Carl Lagerfeld, on the other hand, is a complete fool.
9.) Diesels are smelly, noisy and slow - Who cares. They don't sell here. Get over it.
8.) If you ride a motorcycle, you will die a horrible early death - It's not s sure thing. But nearly everyone is in an accident at some point. I prefer four contact patches and 3000lbs of steel cushion surrounding me.
7.) There's no substitute for cubic inches - There's no substitute for technology.
6.) Any woman driving a Subaru is a lesbian - If she changes the oil in her Subaru, she is. Not that there's anything wrong with that… ;-)
5.) Miatas are for gay men - Not speaking in absolutes, but they kinda are.
4.) American cars are shoddy unreliable junk purchased by idiots - They used to be. Just like Hyundais used to be. Now they're not. Ironically, now you hear this said more often about Toyota owners.
3.) A Boxster isn't a real Porsche - Probably only douchebags would say that. I consider the Boxter a more "real" Porsche than the Cayenne, the Panamera or even the latest 911.
2.) Anything that has less than 300hp isn't fun or worth driving - Not true. But, all things being equal, having more HP is more fun.
1.) You're compensating - Just a cheap crack by someone who is annoyed by what they see, or who is just jealous.
Not even a question. Total CP
Are you kidding me with this? Have you driven this thing? It was awful. The NSX was a colossal failure. A pretty one... but that's it.
Home Ownership
-The middle class own or plan to own homes, and are at risk of losing them or not being able to afford one. Providing programs that help them increase housing starts or sales of existing homes are positive economic indicators and does a lot to drive tax revenue.
-The wealthy aren't at risk of losing their homes. They are able to take advantage of the depressed housing market. Buying homes at a depressed rate hurts home values and tax revenue.
-The poor don't own. They often don't pay anything for the homes they live in. Renting or section 8 is not an economic indicator.
Employement
-The middle class work, and are at risk of losing their jobs. Or have lost their jobs already. Those who are out of work and are looking for jobs are reflected in the unemployment rate, an economic indicator.
-The wealthy have a larger buffer to compensate for an economic downturn.
-The poors who chronically aren't considered in the unemployment rate. Those who work in the service industry are highly reliant on the middle and upper classes.
Education
-The middle class is largely educated and financially more astute. They are generally equipped to take advantage of upswings in the economy.
-The wealthy are fat and happy regardless.
-A huge segment of the poors are undereducated and will generally remain poor in spite of the endless programs designed to change this reality.
Political Leaning
-The middle class votes about 50% republican and 50% democrat.
-The wealthy vote skews towards republican candidates. Romney is trending even better.
-The poors vote democrat. It's proven difficult to get the poor to vote. If it rains or snows, even fewer democrats turn out to vote.
Fundraising
-The middle class donate to his campaign in small increments. They are also vocal.
-The wealthy also donate to his campaign and rally others, but are limited to something like $2500
- The poor don't donate.
Is it really that difficult to understand why the middle class is his focus. And because he understands this, is why he will probably win.
Since when does purchasing stuff provide a sense of belonging and make you feel like a good citizen? Maybe he could learn a thing from these writers who rent and live in the close-knit neighborhoods in NYC, that there is more to life than accumulating a lot of crap to feel a sense of purpose. I'm all for owning a home, or three. But home ownership isn't for everyone, and your self esteem shouldn't be dependent upon it.