@jingleballz: Falwell has passed away. But before he died, in '07, he said: "If he's pro-life, pro-family, I don't think he'll have any problem getting the support of evangelical Christians." [www.nysun.com]
Robertson invited Romney to speak at his Regent University in '07, though he did later endorse Giuliani instead.
Dobson appeared via video at Beck's rally earlier this year. When Dobson initially endorsed Huckabee in '07, he said: "I don't believe that conservative Christians in large numbers will vote for a Mormon but that remains to be seen, I guess."
Romney did receive endorsement from Moral Majority co-founder Paul Weyrich and conservative Bob Jones III last time around.
When the focus is Obama, these guys will line up behind each other. Robertson didn't like McCain either, but once Palin was on board, he was more than willing to jump on the doomed ship.
@mozzy: That is a huge concern and I think it made a difference in 2006.
However, I really think Beck has been able to make Mormonism seem more like a mainstream sect, which is how many Protestants view Catholicism.
There's still a significant divide between Catholics and Protestants on theological issues, but the Christian Right still seems to be able to come together when it comes time to vote. If you keep the religious language very simple, like Beck did at his rally, people will be able to set the theology aside and focus on Tea Party stuff or whatever.
Also, I spelled Haley Barbour's name wrong before.
Here's what I think is her best shot at getting in the White House: Being Romney's VP candidate.
Romney will run, and win the nomination on his business background. But while that gets CEOs fired up at the thought of lower taxes, he doesn't connect with people in the "Heartland" all that well.
Palin would bring to Romney the passionate Tea Partiers, and ease the minds of those on the Christian Right who would have misgivings over his Mormonism. Romney would do the talking and bring in money from the business conservatives. Palin would bring the "grass roots" of the social conservatives.
Now, could she accept being #2 again, or would she continue squabbling like she did with McCain? I don't know. I do think that she's savvy (I don't want to say smart) enough to know that she's got little chance of actually winning the Presidency herself, and that running for the Presidency and losing is a big blow to your public image (and ability to make $$$ and be on TV). All this talk about seriously considering running just keeps her in the spotlight.
Thus, I think there are only two likely options for Palin's future: 1. Settle for a VP slot with a candidate more likely to win. 2. Make all the appearances of considering running, then announcing that she believes she can do more for "her country" by acting as an outsider (and continue making $$$). Then, she'll just do in 2012 what she did in 2010 - being on Fox, making endorsements, and making bank.
If I had to bet, I'd bet on the later.
Also, I think Romney is the only candidate who could possibly beat Obama nationally, and is thus the only one who really scares me.
I think the others (Gingrich, Barber, Thune, Pawlenty, etc) wouldn't stand a chance. Too many negatives or not enough charisma to get out the vote.
@ChristianHL: The only thing that will shrink Facebook's user base is if some new version of social networking comes along and over takes it. (See the fall of Myspace)
If you think the general public is going to just stop using social networking tools, then you're woefully unaware of the power of this innovation in communication.
I'm not a big user of Facebook either, but if you think that its going to go away without something else coming along that you are going to hate just as much, you're in for a long and difficult relationship with technology.