Saab is like one of those actors you thought was dead. They show up looking tired, out of place and uncomfortable but their agent can still pull some strings to get them airtime.
Okay, stupid special edition, stupid price. But it's entirely possible right now to buy pretty much any 2008 Saab, even a vert. and 9-7x, for less than $30K. I would definitely shop it against the competition in that price range.
The key, really, is to either buy off lease or buy a clean used example. The newer Saabs are much more refined than the old Vectra 9-3 clone, however, which is rather berserk on boost.
@Deartháir: And I would totally buy one -- off lease. The depreciation on these is enormous. Could probably be picked up for $19k CDN. Yes, the price is too steep, but there's something about Saabs that just make me love them... even though it hurts.
@layabout: Possibly. I have no particular loyalty to new Volkswagens. They're nice and all, but they're nothing really special. (I have a ton of respect for the parent company, though.)
The Audis... yes, their high-end, powerful cars make me tingly in my naughty bits, but the rest aren't really... exciting.
There's just something quirky and weird about a Saab. You know they're not all that great, you know they're not REALLY a luxury car, you know they've been raped, pillaged and plundered by the General... but somehow, still, when you see them, you smirk and think, "Heh. Cool."
If I'm not mistaken, GM built this car by putting a truly miniscule turbo on the rather unpleasant old Vauxhall Vectra and then taking a tin opener to it. As the CTS-V and Corvette ZR-1 (faster AND more comfortable than the Z06? Woot!) show, it's quite possible for GM to make a car that even Clarkson adores...but here, they've really fallen short.
What would have been much better is if they started with the 260HP engine out of the hot Astra and slotted it in a modified chassis. Turbo Saabs are supposed to be berserk, not bland.
I'll shamefully admit I had no idea about Saab MSRP over the past decade. However, I've driven a few and I've read the specs. This is a low-$30k range car. I was floored to see the price. I think Saab is suffering from Volvitis: An enhanced sense of one's own position in the competitive landscape (or in another sense, maybe "if we price it there, people will automatically cross-shop it with nicer cars and assume the same about us")
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
I like the 900 convertibles up to and including the '90s version. The switch to the 9-3 body style as a drop-top does nothing for me.
11/12/08
The key, really, is to either buy off lease or buy a clean used example. The newer Saabs are much more refined than the old Vectra 9-3 clone, however, which is rather berserk on boost.
11/12/08
The Saab 900 should have been renamed the Saab 9^3.05903274, not the Saab 9^3. More precisely, it should have been the Saab 9^(ln(900)/ln(3)).
The Saab 9000 is even trickier. It seems that Saab rounded up very ambitiously from the Saab 9^4.143854911 to the Saab 9^5.
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
The Audis... yes, their high-end, powerful cars make me tingly in my naughty bits, but the rest aren't really... exciting.
There's just something quirky and weird about a Saab. You know they're not all that great, you know they're not REALLY a luxury car, you know they've been raped, pillaged and plundered by the General... but somehow, still, when you see them, you smirk and think, "Heh. Cool."
11/12/08
What would have been much better is if they started with the 260HP engine out of the hot Astra and slotted it in a modified chassis. Turbo Saabs are supposed to be berserk, not bland.
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08
11/12/08