I'd give my worst enemy a 1990-something four-door Civic, automatic transmission, cloth interior, no power anything. It'll run forever, dully and slowly. Eventually he or she may even come to appreciate it; it will never cost too much to fix and will never die catstropically. It will be a prison too dull and reliable to escape, one as insidious and awful as life in the Midwest.
@Obtuse: Ha, my parents had one of those for decades. Made of plastic so it didn't rust it managed to be one of those cars that never needed an expensive repair after the threshold of 'if this car needs an expensive repair we're using that as an excuse to replace it' had been reached.
@dogapult: No, the round headlights and lack of a front mounted radiator clearly disqualify the Vanagon. You can clearly see the recurve in the front in the bay window as, well. In the front view, not shown, the squared-off shape of the windsheild in the Vanagon is clearly incorrect. Finally, the Mystery Machine debuted a full decade before the Vanagon. The real question is what kind of rear has that tuck-in the MM exhibits; probably part of the customisation.
I've really put far too much thought into this over the years.