around here most Audi loan car fleets are made up of the same car so you're going to see even more of them ordered even though customers aren't buying them (until they become CPO cars.)
The few 3.2 A4's I've seen on dealer's lots are so heavily optioned they're bumping into A6 price territory ($40K plus) so that might be another part of the problem.
04/22/09
The very fact that customers will buy what the dealer has ordered instead of what they really want shows that all they really want is style or a badge or a nice place to sit.