Jalopnik 
Enter your username and password.
Detroit, 12:53 PM
Tue Dec 8
26 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Ray Wert | | AIM
Road Test Editor:
Wes Siler |
Weekend Editor:
Murilee Martin |
Associate Editor - Houston:
Associate Editor - Detroit:
Editor-at-Large:
Contributors:
John Krewson |
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
10/13/09
How will people distinguish between all their offerings that are so similar?
IMO they should have kept it truck based BoF or killed it, and not cannibalized their own sales.
10/13/09
I think putting the Explorer on a car platform is a supreme mistake. They've already got two car platform based SUVs, why not leave one based on a truck platform for those people who want a sturdier undercarriage and plan to really use the U part of their SUV?!
10/13/09
10/13/09
"so we think we should revive a model that made ford great in this turnaround we're having"
"great idea, but which model?"
"something that was respected and fun to drive, but something the kids will like."
"what do the kids like nowadays?"
"hey, I got it, the Thunderbird!"
"I think we need a car the public will view as responsible, now we've really got to think here. What else can we make?
"An SUV!!!"
...just great.
10/13/09
10/13/09
/dream
10/13/09
A new FS Bronco would be awesome. A new Bronco II would be depressing.
10/13/09
11/03/08
11/03/08
...they want to sit on top of everyone else, that's why.
11/03/08
What say you, Ford fans?
11/03/08
11/03/08
The answer was to take the Explorer to softroader status and send the Taurus X to an early grave.
There was a real smaller truck version that would be shared with the aging Ranger, but I believe that group has closed up shop. When asking about their futures I just get blank stares.
11/03/08
11/03/08
11/03/08
Build a new explorer. Build it as a truck, with a truck frame and a proper diesel or v8 with a 6 or 7 speed transmission. Build only a limited number per year. That way you aren't producing 1 billion more SUVs, but people who can actually need one can still buy one. I still guarantee you'd build more than necessary. People who really need one can fuckin' pay for it. And if you don't need one, which you don't, you can find a Flex on the lot instead.
11/03/08
11/03/08
11/03/08
That car-based thing is such blasphemy. Keep it the damn Taurus X and build a real Explorer. I want to explore more than just the suburbs, malls, and maybe the neighbor's flowerbed when I accidentally off-road through it.
Why can't we have small, capable off-road vehicles anymore? The only decent 4x4s are all full size, and even the Wrangler has gotten bigger than necessary.
11/03/08
11/03/08
Seems like they took home the message that we need to make SUVs more fuel efficient and car-like.
...when what we need is good cars. Ford's going to spend all this time developing too-tall-too-heavy CUVs that maybe buyers will migrate to for briefly, but the overall trend is to cars: coupes, sedans, wagons, ya know?
11/03/08
Explorer - Far away, uncharted land.
Expedition - Closer, but still on the maps.
Excursion - Let's go have a picnic in the burbs.
So far, their crossovers seem to be named on relative stiffness, decreasing with size:
Edge - Rigid, sharp.
Flex - A little bit bendy.
2011 Explorer? - Will probably be renamed the Ford Flop. This might happen a year or two into the production cycle of course...
11/03/08
11/03/08
11/03/08
To replace the Taurus X.
11/03/08
11/03/08