I came in here to say much the same thing, now I don't have to type nearly as much. Good on ya.
"The last thing we need in a birth control debate is a feminine point of view. We all took health in high school so we know what goes on down there. We don't want to be allowing women to be killing off our sperm with their mascu-cidal pills! Besides, those hussies shouldn't be letting us have the sex with them anyway. Sex leads to us thinking less of them."
-Old White Dudes
It's too bad he wasn't an old school apple-ist. He could've been rocking a anodized aluminum Opel. Although if he was super old school it'd end up being beige and probably then a Toyota.
I'm just surprised mountain lions need gatekeepers. I would think a mountain lion could take care of its own gates.
I think we get that. It's the completely antediluvian thinking and the absolute gall to tell people what to do in the bedroom that's the problem.
I suppose then we have to ask, if it doesn't do anything, is it a law? I think I'm annoyed these people are passing stuff that they don't know what it is AND it's completely frivolous to boot.
When did Daft Punk get into snowboarding?
Legislators can pass anything they want, but it'll be struck down in court.
Wrong kind of union.
...because purity-flying-spaghetti-monster was already taken?
I've always been a bit biased against these surround sound systems with tiny little speakers. How are you supposed to get a full range from something that small? If you have to set the crossover to the subwoofer at 200Hz you're losing your 'surround-ness' for everything between that and about 80Hz. The smallest I'd recommend for surround sound is bookshelf size. Leave these little speakers for computers.
If they're testing something this close to launch date, it's most likely pretty close to the production version. (Unless of course it has nothing to do with the iPad 3)
I'm glad I'm not the only one.
Don't worry, the lord will protect them.
You kinda have to talk about reception when you're talking about transmission. Every test was about how far they could receive a signal transmitted from these antennas
It's also a transmitting antenna though...in fact that was mostly what he was talking about I think.
Ok, so I attempted to read the study to find out actual statistics on the risk of accidents/fatal accidents so I could get an idea what the risk really was, but I'm not so great at statistics and probability. It doesn't really tell me anything to say you're twice as likely to die while driving under the influence of cannabis if I don't know what the risk is without cannabis. If my chances of a fatal accident under control conditions are 1 accident per 10 million miles driven, I'm not sure that a doubling of that risk is significant.
Can anyone translate the study into numbers an idiot like me can understand?
My mom was hooked on the stuff so I was born with the dependency too. Can't shake it.
What if fundamental transformation means something like...I dunno...a thriving economy and a truly free and un-bigoted society? Just sayin'
Do we have to call him a member of the Republic party?
