In-ground lift? Check.
Advanced parking system with camera and big screen? Check.
Urinal? Check.
Cabinets absolutely everywhere? Check.
Way way way WAY too clean? Check.
Advanced parking system with camera and big screen? Check.
Urinal? Check.
Cabinets absolutely everywhere? Check.
Way way way WAY too clean? Check.
"He say you Brade Runnuh."
"Tell him I'm eating."
You can't tell me that tunnel at the end wasn't a tip of the monocle to Blade Runner.
"Tell him I'm eating."
You can't tell me that tunnel at the end wasn't a tip of the monocle to Blade Runner.
So, at what point do I get to "meet" the con artist who spent 3 mill of Best Buy's money on supercars?
Advertising isn't so much concerned with us buying the product. They want us to react to the advertisement, to think about it. And if we like it, if it makes us feel smart, maybe we'll associate that positive attitude with the product. They've got 30 seconds to make us laugh or cry. That's it. And for the hardcore, sensible consumers (godblessem') they should be able to find all the details they need on the website. If not, it's a marketing failure. Not an advertising failure.
"I couldn't care if I never drive a new Ferrari again..." I'm sorry, I just kept reading that line over and over. And now I want to beat myself to death with my computer monitor because my life has been an utter, complete waste.
First of all, I freaking love Ghostbusters. Through-out my entire existence it's ranked in my favorite top 3 movies of all time. I wouldn't change a thing.
At the same time, this trailer really got me excited about the possibilities of revisiting the concept and technology in a more serious and dramatic way. Inception has that same sort of quasi-science feel to it, where the dramatic implications go far beyond the grasp of the story devices. So, hell yes I'd pay good money for a re-imagining of a world where 1. ghosts exist, 2. a team of scientists/exterminators hunt them down for money.
At the same time, this trailer really got me excited about the possibilities of revisiting the concept and technology in a more serious and dramatic way. Inception has that same sort of quasi-science feel to it, where the dramatic implications go far beyond the grasp of the story devices. So, hell yes I'd pay good money for a re-imagining of a world where 1. ghosts exist, 2. a team of scientists/exterminators hunt them down for money.
@Daddy Rocket will get the hell out of some groceries: I'm not really a Ford guy, or a Mustang guy, or a muscle car guy, or a domestics guy, or an import guy, or a tuner guy, or an exotics guy, or a classics guy, or an every-day driver guy or a sports car guy, or really a car guy, or even a guy guy...but this guy was a guy like me. I hope they catch the guy.
@BuDaMan: You are thinking of criminal cases. Tort's a little more lax.
That does not look like a woman's arm/hand in picture 1...
What? No stock market jokes?
@ranwhenparked: I don't see why the term "appliance" is derogatory. You forget all that toaster oven technology has done for studio apartment dwellers such as myself.
Oh sweet! I may not be rich but I've got the body of a high roller! 50% there...
So if I'm reading the second and third sentences correctly...
"For the next week, I'll be here to try and add a 'not at all' voice to Jalopnik."
??
"For the next week, I'll be here to try and add a 'not at all' voice to Jalopnik."
??
I see the back, where's the hatch?
@lilwillie: Nice BendPak lift.
@luisthebeast: You can't shoot at cops, but cops can shoot at you.
??
??
@Tanshanomi: A. Men.
@Kelster: The way the story reads, I think she probably got the shiner while head-butting the cop. Just my guess. Obviously we don't have all the facts.
