Conan will stop calling it the "corral," and start calling it "the ranch."
Too bad it weighs so much. Too bad it's so damned big.
Tight end speed, but linebacker build. Forget it. I mean, I really like it what with the juicy engine and really great performance numbers, but I can't see saddling myself with all that extra mass.
@Adamskiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiy: I don't have any memories of the first SHO, but I was watching TV with my dad the other day and he pretty much let out the biggest WTF when the new commercial called it the "Show." Now I don't know what to call it; SHOW like the advertisements or S H O like the old one.
Don't replace the old one, Conan, keep it and accept the new one. If they're not fulla shit, i.e. no strings attached. No Cash for Clunkers here, hang onto your old steed. I mean, why give up something that suits you just fine? Hell, it's YOURS.
If Ford told me to give up my '66 F100 in return for a brand new F150 I'd laugh at them. Seriously. That's how much I like my truck. Suits me just fine.
@underwear-ninja: I think that dark green and the almost identical dark blue were the only colors they actually produced. Anything else had to be a dealer option.
Heck yes! I actually thought of Conan the first time I saw the new SHO, wondering if he'd replace his New York SHO with a new LA SHO, keep that around for 15+ years. It'd be a great gimmick, "I got a new Show, so I figured it was time to get a new SHO."
@fuzzmanmatt: it works even better because whoever does the Ford ads pronounces it "Taurus Show". there's also a line in there about the "twin-turbocharging, 365-horsepower-generating EcoBoost engine," which just sounds wrong. i guess i don't "speak car" like Ford does.
@wojo-the newly visible man-ardi: awesome comment, great job!: This is a lot like my last one! Meanwhile, Mulally was dreaming about giving Jimmy Kimmel a new Fusion!
I would think an AWD Flex with the same engine would be more desirable. No SHO should be >3500 lbs. And they should have 6 speed manuals. Otherwise, I really no point to them. Especially at this Gross Vehicle Weight. And I use the word GROSS advisedly.
"Had the car been called the Mandel Bread Ecoboost we'd be pleasantly surprised by its competence and quality, but badged as a SHO, we were disappointed..."
We want to wipe out "Holden GTO syndrome" in YOUR car's lifetime.
Ford has benchmarked the $60,950, 350 HP Audi A6 4.2 and the $37,995 SHO exceeds expectations by being better to drive, faster, larger inside and nicer looking.
@Unregular: Definitely a beholder thing. The one thing that Audi never seems to get right in its cars is the roofline. The new A5 is better, but not still leaves a little something to be desired.
The Taurus, on the other hand, suffers from no such mis-proportioning.
Ford really needs to shoehorn this engine into the fusion. And then call that the fusion SHO. And offer it in manual-only. And it would be the spiritual successor to the original Taurus SHO.
It sounds like it's a quick, comfortable, good handling car that just isn't quite the same as its much smaller adn lighter 89-95 predecessor. So not flat out badass when measured against the original and the 2nd gen, but really pretty good compared to other currently available new cars.
We need some info on why that 133mph speed limiter is there - is it just a politically correct thing, or will we break something (engine, trans, propshaft) or leave the surface of the earth if we program it away and run the 155+ that this thing must be capable of based on frontal area and horsepower?
09/10/09
essss
aaaaaach
oooooo
NOT SHOW.
09/10/09
Too bad it weighs so much. Too bad it's so damned big.
Tight end speed, but linebacker build. Forget it. I mean, I really like it what with the juicy engine and really great performance numbers, but I can't see saddling myself with all that extra mass.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
If Ford told me to give up my '66 F100 in return for a brand new F150 I'd laugh at them. Seriously. That's how much I like my truck. Suits me just fine.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
06/20/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
We want to wipe out "Holden GTO syndrome" in YOUR car's lifetime.
06/19/09
waaaaaiiiiit just a minute here.
nicer looking?
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
The Taurus, on the other hand, suffers from no such mis-proportioning.
06/19/09
06/19/09
06/19/09
We need some info on why that 133mph speed limiter is there - is it just a politically correct thing, or will we break something (engine, trans, propshaft) or leave the surface of the earth if we program it away and run the 155+ that this thing must be capable of based on frontal area and horsepower?
06/19/09