Here's a quote from Drive's Wikipedia page that describes it:
"It combines comic gore, film noir and B-movie aesthetics, and Hollywood spectacle, resulting in "a bizarre concoction...reminiscent of David Lynch's Mulholland Drive...Quentin Tarantino's Pulp Fiction""
So as far as my 'not getting' Drive, that's possible, but considering the tastes of many of those who 'do get it' and the number of films I've seen, foreign and domestic, my impression is that many were drawn to the cinematography, atmosphere, and pacing of the movie (which I agree are good), and ignored the places where the movie was less than brilliant. And as I mentioned in my first post, I DID want to like it, but I feel like it was a hodgepodge of stock pulp and crime tropes (stunt driver antihero, the mob as an evil entity, typical grimy LA) and plot devices (the ending, the backstabbing 'twists', the dead friend [Cranston]). The whole time I was thinking about True Romance.
Winding Refn has stated that Taxi Driver was an influence, but I think there is no comparison between the two.
Have you seen The Driver (1978)?
EDIT: Back to Drive, I think it's the script and the director, not the supporting cast. I would have liked to see them being used more. I like plenty of movies with sparse dialogue, Drive is just not one of them.
I did appreciate the escalation of violence and the pace that created.
Before the flaming begins, I loved Valhalla Rising. I think these deliver what Drive had promised: The Driver, No Country, Taxi Driver, Repo Man, Tarantino in general, even Collateral.
At the risk of being banned for self promotion (although I think it's relevant here), I've been working on an iOS and Android project that has done the sling mechanic one better, and I really look forward to seeing how it's received when we release in a couple months.
EDIT: thanks for the article, also.