<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Jalopnik: chrysler 300]]></title>
		
		<link>http://jalopnik.com/tag/chrysler 300</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Jalopnik posts tagged 'chrysler 300']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chrysler Hires Italian Agency To Make This Crappy Car Ad With Taxpayer Dollars]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/500x_chrysler_300c_peace_3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Chrysler's Italian masters at Fiat fired <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bbdodetroit" href="http://jalopnik.com/tag/bbdodetroit/">BBDO Detroit</a>, bringing in an Italian agency to do one commercial for the 300C gansgter-mobile. The ad stars <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mikhailgorbachev" href="http://jalopnik.com/tag/mikhailgorbachev/">Mikhail Gorbachev</a> and calls for Myanmar's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #aungsansuukyi" href="http://jalopnik.com/tag/aungsansuukyi/">Aung San Suu Kyi</a>'s release. My name is-what the fuck?</p>

<p><object id="mbox_player_a697d3bc1711ecc029" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="320" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=a697d3bc1711ecc029&type=sd&security_token=prod3.ab62497e8731b6c7">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed name="mbox_player_a697d3bc1711ecc029" src="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=a697d3bc1711ecc029&type=sd&security_token=prod3.ab62497e8731b6c7" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="320" allowscriptaccess="always" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/thumb160x_a697d3bc1711ecc029.jpg" class="left image158" width="158"  style="display: none;"/><br>
Since this is a new ad agency we're sort of surprised this follows essentially the same trite pattern they use in the <a href="http://jalopnik.com/5397084/first-my-name-is-ram-ad-my-tank-is-full">My Name Is Ram</a> commercial. You know, mixing images and video of the car with inspirational pictures and video. And the imagery they chose? Mikhail Gorbachev, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lechwalesa" href="http://jalopnik.com/tag/lechwalesa/">Lech Walesa</a>, a Trabant, a painting of Nelson Mandela and the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chrysler300" href="http://jalopnik.com/tag/chrysler300/">Chrysler 300</a> mowing down a flock of doves. Seriously &mdash; talk about a mixed metaphor.</p>
<p><em>AdAge</em> tells us <strike>Fiat</strike> <em>Chrysler Group</em>'s Olivier Francois, the president-CEO of the Chrysler vehicle brand, tapped <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #armandotesta" href="http://jalopnik.com/tag/armandotesta/">Armando Testa</a>, his ad agency for Italian Lancia, to warm up a leftover Lancia commercial for the U.S. market.</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L7UuUHntmEA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L7UuUHntmEA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/jalopnik/2009/12/l7uuuhntmea.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/></p>
<p>Hmm, somehow we've got to believe hiring an Italian agency for the work may not sit well with American taxpayers, who bailed out Chrysler earlier this year with billions of dollars in loans. And this while several hundred staffers of Chrysler Group's longtime ad agency, BBDO Detroit, will be out of work at the end of January when the contract expires.</p>
<p>But back to the spot itself. It's a mish-mash of images that have nothing to do with the Chrylser 300C. All this does is continue to beg the question: Why the hell is Chrysler still alive and why did the American taxpayer help keep it alive?</p>
<p>Also, is that a European license plate? Make that a "what the fuck" times two.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=140855">AdAge</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/5419071/chrysler-hires-italian-agency-to-make-this-crappy-car-ad-with-taxpayer-dollars]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-5419071]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ad watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Armando Testa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aung san suu kyi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bbdo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bbdo detroit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lech walesa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mikhail gorbachev]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[myanmar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Hardigree]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419071&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[1969 Mercury Marauder X-100, 1968 Chrysler 300 Go To Crusher Side By Side]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/jalopnik/2009/10/DOTJ-MercNChrysler-500-09.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/10/500x_DOTJ-MercNChrysler-500-09.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Have you ever seen a Marauder X-100 on the street? You'd think that having one of the all-time coolest car names of all time would have spared this monster, but you'd be <em>wrong!</em></p>

<p><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/jalopnik/2009/10/DOTJ-MercNChrysler-500-01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/10/500x_DOTJ-MercNChrysler-500-01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>And then right next to the great big '69 Mercury coupe is a great big <em>Chrysler</em> coupe. Both cars came from the factory with monstrous big-block V8s- a 360-horse 429 for the Marauder and a 350-horse 440 for the 300. What's <em>wrong</em> with the world, when a pair of over-the-top, single-digit-gas-mileage, two-ton two-doors can survive through all the oil crises and recessions and only <em>now</em> land in the Crusher's waiting room? It gets worse; this is one of the <a href="http://jalopnik.com/5384155/adios-amigos-pick-your-parts-octopus-shuts-norcal-wrecking-yards">now-defunct NorCal Pick Your Part yards</a>, which means we can assume both these cars have now been rendered into China-bound scrap metal by now.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5387255,9,);
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/5387391/1969-mercury-marauder-x+100-1968-chrysler-300-go-to-crusher-side-by-side]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-5387391]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[down on the junkyard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1968]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1968 Chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1968 Chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1969]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1969 Mercury]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1969 Mercury Marauder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chrysler C Body]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[junkyard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[junkyard find]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mercury]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mercury Marauder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[X-100]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murilee Martin]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5387391&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[2010 Chrysler 300C Interior Gets Massive Touchscreen]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/04/2010_Chrysler_300C_Interior.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/jalopnik/2009/04/2010_Chrysler_300C_Interior.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>This image, pilfered from today's Chrysler conference at the <a href="http://jalopnik.com/tag/new-york-auto-show/">NY Auto Show</a> by <em><a href="http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2009/04/more-of-the-next-chrysler-300-interior-shown.html">Cars.com</a></em>, demonstrates the <a href="http://jalopnik.com/5155433/2010-chrysler-300c-imaginary-hotness">2010 Chrysler 300</a> may finally get a big boy interior and humongous touchscreen.</p>

<p>After a strong showing from the upscale new <a href="http://jalopnik.com/5203380/2011-jeep-grand-cherokee-good-looking-but-is-it-enough?skyline=true&s=i">2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee</a>, it seems Chrysler may have finally stopped sticking Fischer Price interiors into their $30k+ vehicles and started using real materials. Gone are the days of gashing yourself on a seam-welded grab handle or smacking your not-so-funny bone on a rock solid armrest &mdash; or so we hope.</p>
<p>It's clear the interior isn't quite as advanced as what's found in the <a href="http://jalopnik.com/5132039/jalopnik-hacks-chrysler-concept-uconnect-in+car-internet-service-lives-to-tell-about-it">Chrylser 200C Concept</a>, but it appears to take on the concept's philosophy of an MMI-centered layout.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2009/04/more-of-the-next-chrysler-300-interior-shown.html">Cars.com</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/5203844/2010-chrysler-300c-interior-gets-massive-touchscreen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-5203844]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[new york auto show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2009 new york auto show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2010 300C Interior]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2010 chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2010 Chrysler 300C]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2010 Chrysler 300C Interior]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300 Interior]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chrysler 300 Interior]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nyc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:12:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Didorosi]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5203844&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[You Say You Want To Know That '63 Chrysler's History?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/03/KittenChrysler.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/jalopnik/2009/03/KittenChrysler.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Sometimes a classic car's for-sale listing includes a bunch of boring stuff about the regular maintenance performed by its original owner… and sometimes you get the tale of a gelatin-encased carburetor named after a cat.</p>

<p><a href="http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/cto/1078941874.html">This 1963 Chrysler 300 ad</a> (go <a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/jalopnik/2009/03/Kitten_Chrysler_Carburetor-SS.jpg">here</a> if the ad disappears) belongs in the second category. It appears to be referring to the $595 Chrysler in <a href="http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/cto/1076037805.html">this ad</a>, and the differing writing style makes us suspect that the authors may not know each other. No matter, because we think this tirade deserves a <a href="http://sfbay.craigslist.org/flag/?flagCode=9&postingID=1076037805">Best Of Craigslist vote</a> regardless of author. And, hey, note the LeMons-grade asking price for that big-block Mopar- you could <del>never in a million years</del> totally win the race with that beast. Thanks to <a href="http://jalopnik.com/people/oskimba/">Oskimba</a> for the tip!</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I believe the car originally belonged to my Aunt Betsy, who was born in Wisconsin in 1931, and later migrated to California in 1954, while engaged to my Uncle Talbert.<br>
She had a Tabby cat named Blinky, who died in the spring of 57. Blinky had 6 kittens in 1955, all of whom she regrettably gave away at a fair in Modesto. The cats where never seen or heard from again. Betsy left Modesto in 1963, approximately at the time she allegedly helped purchase the car for her lover, Benson, whom Talbert was unaware of. Unbeknownst to Betsy at that period, a second Tabby cat, also named Blinky, gave birth to 8 kittens, who had made a home in the Chrysler, while it was parked in the garage of Bensons home, hidden from Uncle Talbert. Talbert took ill in 1966, quite suspiciously I was informed, and he later expired from the odd illness in 1967. Meanwhile the Chryslers interior had been moderately tattered from the matured cats, 3 of whom had made the car their permanent home.<br>
Betsy and Benson seperated ways in 1971, and Betsy took the Chrysler, and the two remaining cats, Philby and Jessup, with her to Berkeley. It was then that Betsy unfortunately became addicted to pain-killers, and the Chrysler<br>
was parked in a storage facility in Oakland for several years. Although Philby loyally stayed with Betsy, Jessup disappeared. Philby passed away in 1984, and Betsy was devastated.<br>
For reasons unknown, Betsy became obsessed with the 2 barrel carburetor of the Chrysler, and took it off the engine, and carried in her purse for the next 12 years. She eerily named the carburetor Jessup, after her beloved missing cat, and she was finally admitted to a rehabilitation center in 1996. The Chrysler was removed from storage in Oakland, and later transported to Talberts sisters home in Richmond. While packing Betsys household items for storage, her<br>
nephew, Melvin, found the beloved carburetor in the refrigerator of Betsys home, and he had the carburetor rebuilt. It had been placed inside a plastic bowl, and submersed in a green gelatin.<br>
Melvin applied for lien-custody of the Chrysler in 1998, and was denied the lien by the Department of Motor Vehicles.<br>
At that point, the distressed nephew abandoned the efforts to claim the Chrysler, and the car remained in the garage in Richmond, until Talberts sister died in 2004. For some odd reason, Talberts sister had willed the Chrysler to the deceased cat, and the car was restored to Betsys ownership once again in 2006, as the ownershp had been declared invalid.<br>
Betsy died in Dec. 2008, and at that time the car was given to Melvin, as he had wished, and Melvin then traded the car to me, in exchange for a 50/unit of 1/2 inch 4 ft by 8 ft cdx exterior grade roof plywood sheathing.</p>
<p>I certainly hope that clears up the confusion.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/5178143/you-say-you-want-to-know-that-63-chryslers-history]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-5178143]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[found on craigslist]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1963]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1963 Chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murilee Martin]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5178143&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[1962 Chrysler 300]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2008/05/340x_62_Chrysler300_LH.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Remember the <a href="http://jalopnik.com/cars/down-on-the-street/1962-chrysler-new-yorker-266092.php">'62 New Yorker</a> we saw nearly a year ago? We all liked its evil-beater look, but these cars looked pretty good when nice and shiny, too. It was quite a find when I spotted this '62 in the island's East End, parked in the exact spot in which the <a href="http://jalopnik.com/373728/1971-chevrolet-k5-blazer">1971 Chevy Blazer</a> normally parks. I see the Chrysler parked there every once in a while, never at the same time as the Blazer, so I suspect they're owned by the same person.<br></p>

<p><br>
<img alt="62_Chrysler300_Front.jpg" src="http://jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2008/05/62_Chrysler300_Front.jpg" width="494" height="321"><br>
Love it or hate it, but you can't ignore this face. Like the nose of a space cruiser! Maybe Chrysler will retro-ize this look at some point.<br>
<br>
<img alt="62_Chrysler300_Taillight.jpg" src="http://jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2008/05/62_Chrysler300_Taillight.jpg" width="494" height="370"><br>
And the taillights- wow! These cars didn't just <em>look</em> good; the 300s could get going pretty well, too. The standard engine was a 305-horsepower 383; if that wasn't enough, you could spring for the dual-quad 413 in the 300H, which gave you a mighty 380 horsepower... and if <em>that</em> wasn't enough, a 405-horse version was available. Sadly, you couldn't get a 4-speed from the factory, but dealers back then were generally willing to make such an option happen for those willing to pay.<br>
<br>
<img alt="62_Chrysler300_Interior.jpg" src="http://jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2008/05/62_Chrysler300_Interior.jpg" width="494" height="370"><br>
The interior is very nice, although that can of starter fluid on the seat isn't a good sign.<br>
<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('DOTS62Chrys300', 20, '1962 Chrysler 300 Down on the Street');
</script><br>
<br></p>
<center>
<h2><a href="http://jalopnik.com/360001/200-surviving-old-vehicles-down-on-the-alameda-street">DOTS 1-200</a> - <a href="http://jalopnik.com/384439/250-vintage-vehicles-down-on-the-alameda-street-trailer-queens-need-not-apply">DOTS 201-250</a></h2>
</center>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/390165/1962-chrysler-300]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-390165]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[down on the street]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1962]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1962 chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1962 chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[alameda]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 May 2008 09:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murilee Martin]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=390165&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Starbucks Coffee Shop Takes A Chrysler 300 Break]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2008/05/340x_Chrysler-300C-Starbucks-Crash.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Patrons at a Bellingham, Washington Starbucks got quite the surprise yesterday when a 2008 Chrysler 300 driven by an elderly man crashed through the floor to ceiling window and across the shop. Five people were injured in the incident, though none seriously, and the driver is facing a charge of second degree negligent driving. Fortunately for us, a table was embedded in the grille and it makes it look like the 300 is sticking it's tongue out. We're assuming the injured will be suing for millions to cover the cost of spilled coffee. (<em>Hat tip to R_Evolution</em>)<br>
<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('starbucks300', 3, 'The Inaugural Running of the Starbucks 300');
</script>[Source And More Photos: <a href="http://www.bellinghamherald.com/477/story/402467.html">Bellingham Herald</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/388218/starbucks-coffee-shop-takes-a-chrysler-300-break]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-388218]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[accidents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300 crash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300c crash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler crashes into starbucks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[starbucks coffee]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[starbucks crash]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 May 2008 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Wojdyla]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=388218&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DUB Edition Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger, Please Make It Stop]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2008/04/2008-DUB-Edition-Chrysler-300-Touring.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Sweet quarts of Pennzoil, why must every automaker jump on bandwagons they have no business being on? Chrysler, the reason people put DUB wheels and parts on their cars is to be unique and stand out from the crowd. By partnering with DUB for the 2008 DUB Edition Chrysler 300 Touring and 2008 DUB Edition Dodge Charger SXT, you're missing the point. Now you have two underpowered cars, with largely unremarkable styling, and overblown Kicker sound systems that will be replaced anyway. Has everyone at Chryslerberus taken crazy pills?<br>
<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('dubeditions', 2, 'DUB Enhanced Chrysler Products');
</script>[<a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=125793#2">Inside Line</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/382550/dub-edition-chrysler-300-and-dodge-charger-please-make-it-stop]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-382550]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[new cars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2008 dub edition chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2008 dub edition dodge charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300 touring]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300 touring]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dodge]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dodge charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dub]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dub 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dub charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touring]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Wojdyla]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=382550&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[2011 Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger To Remain Rear-Wheel Drive, Get Makeover]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2008/02/2006-Dodge-Charger-SRT8-Review-TOP.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />It's no news that the 300's been a hit for Chrysler &mdash; and we here at the Jalop obviously are fans of the <a href="http://jalopnik.com/cars/jalopnik-reviews/jalopnik-reviews-2006-dodge-charger-srt8-part-1-198548.php">Dodge Charger SRT8</a>, and the new <a href="http://jalopnik.com/352792/2008-dodge-challenger-srt8-revealed-officially">Dodge Challenger</a>'s certainly got itself a purdy mouth. But there's potentially going to be some fuel economy issues inherent with a RWD, Hemi-powered platform given the current desire by Washington to focus toward beating up automakers and away from a more common-sensical Euro approach to increasing fuel economy. So what's the three-headed dog-owned car company going to do? According to the website for the lovers, the dreamers and me the answer is &mdash; not a whole lot.</p>
<p><em>The Car Connection</em> is reporting:</p>
<blockquote>"Chrysler's plans for its large 300/Charger sedans include a major makeover for the 2011 model year. But while Chrysler's new managers have been dropping hints about the future of the HEMI engine, there's not much they can do about the rear-drive layout of the big sedans."</blockquote>
Although we can barely contain our glee about continuing a vehicular line-up including a rear-wheel drive power sedan, we are wondering why they're not looking to change that somewhat inefficient in fuel economy, but always efficient in fun, drivetrain plan. <em>TCC</em>'s got an answer for that too:
<blockquote>"A switch to front-wheel drive could improve the fuel economy of the sedans, but reports to TCC say that there's no money set aside to make the switch to front-wheel drive."</blockquote>
Whatever happened to the mountains of dollars private equity's able to drop on an automaker? [via <a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/blog/?p=795">The Car Connection</a>]]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/356904/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear+wheel-drive-get-makeover]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Jalopnik-356904]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[industry news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2011 chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2011 chrysler 300c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2011 dodge charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2011 dodge charger srt8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[300c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cerberus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[challenger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[challenger srt8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charger srt8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrysler 300c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dodge]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dodge challenger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dodge challenger srt8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dodge charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dodge charger srt8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rear wheel drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rwd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Wert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalopnik.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=356904&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
