The days of Aston Martin being under the Ford umbrella are gone. Even though Ford still owns a small stake in Aston and still provides some key parts critical to a small volume marque, they're no longer playing the role of big bad bureaucracy. That role's being filled by the new majority owners — Investment DAR. The new bosses have said they want to continue to increase production year to year. Thing is, the current Gaydon plant may not be able to handle all the new volume. Lucky for DAR they also own a 7-percent stake in Daimler AG, the parent company of Mercedes-Benz.
So those Ford-based V8s and V12s, as well as those Volvo-sourced electronics and interior bits may be on the way out in favor of Mercedes replacements. Another possibility is that a future Mercedes SL made of aluminum may share a platform with a future Aston Martin. Only time will tell... but the mere thought of an AMG twin-turbo V12 sitting between the fenders of a 007-tastic Aston will have us up all night. [via Reuters, Autocar]














Comments
More bad news. Blasphemy, blasphemy, blasphemy.
I don't mind the engine swappage, or the interior changes.. but platform sharing? With the Germans?
Jeezee creezee.
I dunno, the design philosophies of the DBs and the SLs are not that far apart, so with some cutaneous fudging, they could pull it off. It's not like they'll ever do an "Aston DB by Mercedes". If parts-sharing with AMG is good enough for Pagani, it's almost good enough for Aston.
I like it. AM65 Vantage. whee!
It seems like sort of a minor partnership, like Chrysler and Bristol*. The could do worse. And have.
*Will Chryslerbus keep selling V10s to Bristol after the Viper stops production? Am I the first person in the world to wonder about this?
As long as they still produce the best looking cars with the best sounding engines, I'll still love them. To be honest, they could probably do with a touch of German engineering...
@mwood10: I'm with you.
I don't care where they come from as long as they keep producing the same jaw-dropping results. I mean, it's not like they're brandsharing with Kia. Name one among us who despises the sound of a big-bore AMG V8. It's like a strange cross-breeding of Elisha Cuthbert and Jessica Alba. Nothing bad can come of this.
@BlackIce_GTS: Yeah, but how many cars does Bristol actually make? You'd think they could just stock up and get like a decade's worth of V10s now.
Though I've gotta say, if I were ordering a Bristol, I'd ask if they could build it with a Cummins Diesel.
Do you think Mopar will keep making just the engines just like GMPerformance still makes old discontinued engines?
I still say Ford fucked up. They should have rebadged a DB9 for the US market when they had the chance, and they wouldn't be in the pickle they are in now. As far as Aston Martin going Merc, what other choices do they have? At least Daimler can produce quality product. I agree that the English and German design approaches have historically been light years apart, but that is changing. As they say in philosophy:
ALL THAT RISES MUST CONVERGE.
Does this mean a bump, drop, or no change in reliability/quality?
@DoctorNine: rebadged DB9 could have been a Mercury Cougar. sweet.
A well-selected German engine shouldn't be that bad. -Look what BMW's V12 did for McLaren.
The Bentley/VW deal worked out rather well, didn't it? Whatever it takes to keep Aston from going the way of TVR is fine by me.
DO NOT WANT!
I know I'm going to sound like one of those beardy bastards in a Val Doonican sweater and a brown store coat when I say this, but doesn't anyone care about heritage anymore? Especially when it comes to a prestigious brand with such a strong identity.
@goatrope: Deal? More like corporate buyout. Bentleys are now nothing more than Volkswagens for footballers; it also doesn't help that the Continental Flying Spur looks like a fat Rover 75.
Why can't cars be unique anymore? Ooooo, if anyone wants me I'll be in the angry dome!
Mercedes over ford... this is a no brainer. Ford should've called it quits when they were ahead (right after the last Model T rolled off the production line)
Finally good news, opening an Astin Martin with a Ford Fiesta key I assure you is not one of the best expperience I've tried. German allways did good cars
let's give them a try!
@Euromobile: only the gt and the flying spur are VW's, the RL and the others r still bentley's
@bmoredlj: Probally the same. Despite Mercedes/AMG quality shortcommings in other areas, their engines have always been pretty spot on. And i mean, Aston has never been exactly the pinnacle of reliability.
As this goes, well, AMs just got a hell of a lot quicker. This shouldent change much about Astons over all, i would be redicousuly supprised if MB bought Aston (which they wont). Platform sharing wouldent be that bad, i think, but is rather unlikely. Once you get up into super car territory, the underpinnings dosent really that much matter anymore.
@blazer: Fair comment, but they've made them look like VolkBentleys.
Cock. *VolksBentleys.
I see no problem here.. as long as they keep the AM identity as strong as it is now, I'm all for it. THink of AM without any foreign parts.. it simply wont exist.
no. this cannot happen.
@maxman927: What exactaly? Do tell.
packing?
fudge?
fudgepacking?
huh?
@Euromobile: What's wrong with a Rover 75? Onea those Mustang V8 MG ones with all the chav-tastic trim replaced with proper grandad Rover trim would be sleeper-tastic! Especially with about 1000hp of tune-up parts on that big ole pushrod...
@13thfloorelevator: Nothing, actually. I quite like them. A Bentley just shouldn't look like one that's let itself go.
I like your sleeper 75 idea...
Didn't Fisker already make an Aston out of a SLK? I think an AMG V12 will be better than two duratec's stuck together.
@Euromobile: were you this concerned about heritage when Ford bought them? or when they bought Jaguar?
from what i've seen, heritage is more of a principle which is kept by endowing the spirit of the brand. It doesn't matter who owns it, as proven by the fact that Toyota trucks are made/designed in America, but are still "foreign", or Chrysler was owned by D-Benz, but still made a quintessential american muscle car. There are far more intricate dealings and processes that occur to get many of your favorite "heritage-rich" brands to market, that you might deem blasphemous if you actually knew about them. But you don't, so it doesn't matter. The Phantom was designed by a German- but does it still look/sound/feel like a big british car? yep.
So as long as the spirit of the brand is kept, and not switched to something else (Aston making Smart cars), it should be fine, if not better.
@savethevipers: euh, it is owned by a german company, but I think it is designed by the brit Ian Cameron?
@savethevipers:
Q: Now James, we've had some serious budget cuts, so please try not to wreck this one...
of course, something like that could help Aston survive in a 35 MPG world (or whatever the new Euro standards are...).
I wish Jaguar got a lending hand too. Their power is lacking compared to other competitors.
@Mark Arnold: That's hilarious. it makes me wonder though, what would be the best/worst/most hilarious automobile to put a Cummins diesel in. Maybe you could put it in an old Mercedes saloon for the bad pun factor (get it die-SEL? Like you hate the car? Anybody? Anybody? Beuler?) Anywho, bastarizations of cars with diesel seems very Jalop-appropriate.
Well, if Ford didn't kill 'em, Daimler-Benz sure won't.
@Euromobile: You've hit the nail on the head. I'm a grumpy old bastard too, and I don't want a damn German Aston. Besides the emotionally charged heritage issue, will Mercedes do something to stop Astons from competing head-on with SLs and CLs? I'm never going to be able to afford a DB9, and I don't plan on putting up with any bitching from anyone who can, but I think it would be tragic to see these cars lose any more of their "Britishness."
Although Morgans now use BMW engines, so perhaps Britihness is dead anyway. Hey, Mark, Bristol can go back to using Bimmer motors, like after the war when they used the 328's pushrod six! I'm sure they'd still be willing to build you a Cummins-engined Blenheim if you like... for a price.
@Armand4: see, that kind of conversation scares me (both here and on Top Gear) because the British motor industry seems to be what the American one will be like in a decade or two if certain companies I won't name (Chrysler and Ford) don't get their acts together...
@sos10: unfortunately, i don't have a name, but according to my source, who worked in the BMW studio at the time, it was done by a German. There's a good possibility that there were some Brits on the team as well, which justifies my point even more- just b/c somebody buys someone, doesn't mean they completely clean house (unless it's D-B buying Chrysler, but they were just being dicks) I'll get back to you on it.
@smokyburnout: it would be harder to flip, this time
This just seems wrong. I can't explain why. It's kind of like when I see Merlin-engined Me109s at airshows.
@BlackIce_GTS: Honestly, no. I have never even seen a Bristol in person but love the idea of them being out there.
@smokyburnout: Yeah, pretty much. And we don't have little cottage-industry-type companies to carry the torch, either... Britain still has Morgan. If/when the big 3 implode, like British Leyland/Rover except bigger and messier, we won't have little handmade sportscars to keep our spirits up. Honestly, what will we do without Mustangs, Corvettes and stuff?
I suppose this whole thing brings up the question of national character in cars-- what makes an MG, Jag or Aston Martin British? Is America about muscle cars, or are muscle cars about America? Do Chinese cars just suck because Communism doesn't work, or is there another reason? Maybe we could make a QOTD out of that.
everyone realizes that the V12s in Astons are basically two Duratec V6s (which first made it to market in the not quite loved Ford Contour/Mondeo back in the day) which have been built in Germany for several years on a special niche line set up for them on Cologne, right ?
the V8s are a development of the Jag AJ-V8, tho I think it's more a situation where they share the architecture (bore spacing, etc) rather than any parts being interchangeable.
and that Aston has been run by a German (Ulrich Bez) for a number of years now, so is "German" engineered already ?
I'm not so sure that running AMG motors or sharing platforms makes all that much sense for Aston, they don't really need more power than they have now and if the wave of the future is lighter, smarter supercars (as Ferrari is pointing towards) then I dunno that MB has that sort of platform in mind given that the SL is sorta a pig weight-wise. but stranger things have happened.
@dwp: Yes, yes, yes. And it has worked well so far (other than the Jag motor in the V8 Vantage being a teeny bit embarrassed by the insane outputs of certain competitors).
@smokyburnout: nice Aston Smartin
@Mark Arnold: [www.trident-vehicles.co.uk]
Diesel V8 British sport/GT thing. Bristols are less ugly though.
@Armand4: we really arent looking good on the low-production sports car side of things... Saleen, Panoz and Shelby all rely on Ford to some degree, though they could probably go on without them...
Mosler doesn't really build cars, do they?
if Tesla doesnt completely fail with the Roadster, they could concievably outlast the Big 3, but to do so they'd probably have to expand their lineup with more mainstream, non-sports car things like the Whitestar...
@smokyburnout: i would be proud to park this in my driveway, with a hugemassive diesel V8.
@Schm:
we need asto to be it's own, i mean, merc quality hasn't been up to par lately and people spending that kind of money wont buy them if they aren't good.
What is David Richards's middle name? Does it begin with an A? If it turns out he has a majority in a fund that controls 7% of Daimler, it might explain why Prodrive was going to use McLarens in F1, might it not?
Never read the sports pages nor the specialist press if you want to understand what's really going on in F1...
@savethevipers: I'm perfectly aware of the various "intricate processes and dealings", but I object to platform-sharing, re-skinning and badge-engineering of Mercs to create Astons.
I'm always a bit concerned when a foreign car manufacturer buys out a British one, but in the case of Ford, I wasn't too bothered. Ford have had a pseudo-independant British arm since years, so they know the score when it comes to building a 'British' car. Unfortunately a lot of key decisions on Jag, Land Rover (which mercifully they've managed not to completely mess up, although they're now going to hock it to the Indians), and Aston were made by the top execs in Dearborn and look where that got them.
As for the Rolls-Royce Phantom, I know that the basic frame and engine are built in Germany. It would be nice if they were still made in the UK, but at least they are both unique to the Phantom. In addition, the design team behind the car was apparently led by a Brit (not that it matters much) and the final assembly is done in the UK, almost entirely by hand, with craftsmen employed in many of the processes.
To expand on the design aspect, foreign designers have penned cars for firms since years. For example, all the best Peugeots were designed by Pininfarina and all the best Triumphs were designed by Michelotti.
@Armand4: Exactly. Maybe you're right though; maybe the British car is dead and we should just stop worrying about it.
@dwp: Yes, I knew that the Aston V12 was essentially two Duratec V6s. That's a decent enough engine though and it's been good enough for Noble for quite some time now.
@Euromobile: Remember the legend that England will fall when the ravens leave the Tower of London? Now they clip their wings so they can't fly away, and they just hang out spreading disease to tourists. In theory, since the ravens can never leave the Tower, England will never fall. I think that Morgan is the automotive incarnation of these ravens, and that once they stop building 4/4s on five-inch-wide wire wheels with aluminum-over-hardwood bodies the Krauts are going to completely take over.