I hate to say it, but the raised-wagon perfectly meets the requirments that most people buy CUVs or SUVs for.
Provided your most grueling terrain never goes beyond the occasional dirt road or snow and you don't need to tow > 2000lbs, something like this gets the job done perfectly in a way that the "normal" car-based ones can't.
My problem is that they tend to crowd out the "normal" wagons. e.g. We can't get a Legacy wagon in the US b/c the Outback is the sales leader.
Well, I realize I'm not the customer they're going for- I'm a 32-y.o. carpenter from the boonies who actually uses his pickup, plus this car is not 20 years old, rusted half to death, with a 200K mile 6-cylinder, being sold off the lawn of some guy with a roughly equal tooth/IQ count, but- I like it, despite the fact that it's an overpriced VW (redundant?), and they totally fail at the trapezoid grille. (For examples of Trapezoid WIN, please see: 1957-64 Chrysler.)
I'm catching a few lost-in-translation bobbles, but by and large this is far and away the best-written press release I've seen in a long time. Not a lot of BS, mostly it's conversationally clear and concise.
How much torque from the little TDI? That's the mill I'd ride behind. Those little turboilburners make some serious twist, totally blows away your old impression of diesels. Gear 'em low - wanna go fast? Stick your foot in, and keep it there.
I hate this Allroad business just as much as I hate the Outback and V70 XC. All these cars in regular Legacy, A4, A6, and V70 form are perfectly fine on their own. Hell, I own two of them. I just don't understand the thinking behind adding body cladding and raising the suspension. These cars typically do not spend much time off road.
What I do really like is the prospect of replacing my 2002 A4 Avant with a A4 (non-Allroad) 3.0 TDI in about five years.
@joshman: I agreed with you when I lived in California, but now that I'm in the frozen Northeast, the V70 XC looks pretty appealing. The standard V70 is FWD-only, and I need the extra traction and ride height to get up a hilly, unplowed driveway with eight inches of snow and ice on it. As for the body cladding, the underside of my (black) Lexus looks like a science experiment after three months of ice and salted roads, so I appreciate the plastic; I even think it helps the Volvo's otherwise somewhat slab-sided lines.
But the Audi is a slightly smaller (albeit better-looking and quicker) version of the same thing for (probably) another $20,000, at which price point you can have a 530xi. So hell no, I don't understand it.
@joshman: The wife has a 2004 XC70. The reason is camping/boy scouts. There is a difference in what you can get to on rutted dirt roads. And it isn't one of those hideous XC90 SUV's. Allroads are similar. There is a reason that they are made, and it isn't simply style.
You'd be hard-pressed to find a more expensive-to-own and problematic car than the previous Allroad with 2.7tt and the air suspension. This should be better, but I just don't see how big the market is for an extra inch of ground clearance and some plastic cladding.
@Syrax: Yeah, that stat kinda made my pants tighten a lil bit. I have a hard time coming up with reasons that having that in my car would somehow suck.
You mean I can have my A4 avant with poorer gas mileage, body cladding stolen off a base Subaru and a higher price? I'll stick with the Audi Someroad, thanks.
I'd buy a raised hatch or wagon over a SUV any day. I drive on a lot of bad roads, but don't need an offroader - just something that I don't have to worry about when driving 50-100 miles on dirt.
At first I was a little disappointed we wouldn't be getting this in the States...but now I'm not so much. It'd be way too expensive, and it offers relatively little in the ways of appealing to Americans. It straddles that awkward line between wagon and SUV that Americans hate so much.
03/03/09
Provided your most grueling terrain never goes beyond the occasional dirt road or snow and you don't need to tow > 2000lbs, something like this gets the job done perfectly in a way that the "normal" car-based ones can't.
My problem is that they tend to crowd out the "normal" wagons. e.g. We can't get a Legacy wagon in the US b/c the Outback is the sales leader.
03/03/09
03/03/09
I think Legacy:Outback was like 1:8.
03/03/09
You mean fatter, and with more electrical problems?
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
What I do really like is the prospect of replacing my 2002 A4 Avant with a A4 (non-Allroad) 3.0 TDI in about five years.
03/03/09
But the Audi is a slightly smaller (albeit better-looking and quicker) version of the same thing for (probably) another $20,000, at which price point you can have a 530xi. So hell no, I don't understand it.
03/03/09
03/03/09
A little wispy one.
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
Disturbingly, disappointingly large.
03/03/09
500 Nm of torque to the crankshaft at 1,500 to 3,000 rpm. Just wanted to make sure it was noticed.
03/03/09
I guess German lesbian granolas need to have a *fun* car, too.
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
"I have embraced the love which dare not speak its name. Ve met at the LPGA tour. Her name... is Unibrau."
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
@Ash78:
I'd buy a raised hatch or wagon over a SUV any day. I drive on a lot of bad roads, but don't need an offroader - just something that I don't have to worry about when driving 50-100 miles on dirt.
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
03/03/09
Yeah, a four-banger in a $50,000+ car seems like a poor value.
03/03/09
03/03/09
Ah well, maybe I can get a Rabbit CC soon.